Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

MacRumors

macrumors bot
Original poster
Apr 12, 2001
68,713
39,655


Apple could offer a cheaper version of its Apple Vision Pro headset by making the device reliant on a tethered iPhone or Mac, according to Bloomberg's Mark Gurman.

Apple-Vision-Pro-Box-and-Ref-Feature-2.jpg

Last week, a report claimed that Apple had suspended work on the second-generation Apple Vision Pro in order to focus on bringing a cheaper model to market. However, Gurman claims Apple shifted resources to developing a cheaper model even before the Vision Pro was released, and he has now offered some more details on how Apple plans to build a more affordable spatial computing unit.

Writing in his latest Power On newsletter, Gurman says that a prototype lower-cost headset, codenamed N107, has a narrower field of view compared to Vision Pro.

Apple is also considering making this version more reliant on a tethered Mac or iPhone. "That would let Apple save money on the processing power and components needed to make the Vision Pro a fully standalone product," he argues.

Gurman says that Apple is still struggling to bring the cost down while retaining key features. But if it can, Apple plans to launch the cheaper headset as early as the end of 2025. Indeed, this has been the plan "since before the Vision Pro was unveiled last year," he adds.

Gurman doubled down on his reaction to last week's report by noting that Apple has no plans to abandon the high end of the headset market, and while it's "less of a priority," Apple is still working on a second-generation Vision Pro, codenamed N109.

This model is said to look similar to the current Vision Pro, but has a faster processor and improvements to the external cameras. The company reportedly plans to release the Apple Vision Pro 2 by the end of 2026 at the earliest.

Article Link: Cheaper Apple Vision Headset Might Require a Tethered iPhone or Mac
 
This certainly helps but their greatest challenge still is coming up with compelling use cases.

Perhaps a really cheaper price will compel people to use it as a giant screen.
Yeah, but use cases are created by developers through their apps. In order for developers to create apps for Vision Pro, there should be some sufficiently wide user base to justify the time and the effort. If Apple sends 5,000 free units to the 5,000 top developers in the App Store, and further provide extensive online training for the developers kits and APK, apps will start poping out one by one at a very high rate. Currently, developers cant justify the expense of buying a Vision Pro, let alone dedicated hundreds of hours to port their apps and take advantage of the new functionality the hardware has to offer.
 
- Remove expensive CNC machined aluminium and use plastic.
- Remove the external display and glass front.
- Remove battery and storage case from the box.
- Remove M1 chip and let the iPhone handle all the compute power needed.
=
Vision for less than 1000$
 
- Remove expensive CNC machined aluminium and use plastic.
- Remove the external display and glass front.
- Remove battery and storage case from the box.
- Remove M1 chip and let the iPhone handle all the compute power needed.
=
Vision for less than 1000$
Do you know how hot this thing runs? It needs the glass and aluminum to stay cool. The greatest cost is the screens
 
- Remove expensive CNC machined aluminium and use plastic.
- Remove the external display and glass front.
- Remove battery and storage case from the box.
- Remove M1 chip and let the iPhone handle all the compute power needed.
=
Vision for less than 1000$
It’s already available…
 
The Vision Pro is a monitor. That's it. It is, at-best, a monitor with built-in media consumption capabilities, like a TV, but without native apps from the most popular streaming services like Netflix or Amazon.

If you're tethering it to a mac or a phone, then you can just use the screen on the phone or mac. Even an iPad as a second monitor using Sidecar is still a cheaper, lightweight, more portable option, and one that can actually be used as a stand-alone device.

The problem with Vision Pro isn't the price. It's a product with no real use-case.

I'm surprised Apple haven't just created a Samsung Galaxy VR style headset where you just drop a super-spec iPhone Pro Max into it.

galaxy VR.jpg
 
This is hilarious 😂 and people will pay for it!
Apple hopes people will pay for it. That's one of it's goals as a company -- make products and services people will pay for. So if people will pay, that's great news.

Be aware that this device really isn't what people at Apple wants most people to buy. That's coming out 5 or so years from now. The AVP is the tech demo. The next, less expensive version is to get some more people on board with 'Apple Vision'. After that are the products that more people will likely buy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: FriendlyMackle
With all of those expensive optics (& that custom R1 coprocessor which will presumably still be needed), I'd have thought that the cost of including a standard M-series SoC and some flash would be pretty negligible...

My problem with the Apple Vision concept is that Apple's proposed "serious" uses - augmented reality for translation etc., replace your computer screen, immersive video conferencing - require you to spend 8 hours a day with the thing strapped to your head and won't really be practical until technology exists to make it an order of magnitude smaller and lighter. In a business environment there are always going to be a couple of colleagues who won't/can't wear goggles (some for valid reasons, others out of stubbornness - and good luck telling the two apart).
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.