Wifi router market has been dying for some time. After people initially bought one, there's little reason to buy a new one for years.
Now to revive sales, router makers are coming up with these new setups and pushing them as must-haves.
The reality is that a standard 802.11n router is more than fast enough for almost all users. Very very few will see any benefit from these new routers. But that won't stop them from making you believe that you'll see huge benefits from dropping $500 on a new setup.
Routers are popular. I don't know where your assumption comes from.
[doublepost=1483458439][/doublepost]
Anyone know if these systems (Google or Linksys) can be configured as access points instead of routers? I have a VPN router I don't intend on replacing. I need something that can cover a large house but be just access points.
Avoid Google Wifi for now it doesn't bridge. Eero and Luma bridge. I think the Orbi does as well.
[doublepost=1483459208][/doublepost]
I switched from Apple to eero in September. This product by linksys is basically the same and priced the same. I can tell you that my eero mesh network is amazingly better than the Apple setup I had. It will be interesting to see how this compares to eero, which was the best I could find at the time and am happy to have purchased. The other great thing with eero is that they have upgrade the product twice via software/firmware pushes so they actually are getting better.
This should be faster than Eero which is AC1200 Dual Band.