Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
If the pixel offered unlimited photos and full resolution, i would of bought the pixel just for traveling. it's an underrated feature, especially for video.
 
It is interesting that so many reviews come to completely varied conclusions about these phones/modes.
I believe it shows that any reviews are subjective, subjective of the preference of the reviewer. So I never take any reviews seriously as they are simply the biased opinion of the reviewer. Besides, most of them are simply repeating the same things the manufacturer is saying on their ads with nothing new to add.
 
Damn, Google. Apple has finally caught up to your amazing cameras!
 
As a lay user, all the pictures look fine. Thus other factors will come in if I were to choose between the two, factors like actual usability and battery life. The phone that less annoying for me on day to day will be the winner. And so far based on online reading, if I were to choose between these two phone, the iPhone will be my choice. The radar gimmick, poorer battery life, and inconsistent FaceID on the Pixel offset any camera quality as those things will annoy me as a lay user on a daily basis. I don’t want to sacrifice battery life and security of my phone just so I can get some slightly sharper photos.

+1. When both phones take pictures of comparable quality, other factors come into my purchasing decision.
 
Just for perspective, I would love it if they'd include a $500 DSLR in the mix. Yes, I get that a phone in your pocket beats a DSLR in your closet at home, but just show what that different league looks like at print resolution. These phone camera comparisons are so silly next to how good "good" is.

Outside of some obvious boundary situations, I've rarely found the strength of a photograph, and the power it releases, tied to the pedigree/type/brand/etc of the camera capturing the image.

I could write paragraphs about what it is tied to. But as it's not about gear, I think many here would find that "boring."
 
If money wasn't an issue I'd say iPhone. Being that the pixel 4 xl is $300 cheaper due to launch promos at places like Best Buy, it's hard for me to say the iPhone is $300 better.

And yes, having used both platforms extensively, typically the deciding factor on wha phone I use for the nex 3+ years is indeed camera quality. That said, I've go another year before my X becomes a hand me down. And a camera his nice (or beer) plus usb c will have me really considering dropping the cash on he iPhone.
 
Camera’s are close, just choose the smartphone that gives you working headphones in its box.
 
XL looks better.
Seriously, I have no idea how this conclusion can be reached objectively, and so confidently.
[automerge]1571798926[/automerge]
I would be curious to see an ACTUAL camera comparison between the phones using purely the hardware. No post sensor processing.
Mobile phone photography is all about processing. The hardware basically can’t take good pictures without a lot of software magic.
 
Let's remember for a moment that this is the Pro version of the iPhone, the PRO version!... head to head to the boring Pixel 4.
The Xr can take essentially the same photos because it has all the processing power and just lacks 1 of the cameras.
 
QUESTION: Other than the telephoto part of this video, shouldn't all results be the same on the iPhone 11 (non-pro) vs. Pixel 4???

I've asked in a few forums if data is taken from telephoto lens to improve pics and video recorded through the other 2, making results on the pro better than what you'd get on the non-pro. I haven't seen a single reply.
 
iPhone still have huge problems in portrait mode, just look at the fork. I recently took a picture of my daughter on a swing at the playground, portrait mode was great on the background but it blurred the chains of the swing too much, it looked like my daughter was flying... Sometimes I take portrait pictures of the dogs and details on the ears or nose are missing. I like the camera but portrait mode is still hit or miss. Night mode is impressive though, they did a really good job
 
I'm really tired of these macrumors comparisons ending the same way, saying that they can't pick a winner and it comes down to platform preference. Grow a pair and make a decision for once.

But how do you define a "winner"? The best phone/camera for you might not be the best one for me. And what if the differences are totally subjective? The picture processing the reviewer prefers might not be the one you do. Surely it's better to give readers all the information so they can make an informed decision? There's too many people out there who need someone else to take care of all their decisions and opinions for them.
 
I’m glad I’m not the only one who has said this. I went from 5s to 8 plus and the noise reduction is extremely noticeable. I miss the 5s quality
Install a third party camera app like Camera+ 2, shoot in RAW and then you can tweak the amount of noise reduction manually. That cuts out all of Apples fancy HDR and deep fusion processing.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.