Blame Unicom.
Blame Apple. If they hadn't pushed their unsuccessful profit sharing model, they would have penetrated that marketplace earlier and not have to contend with black market imports from other regions eating away authorized sales.
My father is based out in China. I was speaking to him just now and by chance this topic of the iPhone came up. He was saying that those people who wanted the iPhone got it a long time ago, either from the States or Hong Kong (he got his from Hong Kong last month from a reputable dealer). Furthermore, as many have stated - its not hard to get one from the black market and thats what my dad told me an all.
China Unicom were simply too late in the game.
bingo. It has less to do with wifi and more to do with it's cheaper and already accessible through other avenues.
Also, it is ironic that many are simply attributing poor sales to "crippling of devices" when in fact much of you have previously claimed missing features were of little consequence to the iPhone's success. Why has this position totally evaporated in this discussion?
Apple wont care that much - their figures are based on shipments, not consumer sales so if they've shipped a million or so that's what'll reflect in their revenue.
Also ironic that the same people who contend that missing features have little impact in iPhone adoption are now blaming the carrier for a crippled phone. What happened to all of the ease of use blah blah...
This is Unicom's problem.
Pretty much. This is evidenced before each iPhone update when carriers like o2 and others have a sale on the outgoing models that they're on the hook for.
It will however remove apple's leverage at the negotiation table