Whatever. The picture you showed with great pride of the exhibition from above was about the worst possible example of how phone cameras are great photographic tools. It's exactly the conditions where a phone camera will take a grungy shot with no definition, lousy colour. It's a poor photocopy of what might be visually arresting.
You seem to be on some ego trip trying to prove that it's the photographer, not the camera, and that you are that photographer. If you have the respect for the medium you profess, you'd realise that most of the names on your list cared a great deal for the technical perfection of their work and would not shoot poor quality pictures where they could shoot high quality pictures. That their gear was sometimes inferior to modern cameras was a source of great frustration to them.
As the gallery from above photo is not an image which requires shooting it right away with whatever happened to be in your lazy hands (someone who really care images would carry a more capable camera), it's just a terrible example of the use of an iPhone for photography. You'll probably say, "oh but the girl was just there then in the moment". Even if that's true, it wouldn't be difficult to go back there with a female friend and recreate those circumstances but with a camera capable of capturing the colours better along with some definition.
iPhone pictures are great as small screen thumbnails. Depending on conditions and subject, they are mostly horrible for print. Since you seem to think the worse the camera, the better the picture, there's a whole new world of pinhole cameras and iPhone 3GS cameras open to you.
***
The black and white portrait above is a better use of a phone camera as it's shot in better light and the subject is ephemeral. By heavily post-processing the image and converting it to BW, you've effectively masked the poor colours, unpleasant texture and noise of a phone camera. That's a more suitable use of an iPhone camera, for grunge outdoor street portraits than when you try to pretend phone cameras are the right tool for structured art compositions shot in dim interiors where colour plays a central role.
Why are you hijacking this thread to promote yourself? The thread is not about whether it's possible to shoot publishable images on a phone camera. but about the relative merits of camera on an iPhone 13 Pro camera vs a Google Pixel 6. If you have something to say on the subject say your piece.
Showing off that you don't know when to shoot with a small sensor camera and when to shoot with a large sensor camera only shows you for a silly fellow, not an artist.
