Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Here ya go. Like Ireland's drawing, but I ditched the camera. You could add games there... iPods need games...

I made it so the screen is just a tiny bit wider than the casing of the iPod nano. That's enough for accurate thumb control. We only have 3 columns.

3bnrvr
 
There will definitely be an iPod Nano at some point. The future is all about convergence and Apple knows this. Soon there won't be any iPods that don't have the ability to make phone calls.
 
I wonder if the iPhone nano, if real, would still be limited to AT&T only. It would be great if it wasn't.
 
nano screen IS big enough for keyboard

If you're wondering if the iPod nano's screen is big enough for a multi-touch on-screen keyboard, it is.

In "landscape" mode, the nano is wider than the iPhone's screen. It is taller than the iPhone's keyboard, when it is in landscape mode in Safari. That means that text messaging, IM, and email, is definitely possible. And those will all work fine on EDGE.

To those who say that Apple will wait a good long time before introducing another product at a new price point, I think you're wrong. This is not the mp3 player market, which Apple made what it is. The cell-phone market is established, and has many many many offerings for under $300. Hell, it has a lot of offerings for free, and these phones increasingly play music.

Apple wants to compete in that market space. There is room to make the nano a little bigger, physically. (Really, I just held my nano up to my ear, and I don't like it. It needs to be thicker, and probably a bit longer and wider, too).The only question is how many features can they provide for $300/$400 this holiday season.

If they can give it visual voicemail, multitouch, IM, and email, they will sell them. Lots of them. Tell the parents they don't have to buy Johnny a separate iPod and cell phone, and they'll bite. Apple makes products people want to spend money on. They proved that (yet again) on June 29th.
 
During the past weeks when my friends asked me if I'm going to get an iPhone I've always replied, "I'm waiting for the iPhone Nano." It just makes way too much sense.

1. Who has ever paid $500-$600 for a cell phone until now? There's a huge market that they're leaving behind (ie the entire market up until now.)
2. The iPhone is big and heavy compared to phones like the RAZR, SLVR, etc. regardless of functionality. That is not Apple's trademark.
3. I'd love one-touch functionality during a call to put people on hold, merge, speaker, or add a caller with one touch. No phone I know does that.
4. No phone has their touchscreen patented scroll to go through contact lists, photos, music (and I bet video) so quickly, efficiently and beautifully either.
5. There's a whole population out there that doesn't want email on their phone, including myself. I mean, you gotta have a life sometime.
6. No phone has visual voicemail that I know of.
7. Put all that in a nano-sized work of art with a 2.0 megapixel camera for $249-$299 (ideally $199) and I'd switch yesterday.

Right but can they do it cheap enough?? They say the current iPhone costs Apple about $250 to make, can they make the nano phone cheaper and still make money? I don't think it HAS to have a touch screen but it does have to have visual voice mail, a camera and text. 4 to 8 gig of memory would be nice to, otherwise I think it would simply be another phone.

c'mon Apple do it
 
take it with a grain of salt

These so called experts also claim that the profit margin on the iPhone is not as high as the firm that took one apart claimed that it was. They pulled one apart and got a 55% profit margin. The financial types said that the margin was just average, like all the other cell phone markers. Let me be the first to say that there is nothing average about this device. And the keyboard works great. Used it for this posting.
 
I took Ireland's idea and photoshopped it.
I had to give the SMS button a new color... two greens next to each other just doesnt work :)
Oh, and yeah... I changed AT&T to Sprint. I like Sprint :D
haha.

iphonenano.jpg
 
I took Ireland's idea and photoshopped it.
I had to give the SMS button a new color... two greens next to each other just doesnt work :)
Oh, and yeah... I changed AT&T to Sprint. I like Sprint :D
haha.

linked image

damn, you're better than me at PS:)

The iPhone looks so clunky and crowded with icons compared to its imaginative little sibling. Who needs google earth, mail and safari all the time?
Come to think on it: thi might actually be what we get in Europe: the iPhone nano. 3G Problem solved.
 
damn, you're better than me at PS:)

The iPhone looks so clunky and crowded with icons compared to its imaginative little sibling. Who needs google earth, mail and safari all the time?
Come to think on it: thi might actually be what we get in Europe: the iPhone nano. 3G Problem solved.

I like it a lot but we need safari for extra programs, not for the web.
 
Agree on the BS call. What price break do people think will be on the 4 and 8GB by Christmas anyway? How does that leave room for another lower priced unit.

As far as what you want, I think you'll be getting it soon enough. Welcome to the video iPod.

Yeah, but the million dollar question is when?? There's another couple months til the festive season, and if AAPL can get this baby out by like October, I'm willing to bet my soul there are a lot of folks out there who are williing to sell theirs to get one of these for Christmas-ish :rolleyes:
 
And will people stop with the photoshops?? I mean, guys, c'mon. From experience, those things are nowhere near actuality so why do we keep doing it, year after year? :rolleyes:
 
Sorry if this has already been posted. Check it: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/19682602/



MSNBC is reporting it as truth. Usually when a big news source posts something, it's for reals, yes? Anyway, the article:



Apple plans cheaper, Nano-based phone
Chang said follow to iPhone could be priced at $300 or lower


Reuters: Updated: 1:52 p.m. PT July 9, 2007


Apple plans to launch a cheaper version of the iPhone in the fourth quarter that could be based on the ultra-slim iPod Nano music player, according to a JP Morgan report.

Kevin Chang, a JP Morgan analyst based in Taiwan, cited people in the supply channel that he did not name and an application with the U.S. Patent and Trademark office for his report.

Apple filed a patent application document that refers to a multifunctional handheld device with a circular touch pad control, similar to the Nano’s scroll wheel.

Apple did not respond to requests for comment.

Long lines of people turned out on June 29 when U.S. sales began for the iPhone, a mobile phone with a music player and Web browser. Analysts have estimated that sales in the first weekend were as high as 700,000 units.

Chang said a way to follow up the iPhone with a cheaper version would be to convert the Nano into a phone and price it at $300 or lower. The iPhone sells for $500 and $600, depending on storage space.

“We believe that iPod Nano will be converted into a phone because it’s probably the only way for Apple to launch a lower end phone without severely cannibalizing iPod Nano,” he said noting that the new phone could have “rather limited functionality.”

Because of the anticipated lower price, 2008 sales of 30 million to 40 million units “is achievable,” Chang said.

This would be a much larger volume than is expected of the first iPhone, Apple has targeted sales of 10 million units in 2008, which would give it a 1 percent share of the global market.

Sales of the iPhone are expected to be limited to a small percentage of the market due to its high price tag, particularly in the United States where 85 percent of consumers tend to spend $100 or less on cell phones.

But analysts predict that a cheaper phone from Apple, which leads the digital music player market, could pose a much bigger threat to long-established phone makers such as Nokia, Motorola, Samsung Electronics and Sony Ericsson, owned by Sony and Ericsson.
 
I took Ireland's idea and photoshopped it.
I had to give the SMS button a new color... two greens next to each other just doesnt work :)
Oh, and yeah... I changed AT&T to Sprint. I like Sprint :D
haha.

iphonenano.jpg
Wow, that's excellent. If you could only make it a little bit bigger though, but keep the icons the same size. If you tweaked the size of the nano iPhone just a tad--just to give the "Settings" icon a little breathing space--it'd look perfect to me. You'll probably need to add a slighter of width too, if you were going to make it a little taller--it looks ever-so-slightly too skinny. Still 99% there though--right on.
 
Sales of the iPhone are expected to be limited to a small percentage of the market due to its high price tag, particularly in the United States where 85 percent of consumers tend to spend $100 or less on cell phones.

Ta-daaaaaa.

While I doubt Apple will be taking the mobile phone market by storm anytime soon (I doubt they're going to start churning out cookie-cutter phones like the other companies), they could make an impact with a low-end phone. Start a new craze, like how the iPod exploded with popularity a few years ago and everybody and their grandma had one. That could easily happen with the iPhone Nano. Offer it in different colors, add a Ringtones store to iTunes, offer picture messaging, etc. Everyday consumers will snatch them up without hesitating. Since a lot of iPod owners don't even know that Apple is the company behind it (they think iPod is a brand or a company name), I imagine the tagline to be "From the makers of iPod," like they did with the iMac G5. People will go insane.
 
Sorry if this has already been posted. Check it: link

MSNBC is reporting it as truth. Usually when a big news source posts something, it's for reals, yes?

Just means they have joined the band wagon of crazy rumours since the iPhone was announced and are now posting anything they can find...
 
iPod nano full wide screen multi-touch. iChat, Touch Phone App., Coverflow Videos/Music/Pictures, Camera Phone, No Web, Visual Voice Mail.(*Wide screen typing only*) marketed for younger generation. $249 and $349 models.

Im Probably Way Off.
 
It's totally plausible.

How about:

- 4 GB iPhone nano (no WiFi) $299.99
- 8 GB iPhone $499.99
 
I took Ireland's idea and photoshopped it.
I had to give the SMS button a new color... two greens next to each other just doesnt work :)
Oh, and yeah... I changed AT&T to Sprint. I like Sprint :D
haha.

iphonenano.jpg

No YouTube?!? :confused::D
 
Obviously a cheap attempt to deter iPhone sales and lower AAPL's share price. It'll happen when/if Jobs says it'll happen. Apple is usually at least one step ahead of speculating, overpaid analysts, remember?
 
Anyone thinks

Anyone thinks the iPhone nano might just be 512MB and 1GB just to be cheaper? Also, could be no Maps, widgets etc. But I doubt they would take out internet. look at the Sidekick ID for comparison with SK3.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.