Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Always-on display?

  • Yea

    Votes: 23 33.3%
  • Nay

    Votes: 30 43.5%
  • Indifferent

    Votes: 16 23.2%

  • Total voters
    69
Just no. Read the post I quoted and what I wrote. There are polar watches that have GPS and Bluetooth that last much longer than A watch. I get that it does more but what is truly useful? And of all the stuff you listed, it's all happening except the screen. So why not use e-ink and have pretty much the same functionality with an always on low power screen?

Then you should contact Apple and ask them why the battery doesn't last as long. I'm sure their answer will be close to what I posted.
[doublepost=1460175942][/doublepost]
mildocjr, nice write up,...

But quartz does not power a watch. The oscillating crystal is made of quartz -- as electric current is fed into the crystal, it vibrates thanks to the piezoelectric nature of quartz.

The crystal is shaped like a tiny tuning fork, fine-tuned with a laser, and vibrates at a certain frequency, around 32 kHz. A small IC counts the vibrations and advances the clock appropriately.

Btw, the AW contains a quartz timekeeping circuit, too. Thermocompensated and tightly monitored, it keeps great time even if it never connects to one of Apple's time servers.

Thank's for the clarification.
 
Many sports watches are mountable on handlebars for cycling and so are able to display speed/pace/distance etc without having to move or touch the screen. The Apple watch isn't really for cyclists that want to be able to do that.
Kind of a shame, since the strap setup would make mounting it so easy!
 
Tell me this --

Why does the display need to be on in this pic?
0682e47ce50cfb25e40ac03623536f2a.jpg
 
I'm indifferent, I don't see why other people should need to see my watch face. I wish Apple would give us a choice as to how long the watch face displays. In winter with a load of layers on, the face can turn off before you push enough of them up to see the face. 5 or 10 seconds longer would certainly be a help.
 
Tell me this --

Why does the display need to be on in this pic?
0682e47ce50cfb25e40ac03623536f2a.jpg

1. Other people viewing the watch (from your left or in front) only see an ugly black square instead of a nice watch face.

2. The display is unlikely to activate from this position. Unfortunately, you can't just twist the wrist to activate it. You have to raise the arm up as well, which is awkward when you're already raised part of the way.

Even if you did activate the display, you're still stuck with an annoying delay before you can see anything (this could be easily remedied in the software if Apple desired... You just have to accept a few more unintended activations which might slightly affect battery life. A sensitivity option in Settings could let the user decide what's important to them, though.).
 
I'm indifferent, I don't see why other people should need to see my watch face. I wish Apple would give us a choice as to how long the watch face displays. In winter with a load of layers on, the face can turn off before you push enough of them up to see the face. 5 or 10 seconds longer would certainly be a help.
You can at least set it to show for either 15 or 70 seconds after tapping (Settings -> General -> Wake Screen…); I think the 70 seconds option is for people who want to time things for a full minute.
 
Even if you did activate the display, you're still stuck with an annoying delay before you can see anything (this could be easily remedied in the software if Apple desired... You just have to accept a few more unintended activations which might slightly affect battery life. A sensitivity option in Settings could let the user decide what's important to them, though.).
I like to think it would be possible to have the watch "learn" the wearer's preferred viewing position, maybe by tracking how often you tap it and at what angle, then adding a frequently-tapped angle to a Probably Wants To See The Time list that gets stored internally…

Awkward description, but does it make sense?

I'll also bet not many of you have noticed that it often knows to turn on when you're lying in bed and bring it to your face to see the time. I didn't think about it until after I started wearing it as a silent alarm clock and realized the display activated on its own when I looked for the time (and weather) even though it was basically upside down.
 
Oh, and this point:

1. Other people viewing the watch (from your left or in front) only see an ugly black square instead of a nice watch face.

This only matters if you're wearing the watch for other people instead of yourself.
 
You can at least set it to show for either 15 or 70 seconds after tapping (Settings -> General -> Wake Screen…); I think the 70 seconds option is for people who want to time things for a full minute.

How about staying back lit as long as a person wants to look at it, like a normal watch face, without having to constantly touch it? A FaceTime camera would go a long way toward solving that annoying problem.

Oh, and this point:

This only matters if you're wearing the watch for other people instead of yourself.

Just to be clear, Are you judging others here?

Vanity aside, I routinely appreciate that others wear visible watch faces that I can see on their arms to read the time as I don't regularly wear a watch, and in some cases wouldn't want to be so rude and obvious as to check my own in some settings, which requires an arm movement, or touch of the watch, and then an obvious lighting up of the the face, much less checking my iPhone, which may be in my pocket if I were wearing the watch.
 
I'd love a always one display. There are many times when I want to check the time and the screen won't turn on. Try lying on your back with your arms behind your head. Now check your watch. It doesn't recognize that as a gesture to trigger the screen and that's just one example. I might be carrying heavy groceries and the slight twist I'm able to do to check my watch is not enough to trigger it.

If batteries allowed it it would be nice with a screen that was on all the time, not talking about the black and white mode some android watches have. And if you take it off the screen would shut off.

They should make the raise to wake feature more sensitive and add a simple digital watch that's always there for the time being.
 
They should make the raise to wake feature more sensitive and add a simple digital watch that's always there for the time being.
It was more sensitive when the watch first came out and customers were complaining that it came on all the time. I forgot which update made it less sensitive.
 
Well, you answered one question anyway. -- yeah, you do judge people. Enough said.
I don't need to "judge people" if they take offense to the idea of wearing a watch for vanity's sake. If that's the case, they're too busy judging themselves.
 
I give you one word always on display is NOT good idea. Privacy.

I use module with calendar in middle row during work every work day, so I could see my meeting room with just flick of wrist. Always on display will allow other to see my next meeting detail too easy.
 
Last edited:
First Impressions Count: The Business Value Of Dressing For Success
Can't read it; Forbes still doesn't like the fact I've installed ad blockers.

The AW is hardly as ugly as, say, a piece of concrete, right?

And if you're going to read into it, wouldn't an AW say, "I'm a well-connected professional who's on top of the latest technology and seeks the advantage of trying new things."?
 
I have 3 blockers installed and can read it.

Can't read it; Forbes still doesn't like the fact I've installed ad blockers.

The AW is hardly as ugly as, say, a piece of concrete, right?

And if you're going to read into it, wouldn't an AW say, "I'm a well-connected professional who's on top of the latest technology and seeks the advantage of trying new things."?
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.