Fully understanding the obvious compromises, I made the jump to using an 11 Pro in lieu of my prosumer DSLR for work (product photos and video). For my current set of clients, everything goes on an online store or social media so top quality images are not so much on their need list. (I'm pretty good at PS editing so I can make it work.) So for me the convenience and actually better follow-focus (for video) and not wanting to invest thousands on a camera/lenses when I can get the job done "well enough" with my phone (and rent my phone to the project, thus paying it off) was a win-win. That said, I'm really looking forward to higher pixel counts for cropping in, and other improvements when my 14Pro arrives this week.
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Camera Comparison: iPhone 14 Pro Max vs. iPhone 13 Pro Max
- Thread starter MacRumors
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
Maybe they're less consistent now.
Hasn't apple been moving their assembly factories?
Not sure if that's a reason.
Pandemic?
Don't know.
Don't even know if the are less consistent than in the past but there seem to be a lot of ups and downs with the 14 pro.
"Mirrorless or DSLR" take advantage of large $1k+ lenses. The tiny lenses in phones are very, very different.
Not really. The issue you call much more like marketing than reality is really less competent photogs failing to grasp what to do with These days the camera improvements bandied about at iPhone.
There are always "reported" issues with every launch. Having said that with respect to my pro max:
- 120 mhz is great
- phone is clearly quicker than xs max
- battery life is stellar
- 5g seems okay, but clearly faster then lte
- AOD is fantastic
- Reloading doesn't seem to happen very often
- I can tell the difference with photos from my xs max. I'm sure the photos from the pro max as apple tweaks the software will be better than those of the preceding iphones
- the xs max is a great phone but the pro max is much better; especially with that fantastic screen
YMMV.
I haven't experienced that being a photographer and regularly making photographs with my phone starting with an iPhone 4s, and then the 5s, 6+, X, 12P, and now 14 PM. Each phone has exhibited a very noticeable and decent step up in both image quality and capability.
You fail to grasp the value of 4x as many pixels. It is NOT just about the simplistic visual blind comparison of unedited pix that you propose. Sorry for shouting, but more image data has huge value.
My 12 MP ~2001 Nikon D2x makes good 13x19 prints and so does my 46 MP Nikon D850, pretty much visually undifferentiable if one simplistically compared well-shot prints from each camera. However, competent photogs edit most of their pix, and cell phone camera systems in particular do a large amount of post capture processing. More image data available is good thing.
Your commentary (and this article as well) fail to grasp that the photog needs to involve in capturing and using the additional available image data. No free lunch, it takes work.
To the untrained eye, such as myself, I do not see the difference in the iPhone 13 PM camera and the iPhone 14 PM camera. When I heard of the 48MP I got excited being that I am about to take up photography. After seeing several camera comparisons I am even more confident in my decision to hold onto my iPhone 13 PM.
Most folks will find that just taking lots of images and looking carefully at them will train their eyes/brain over time. Those who just glance at pix ("cute kitty") and do not really look/think about them may not train their eyes/brain over time.
Personally I recommend that folks pay attention, think, and learn. Digital photography being free means pretty much everyone can readily improve their photography. But it does require some effort.
Last edited:
Yes, "according to these pictures." The pix from the article are NOT representative of proper usage of the new iPhone 14 Pro camera capabilities.
No, it is not just you. The pix in the article were NOT properly taken such as to take advantage of the iPhone 14 Pro camera capabilities. Despite marketing by Apple and others, competent photography is not fully effortless.
I have been using the 14 Pro for work photography since getting it on day one, and you are exactly correct. The additional available image data is very useful. But it does take some thought, unlike the pix in this poorly done article.
Not my experience, but I am generally in relatively strong cell areas. I find the 14 Pro unequivocally smoother and faster than the already excellent 13 Pro.
Because the article's photography was totally thoughtless.
Those are thoughtless examples. Not recommended that anyone base anything on such a poorly done article.
Yes. The far more image data means a competent photog has far more image data to work with. But the key is "data to work with." Despite marketing to the contrary and despite the thoughtless photography of the article, it does take some thoughtful effort.
Please do not judge the 14 Pro camera based on the thoughtless photography of tgis article.
Great summary.
From my point of view:
I don't care about the 120 mhz and had it set on 60 max, no big differences in what I do, plus I was trying to not drain the battery.
On the 5g I also have that turned off and use LTE only, works fine for me and is fast enough, also trying not to drain the battery.
I liked the Always On on the 14 pro but it's not something I have to have.
Honestly that's about all I liked about the 14 Pro Max.
The Dynamic Island is big and bulky and is the way when it's not doing stuff.
The notch on the XS is just about level with the Clock and Battery indicator line so visually it works fine for me.
For me the differences simply didn't warrant spending the 1199 x tax (8.25%) which was nearly 1300 bucks.
Again, nice comparison of the two. Thanks for your input.
My comment include edited or non-edited photos, whether taken in JPEG or RAW. No photog eyes I've met has been able to differentiate them, be it from IP 11, 12, 13 or 14. Whatever small gains experienced is just self fulfilling post purchase therapy.
My message is about difference in iPhone photos over the past 3 years.
And yet they're promoted as easy-to-use features for everyone.
Dan (from MacRumors) makes this point clearly in the YT video compared to the article then it seems.
Correct. It does take some thought, some effort. Reality is that they can be "easy-to-use features for everyone" and still not be brainless/automatic. Some thought and some effort are required.
We disagree. I assure you that every time I can present a superior final product starting from the 4x image data of the 14 Pro than starting from the 13 Pro. You personally may not always notice the difference, but some pix (heavily cropped, for instance) will be obvious to even less trained eyes/brains.