That's not exactly what's going on here. They have definitely not relinquished control of their infotainment systems. They have augmented them to allow CarPlay and Android Auto to interface with their systems. You can't use CP/AA without MyLink (GM's infotainment system) or an aftermarket unit. CP/AA are basically system overlays that are completely dependent on the phone. I think some of us are making incorrect assumptions of what CP/AA actually entail.I'm glad to finally see a critical mass of automakers relinquish control of their radio screens. So many "infotainment" systems are pure garbage. Let the computer companies make the computers, and the car companies make the cars.
I hope people realize they can install CarPlay in any existing car, you don't have to buy new just to get CarPlay.
I don't think this would surprise anyone. I know I myself already decided I'm not buying a new car without new technology called CarPlay and I guess many others feel the same way.
Though I do think it would be nice if you could install CarPlay as an aftermarket mod for existing car owners.
GM is not one of those.Many only support CarPlay... which is fine by me. Apple had a year head start on Google anyway
I'm glad to finally see a critical mass of automakers relinquish control of their radio screens. So many "infotainment" systems are pure garbage. Let the computer companies make the computers, and the car companies make the cars.
I took my 2015 GM SUV in for service and a part was backordered, so I was given a 2016 model to drive over the last week, and it has CarPlay.
It has been fun to play with, especially messages, but honestly, it isn't a must have feature. With BT and my Onstar app, my iPhone 6s is really integrated into my current GM Infotainment system already.
Siri functionality is for me a better option in the car driving environment, CarPlay only seems to add the ability to visually see info, that while driving is more a distraction than anything else.
It's not a software update for the vast majority of older vehicles. It's an aftermarket head unit. Pioneer seems to be the leading vendor right now. Some of the newer model cars may be able to make it work with a software update. That's predicated on manufacturers wanting to do it as opposed to selling you a new car.Is this true? Because I have asked several people and have been told it's not just a software update. Why it wouldn't be, I don't know, but that is what I have been told.
It's not a software update for the vast majority of older vehicles. It's an aftermarket head unit. Pioneer seems to be the leading vendor right now. Some of the newer model cars may be able to make it work with a software update. That's predicated on manufacturers wanting to do it as opposed to selling you a new car.![]()
Porsche is the first that comes to mind. They rejected Android Auto for their data collection policies, but adopted CarPlay. The CEO specifically cited engine data that was gathered and transmitted back to GoogleGM is not one of those.
http://www.chevrolet.com/culture/article/android-auto-apple-carplay.html
Actually, I'm not familiar with a manufacturer that isn't supporting both. Doesn't mean they don't exist. I just don't know any.
That's not exactly what's going on here. They have definitely not relinquished control of their infotainment systems. They have augmented them to allow CarPlay and Android Auto to interface with their systems. You can't use CP/AA without MyLink (GM's infotainment system) or an aftermarket unit. CP/AA are basically system overlays that are completely dependent on the phone. I think some of us are making incorrect assumptions of what CP/AA actually entail.
As for GM and other car companies, they're happy. They are using CP/AA to upsell trim levels and add-ons. It's what they do.
Does this include Apple and Google?
Eh? CarPlay features Siri heavily. The whole thing is not just hands free but also eyes free. Did you actually use CarPlay?
I forgot about Porsche.Porsche is the first that comes to mind. They rejected Android Auto for their data collection policies, but adopted CarPlay. The CEO specifically cited engine data that was gathered and transmitted back to Google
Our new Volt came with CarPlay. I must say, given my skepticism about GM and US-made cars more generally, so far the car is virtually flawless. The one exception, sadly, is CarPlay, which often drops the connection, has weird glitches like a sideways screen, is erratic when Siri is listening, and sometimes auto-lauches the music even when something else (eg, maps) is running. Never thought I'd see the world where GM software is elegant and Apple is the source of all the glitches.
Yes, I used it.
What I was trying to convey, was that CarPlay adds very little, except the ability to see information(maps,messages etc..), the system heavily relies on Siri, which if you have a newer car with a "intelligent" system and a phone connection either via BT or wired you probably have 95% of what CarPlay has.
In my GM Intellilink(sp?) Siri is a push of a steering wheel button away. Thus giving me all the same control, I would have if I had CarPlay, the only difference is that I don't get a screen overlay that looks like an Apple product and the ability to see that information on my vehicles screen.
I can still create/reply and be read message, use my phone maps and make call, and have music played, with the push of a button and Siri voice commands..
it's funny that you say CarPlay is eyes free, because all that CarPlay adds for me is the ability to see it.
Lets see how many extra Americans get killed on the road because of using Car Play. Most are bad enough drivers without adding this to the crash rate.
I'm glad to finally see a critical mass of automakers relinquish control of their radio screens. So many "infotainment" systems are pure garbage. Let the computer companies make the computers, and the car companies make the cars.
Lets see how many extra Americans get killed on the road because of using Car Play. Most are bad enough drivers without adding this to the crash rate.