One advantage is thickness. With current foldables, the closed device is twice as thick as when open but not so with a scrollable that maintains its thickness. While a folding phone like the Fold does protect its screen when closed, it also needs another screen to be usable in that state. Not so with a scrollable where only one screen is necessary. In theory, that could reduce the production cost, increase overall reliability (main screen aside) and simplify the OS and application integration. We're all used to single screen phones, so shifting to a scrollable like the LG seems an easier transition.
Some disadvantages:
- rolling mechanism seems a very likely failure point
- excess battery draw from rolling (and larger screen), needs special low battery handling like auto-close before running out
- need for ability to manually close in the event of auto-close failure (?)
- dust and larger particles entering the device when closing could damage both the screen and rollers
- complexity for application developers to dynamically/smoothly accommodate a slowly changing screen resolution (different from instant unfolding though that could have its own complex behaviors as well at different angles)
- when extended, the structural integrity of the phone is compromised, but by how much? Imagine dropping today's iPhone vs dropping the LG when it is fully extended
- overall weight to accommodate larger screen material and rollers
Oh my god, at least is funny !! If one day I spot someone in the tram rolling or unrolling a phone I will laugh at his/her face. What is the need that they want to address?!
Totally. Here's but one use case: I like to read the occasional digital comic book and I do that on an iPad. Even with the ability to focus on various panels the experience on my 6.7" iPhone sucks in comparison with the ability to view more or all of the page. Would I like to be able to expand my phone to read a comic book without having to carry an iPad around, especially while commuting? You bet I would. Another is watching a show or movie. Would I rather have the larger image as demonstrated by the LG video when I want it? You bet I would. Then I can return to normal phone size for other activities I'm more comfortable with the smaller size. And I can carry that in my pocket. Huge win.But to throw out the entire paradigm because of a complete lack of vision is just baffling.
It’s like people are stuck in the past and don’t realise tech moves forward...It's so baffling why this keeps coming up, I honestly just don't get the disconnect from reality. Having a tablet sized screen that can shrink and fit into spaces a smartphone can fit is the need. You personally may not have that need, but some of us (I'll bet a LOT of us) would love to have a tablet sized screen that we could carry around as easily as our smartphones. I get that the technology is very alpha and today's solutions aren't the best, and critique of that make sense. But to throw out the entire paradigm because of a complete lack of vision is just baffling.
I agree with everything you wrote but just wanted to comment on this statement. The equivalent of the Fold's narrow view would just be the natural, unexpanded state of the rollable device, assuming it has the narrow form factor of today's phones. I don't particularly see that as an advantage for a second screen, only that it is a necessary byproduct of Samsung's design.The Fold 2 needing 2 screens can be an advantage, in particular when I need a "narrow" phone for stuff such as one handed use.
It was Oppo.Another SmartPhone company has definitely announced similar prototypes months ago. Don’t remember whether it’s XiaoMi or Vivo or Oppo.
And when it gets dropped into water.I'm curious to see the mechanics inside for the scrolling of the screen when dust and dirt enter from the edges.
I agree with everything you wrote but just wanted to comment on this statement. The equivalent of the Fold's narrow view would just be the natural, unexpanded state of the rollable device, assuming it has the narrow form factor of today's phones. I don't particularly see that as an advantage for a second screen, only that it is a necessary byproduct of Samsung's design.