Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Farm - Flag shot: Pixel sky has "filtered" appearance, 11 Pro looks more normal.
Seashore: Pixel sky "filtered", underlit in shadows
Night Mode: Pixel has artifacts around street lights--that's bad. 11 Pro light look real, altho building maybe a little underlit.
Pizza: 11 Pro warmer, maybe not as sharp.
Portrait: Pixel underlit, white squares on shirt look purple. 11 Pro is warmer.
Stairs: Pixel underlit

That's just me. I seem to prefer the iPhone.
 
Eh? iPhone can’t blur the background properly. A clear fail and a “feature” I absolutely hate :( I won’t move to android though but I wish Apple had better edge detection
I know! It's shocking!

Screen Shot 2019-10-24 at 17.07.18.png


Oh wait. That's the Pixel 4.
 
Without true wide angle, the Pixel's not even an option for me. If you understand what's going on in the interactions between focal length, field of view, depth of field, etc. you know how much more your options open up with a true wide angle lens compared to a 2x tele over a "widish"-"normal" lens.

This is why as a photographer I jumped onto LG's phones three years ago although not the best "normal" shots. And can now go iPhone.

And of course having all three is the best of the current crop of options, especially if they're beautifully integrated as in the iPhone 11Pro.
 
Come on Mac, it’s OK to say the iPhone is the better over the android camera.

You won’t look biased because it’s the truth!
 
Come on Mac, it’s OK to say the iPhone is the better over the android camera.

You won’t look biased because it’s the truth!
Certainly not when a lot of even android tech you tubers are saying the same thing...and deep fusion isn’t even out yet
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.