Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
From experience...it's much easier to gain access via security questions than brute force. True, some of them may be from iCloud, but I doubt it was obtained with brute force.

Phishing scams are rampant, only one needs to work to gain access. That's even more frequent than the security question.

As for the security question, stars should not provide a standard googleable answer obviously.
 
the real question is what is apple's definition of weak, and why are they allowing what they consider to be weak passwords

internal security audit should nip stuff in the butt like this

Well, everyone is allowing weak passwords including amazon, google, dropbox etc. They more or less have the exact same standards set as minimum.
 
Security questions are not that hard if the celebrity isn't smart enough with the answers.

I never said it was hard to guess security questions. If they used social engineering to find their username and guessed their security questions, wouldn't changing the password send an e-mail to the hacked user? Surprised we haven't heard about that.
 
No. The victim is not to blame. I still can't believe the responses in this thread and the other one. A crime was committed against several individuals. Think about that.

There isn't only one blame to assign. You don't have to choose one or the other to blame.

They both can be at fault.

The perpetrator for hacking and committing the crime. Very bad, lots of fault to assign to this person.

The celeb for not understanding the risks of taking pictures on a internet synced device and or choosing a very poor password. Derpy move, you are in small part to blame for your poor choices.
 
So basically hollywood/music stars are like that dumb broad you can pick up in a bar only with money?
 
Phishing scams are rampant, only one needs to work to gain access. That's even more frequent than the security question.

As for the security question, stars should not provide a standard googleable answer obviously.

Not googleable, but with celebrities social engineering is always the main route to get security questions.
 
I never said it was hard to guess security questions. If they used social engineering to find their username and guessed their security questions, wouldn't changing the password send an e-mail to the hacked user? Surprised we haven't heard about that.

It would. But these things are usually done when people are known to be not checking their emails, like when they are asleep. You only need couple of minutes.

And we probably won't hear about that. No hacked celebrity will come off and explain how they were hacked.
 
This is way not likely an iCloud find my iPhone hack...

This was way more likely, ultimately, an authorize my ATV hack. First target iPhones in the LA area code and likely iPhone prefixes. Find out which ones respond to iMessage for SMS. This will show you iPhones. Then phish passwords, lots of ways to do this, creating a submit your password dialog on that phone. Possibly a zero day on iMessage, or maybe on macs in general, or maybe you're an Apple Genius. Try say an ad for the LA Times. Once you phished for the password in the right place, "authorize" an ATV for that account. Ask for the Photostream. Voila, all the pictures on that account. From the phone, straight to your computer (ATV). Do it through a VPN account to hide your actual IP. Randomly trying to find accounts and passwords is WAY too time consuming and unfocused an attack.
 
So an "attack" by guessing passwords, directed to only celebrities and only those using iPhones and just a week before the next iPhone announcement. I feel like the purpose, target, sample and timing of this attack is way too "interesting". Somebody must be trying real hard to make Apple look bad before September 9th...
 
Apple will still get sued by at least one of the 100 or so celeb women who had their nude photos leaked. If the case actually goes anywhere is another thing
 
This don't blame the victim thing is too disconnected from reality.

Let me put my home entertainment gear in the back of an open truck and park it in a bad part of Detroit while I go eat lunch in a restaurant.

Now tell me how I'm not, in some part, to blame when I get back and all of the electronics are gone. People would say to me, that was really dumb that you did that, and what were you thinking?

You make bad choices, you are in part to blame. The internet is a dangerous place and you need to harden your security against it. Failure to do so puts you and your information at risk. If this was a problem caused by using weak passwords, like your dogs names or kids birthday, then you are in part to blame for not doing your part.

Don't be dumb, if you are, you deserve the ridicule. What was John Wayne's quote? "Life is hard; it's harder if you're stupid."

I'm not giving these folks a free pass if it was bad password choices. They chose to be on the stage and in the spotlight. You darn sure better be making good choices when it comes to securing your information because the wolves are going to be out there looking to exploit you.

False equivalency. Nothing was left open on their accounts. Their privacy was being protected by a password, which someone committed an illegal offense by hacking into it.

clearly you're assuming, he/she meant only women by "all looks". you should probably ask yourself, why you thought that.

Given the context that only female accounts were hacked, it's a pretty safe bet.

Why can't we do both? To be honest my credit card information was stolen last month and all I did blame was myself. From now on whenever I shop online I use my banks "virtual credit card" system and never ever give my actual credit card info to any online store, other than the major players like amazon.

We don't do both because the victim isn't in the wrong. You victim-blaming yourself is different from millions of people victim-blaming one person.
 
they are full of ****, instead of telling the truth, they deny their fault, why the hell they patch the bruteforce hole of find-my-iphone yesterday if it isn't their fault??!
 
So an "attack" by guessing passwords, directed to only celebrities and only those using iPhones and just a week before the next iPhone announcement. I feel like the purpose, target, sample and timing of this attack is way too "interesting". Somebody must be trying real hard to make Apple look bad before September 9th...

First of all, the attack did not happen on August 31st. The pictures were leaked that day but attacks probably happened throughout months or maybe years. These pictures have been sitting in someones laptop for a long time.

Second, some of the celebs are not using iPhones.

The Apple bash in some news outlets could have been intentional or just click bait.
 
It would. But these things are usually done when people are known to be not checking their emails, like when they are asleep. You only need couple of minutes.

Right...I'm just saying that this would verify the type of hack, not that it would have helped prevent it. If they didn't get an e-mail then they probably brute forced the password. If they did get an e-mail then it was most likely the security question scenario
 
We don't do both because the victim isn't in the wrong. You victim-blaming yourself is different from millions of people victim-blaming one person.

How is it different? Just because more people blame one person doesn't change anything. It's only because more people are aware of the crime.
 
There isn't only one blame to assign. You don't have to choose one or the other to blame.

They both can be at fault.

The perpetrator for hacking and committing the crime. Very bad, lots of fault to assign to this person.

The celeb for not understanding the risks of taking pictures on a internet synced device and or choosing a very poor password. Derpy move, you are in small part to blame for your poor choices.

The problem is rooted deeper than a security issue. Ask yourself why only women's photos were stolen. And the significance of why so many posters here who are male are quick to point the finger.

Anyone (not just celebs) should have strong passwords. But that doesn't mean that someone should force their way "in" and then exploit those photos as if they had any right to do so. Stealing - that's one issue. Exploiting them (and asking for money to boot) is another. And those that click on the photos only perpetuate the culture that makes it acceptable.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.