Always on display, no. Unless it's just a simple time like the Low power mode.....probably still no.
Quicker and more reliable raise to see, yes
Quicker and more reliable raise to see, yes
Just no. Read the post I quoted and what I wrote. There are polar watches that have GPS and Bluetooth that last much longer than A watch. I get that it does more but what is truly useful? And of all the stuff you listed, it's all happening except the screen. So why not use e-ink and have pretty much the same functionality with an always on low power screen?
mildocjr, nice write up,...
But quartz does not power a watch. The oscillating crystal is made of quartz -- as electric current is fed into the crystal, it vibrates thanks to the piezoelectric nature of quartz.
The crystal is shaped like a tiny tuning fork, fine-tuned with a laser, and vibrates at a certain frequency, around 32 kHz. A small IC counts the vibrations and advances the clock appropriately.
Btw, the AW contains a quartz timekeeping circuit, too. Thermocompensated and tightly monitored, it keeps great time even if it never connects to one of Apple's time servers.
Kind of a shame, since the strap setup would make mounting it so easy!Many sports watches are mountable on handlebars for cycling and so are able to display speed/pace/distance etc without having to move or touch the screen. The Apple watch isn't really for cyclists that want to be able to do that.
Tell me this --
Why does the display need to be on in this pic?
![]()
Must be a pointless meeting if everyone is looking at each other's watches.Because I am in a meeting with other suits.
Must be a pointless meeting if everyone is looking at each other's watches.
Tell me this --
Why does the display need to be on in this pic?
![]()
You can at least set it to show for either 15 or 70 seconds after tapping (Settings -> General -> Wake Screen…); I think the 70 seconds option is for people who want to time things for a full minute.I'm indifferent, I don't see why other people should need to see my watch face. I wish Apple would give us a choice as to how long the watch face displays. In winter with a load of layers on, the face can turn off before you push enough of them up to see the face. 5 or 10 seconds longer would certainly be a help.
I like to think it would be possible to have the watch "learn" the wearer's preferred viewing position, maybe by tracking how often you tap it and at what angle, then adding a frequently-tapped angle to a Probably Wants To See The Time list that gets stored internally…Even if you did activate the display, you're still stuck with an annoying delay before you can see anything (this could be easily remedied in the software if Apple desired... You just have to accept a few more unintended activations which might slightly affect battery life. A sensitivity option in Settings could let the user decide what's important to them, though.).
1. Other people viewing the watch (from your left or in front) only see an ugly black square instead of a nice watch face.
You can at least set it to show for either 15 or 70 seconds after tapping (Settings -> General -> Wake Screen…); I think the 70 seconds option is for people who want to time things for a full minute.
Oh, and this point:
This only matters if you're wearing the watch for other people instead of yourself.
Well, you answered one question anyway. -- yeah, you do judge people. Enough said.Why don't you wear a watch? Why do you have to bum the time off of others' wrists?
It was more sensitive when the watch first came out and customers were complaining that it came on all the time. I forgot which update made it less sensitive.They should make the raise to wake feature more sensitive and add a simple digital watch that's always there for the time being.
I don't need to "judge people" if they take offense to the idea of wearing a watch for vanity's sake. If that's the case, they're too busy judging themselves.Well, you answered one question anyway. -- yeah, you do judge people. Enough said.
I don't need to "judge people" if they take offense to the idea of wearing a watch for vanity's sake. If that's the case, they're too busy judging themselves.
Can't read it; Forbes still doesn't like the fact I've installed ad blockers.First Impressions Count: The Business Value Of Dressing For Success
Can't read it; Forbes still doesn't like the fact I've installed ad blockers.
The AW is hardly as ugly as, say, a piece of concrete, right?
And if you're going to read into it, wouldn't an AW say, "I'm a well-connected professional who's on top of the latest technology and seeks the advantage of trying new things."?
Sounds like the ad blockers aren't working.I have 3 blockers installed and can read it.
Sounds like the ad blockers aren't working.