I'm not the person you're replying to but I do find generative/LLM-based "AI" to be useless. Why? Because it fails horribly at pretty much every task I give it. Just the other day I was trying to turn a screenshot of a weekly event schedule into an ical file or even just a more usable text file. I tried ChatGPT, Claude, Copilot, and Gemini, and each of them fell short of what I was asking them or messed up int heir own special way. It wasn't that they couldn't get the info out of the screenshot or interpret it, it was that even when given step by step instructions, example formats, multiple attempts, etc, they simply couldn't do the job, or if they did manage to output things it was full of mistakes they seemingly couldn't correct.AI is useless? Why? Explain. I am genuinely interested in your position.
Yeah I hate that to.So many people write "to" when they mean "too". It's infuriating not to have an opportunity to correct them in places like this forum because it's "against the rules".
The quality of human-written text on the internet had degraded over the past 20 years, which ingrains the laziness into everyday language.
So many people write "to" when they mean "too". It's infuriating not to have an opportunity to correct them in places like this forum because it's "against the rules".
AI-generated text will begin to expose people to correctly-written text, which should help raise the knowledge level again. It's a good thing.