Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Actually, as it is now, the iPhone's processor is underclocked.

This is pure speculation. Samsung does make a similar looking 600 MHz part, as well as slower parts, and there is no published information saying which bin of parts Apple is buying from. They might have negotiated a great price on some middle bins which have much higher yields. The overclockers might have just gotten lucky with a fast part on a cold day.
 
Wirelessly posted (iPhone 3G (white): Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 3_0 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/528.18 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Mobile/7A312g Safari/528.16)

Masquerade said:
actually overclocking is an easter egg in itunes, i've using it since day one :D

Huh?
 
They won't give you a free upgrade to better-performing hardware. They won't upclock.

But if it comes to making OS 3.0, or 4.0 for that matter, running smoothly on the older models, wouldn't they?

I mean we all know that SJ hates nothing more than a tarnished image and index fingers... probably he hates 'buttons' more.. cant be sure! {:
 
But if it comes to making OS 3.0, or 4.0 for that matter, running smoothly on the older models, wouldn't they?

I mean we all know that SJ hates nothing more than a tarnished image and index fingers... probably he hates 'buttons' more.. cant be sure! {:

Well, Mac OS 4 was the first to not be able to run on the original Macintosh... who's to say that iPhone OS 4 won't be the first not to run on the original iPhone?
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.