Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
This is great! But will it cost more than their existing 42" OLED HDR TV?
I wish there was a reliable/easy way to use their TVs as HDR display, I've had no luck with several 4K60 HDMI dongles.
 
Hmm, static content on a Oled display...

I do have a LG 55" Oled, I don't worry for burn in on a OLED TV, a display though...
My C7 OLED has just succumbed to burn in although LG are replacing the screen for £250 once the lockdown has finished.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_1451.jpg
    IMG_1451.jpg
    1.7 MB · Views: 142
I have the 34" LG 5K2K 21:9 Ultrawide and used to have the Dell U3415W 34" Ultrawide.

The LG I have is 5120x2160 and the Dell was 3440x1440.

If the new LG is like the Dell, offering 5120x2160, then it is lower PPI than my current 34" LG and likely a higher price point.

I think I'll pass. More money for less pixel density...
 
  • Like
Reactions: WP31
Why is it that there haven’t been many OLED monitors? Why is it a tech reserved for phones and TVs?
Outside of creatives and professionals, who make up a relatively small slice of the overall market, the monitor market is mostly low margin. In addition, Samsung went for the small panel OLED market (mobile devices), and LG Display went for the large panel OLED market (TVs).

Fortunately, there’s actually little difference these days between TVs and monitors, if you want to use the former as the latter. 20-40” monitors will also be the beneficiaries of refined OLED tech. So it’ll be worth the wait.
 
Good..... Thunderbolt daisy-chain. That makes it more feature complete than the stupid Dell design. Whether its a good panel or not, or a good price... no clue.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DeepIn2U
Been dreaming of the day when OLED comes to the 27-32” size so I won’t have to keep going to my TV for reference. I wonder how they tackled burn-in for those multi hour long final cut sessions. I’m assuming this is at least $5000, I’ll wait until I can get one for 999, hopefully less than 5 years from now.

Also, no mention of refresh rate. I’m guessing 60hz because of hdmi 2.0 not 2.1, but 120 like the CX line would be the cherry on top
 
Why is it that there haven’t been many OLED monitors? Why is it a tech reserved for phones and TVs?
It has a lot to do with how they are made and the level of demand. LG OLEDs work differently than Samsung OLED ( RGBW-OLED vs AMOLED to be exact) and LG's method require committing to a range of sizes when they build the assembly line. These smaller OLED screens are only possible now because LG just opened up a second factory that has lines for very big (77+) and very small (sub-50") screens.

I'm actually surprised they've got one THIS small but perhaps after the success of the 48" CX last year they worked some magic. Luckily I can't justify a new screen this year because I love OLED and would put up with the low-PPI to get one of these.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ThisBougieLife
The wait for the perfect monitor continues ...
My wishlist, not that it matters:

* 120+Hz variable
* 4K
* IPS or equivalent
* 28" or bigger
* USB-C hub & power delivery
* Decent HDR (this seems still a mess at the moment)
* Downwards facing ports
* Dell-equivalent quality adjustable stand.

and the big one:

* reasonable price.

Not sure about curved or not, need to get a test after lockdown. Meanwhile I make do with my perfectly fine Dell 2715 27" 1440p 60hz IPS.
 
  • Like
Reactions: phairphan
The UltraFine pro is more than a wee bit disappointing. 4k stretched to 30+ inches isn't UltraFine at all, it is just a 4k OLED television sold as a monitor. If it where 6K it would be a beast, but clearly something had to give, the Apple 6k display remains the best bang for buck for photo editing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MrX8503 and WP31
That 32” ill probably be under the xdr in price

And there would pretty much be no reason at all for anyone to consider the xdr unless your are a fake pro and only use it for productivity and static content.
 
We need a poll:
  1. Have you used a curved monitor
  2. Do you prefer a curved or flat monitor
  3. Your age

My old-man eyes take a while to refocus (it’s called presbyopia kids, and you’ll eventually get there) - curved displays significantly improve the usability of an ultra-widescreen.
1. Yes... love it! I'm using a 34" LG UW
2. Curved for ultra-wides.
3. 54
 
Best news of 2021 so far! especially for HDR content creation this could be perfect if brightness can be sustained at 1000nits. Even SDR content benefits, watching a dark scene on the Pro Display in a very dim environment shows blooming which will not occur with OLED. But I doubt we'll see Apple down resolution to 4K from a 5K 27" or 6K 32" unless they swing marketing as higher resolution LED / perfect black OLED choice.
 
  • Like
Reactions: kepler20b
Why are monitor manufacturers so allergic to 200+ PPI? Make a pretty panel with high pixel density and high end Apple users will buy it. You could charge a lot for this. Is Apple sending hired goons around LG and Dell to stop them doing this or something? A baffling gap in the market for a few years now.

There's essentially nothing like a 6K 32" display available that isn't the crazy expensive Apple XDR. Make a regular one for $2000, it would sell like crazy. I'd buy it!

The LG displays Apple sells which are basically the great iMac panels in an LG shell look hideous in my opinion. Not sure why something like this can't exist in an Apple Cinema Display form factor.
Not many devices support more than 5k with a single cable... thus market is too small -- its due to an obvious business reason, if you ask me.
 
Not many devices support more than 5k with a single cable... thus market is too small -- its due to an obvious business reason, if you ask me.

In 2021 Macs from the entry level 13" Macbook Air all the way up to the Mac Pro do. Not really that niche if you ask me.

Sure not every casual user will be interested in such a display but $1000+ monitors have never appealed to casual users anyway but that category has been a thing for 20+ years.

I still use a 30" Apple Cinema Display. It came out in 2004 and needed a special type of dual layered DVI to be developed with it because regular DVI didn't have the bandwidth for 2560x1600. It cost half of what the the XDR does and still looks great today cosmetically. If there was a market for that in 2004, there is definitely a market for 3rd party displays with merely the same display features as an entry level 27" iMac in 2021!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mr.PT
I wish LG didn't keep going for white rear panels. I want to get one in the office at work but it would draw attention to my screen being different from others! lol
 
  • Like
Reactions: WP31
In 2021 Macs from the entry level 13" Macbook Air all the way up to the Mac Pro do. Not really that niche if you ask me.

Sure not every casual user will be interested in such a display but $1000+ monitors have never appealed to casual users anyway but that category has been a thing for 20+ years.

I still use a 30" Apple Cinema Display. It came out in 2004 and needed a special type of dual layered DVI to be developed with it because regular DVI didn't have the bandwidth for 2560x1600. It cost half of what the the XDR does and still looks great today cosmetically. If there was a market for that in 2004, there is definitely a market for 3rd party displays with merely the same display features as an entry level 27" iMac in 2021!

Your ACD has probably turned yellow and/or stained if you haven't replaced the CCFL on time. At this point it's unobtainable.
 
That 39.7" ultrawide looks like it could be pretty sweet for X-Plane.

Looking forward to seeing the price.
 
Your ACD has probably turned yellow and/or stained if you haven't replaced the CCFL on time. At this point it's unobtainable.

I'm not advocating people buy old 30" ACD's, quite the opposite I'm literally looking to upgrade but can't find a worthy monitor!
 
  • Like
Reactions: WP31
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.