I don't care if they add a bajillion more of these Apps/Channels if they all require a cable subscription. Doesn't anyone get it?
We don't care about access these through Apple TV via a cable subscription.
We want: a) to access through Apple TV with no cable subscription & b) to be able to pick and choose the channels ala carte in a new, industry disrupting business model
I think we'll get a with Apple's new rumored streaming service, but the cable executives wouldn't relent to apple on point b. So we're going to be stuck with bundles forever, apparently.
But...but... it's a smaller bundle that's cheaper? So what - it's still a bundle - this is an evolution rather than a revolution to the way we watch TV. I was promised that Apple would revolutionize the industry, not slap on a new coat of paint to an existing model.
Speak for yourself. I do care to access cable through Apple TV. First, I get it through Wifi with a dependable but small piece of hardware that I can control with my phone or watch (which means controlling it with Siri soon enough). Second, the money I pay is directed mores specifically at channels I watch. But I'm still going to pay. I'm not living in a fantasy land where I pay less money to the content providers in general but get better and on demand service of whatever I want.