i wish it had an AM tuner, so I could listen to sports talk!
yeah! and rush limbaugh!
i wish it had an AM tuner, so I could listen to sports talk!
God if this is true I definitely won't be upgrading. I am very happy with my 3g especially now that I replaced the back case. The new iPhone would have to have something pretty bloody spectacular to make me upgrade. And that's saying something because I usually get the latest tech toys.
Speaking as the happy owner of a 4MP Canon 1D, I'd question your assertion. Now, granted, a 3.2MP camera embedded in a phone with mediocre lens, yeah, I could see 4x6 being a reasonable max, but a tightly packed 12MP in a camera with mediocre lens wouldn't be all that much of an improvement.
12MP + microscopic sensor = noisy at any speed.
I should have clarified. I was basically referring to SLRs as that's where I have more experience. I'd rather have a crappy kit Rebel XSI or similar than some old 3.2mp with a 24-105L (which is a lens that I own and love).
Last autumn my digital prof wouldn't let me print beyond 11x14" on my 10mp 40d. He actually thought that size was pushing the limits of what 10mp could do and preferred I print 8x10". But I'll just have to deal until I can save up for the 5d mk II. Full frame = this is the pixel density you are looking for.
I do wish the iPhone was more like a point and shoot camera in quality. I don't have a camera that I can just throw in my pocket that takes decent shots. My SLR doesn't fit. I'd prefer to not purchase another camera, but I've been considering it, especially since they're so ridiculously cheap nowadays. Although thats just another thing to throw in the pocket...
Only thing i want with my new iPhone is "The front camera".
like a cheap korean and japanese phone that can easily video chat.
Only thing i want with my new iPhone is "The front camera".
like a cheap korean and japanese phone that can easily video chat.
There have been reports of two models of iPhone. This may be the "low end" version for the kids.
I think we are looking at the lower end revision of the two phones to be introduced... just my 2 cents...
I should have clarified. I was basically referring to SLRs as that's where I have more experience. I'd rather have a crappy kit Rebel XSI or similar than some old 3.2mp with a 24-105L (which is a lens that I own and love).
Last autumn my digital prof wouldn't let me print beyond 11x14" on my 10mp 40d. He actually thought that size was pushing the limits of what 10mp could do and preferred I print 8x10". But I'll just have to deal until I can save up for the 5d mk II. Full frame = this is the pixel density you are looking for.
I do wish the iPhone was more like a point and shoot camera in quality. I don't have a camera that I can just throw in my pocket that takes decent shots. My SLR doesn't fit. I'd prefer to not purchase another camera, but I've been considering it, especially since they're so ridiculously cheap nowadays. Although thats just another thing to throw in the pocket...
Quick question
Why is Network another menu?
Version number - does it check out?
Carrier as AT&T3.5 ?
Does the model number of serial end check out?
Does the current phone work on Chinese carriers? Why wasn't this mentioned? Used on US AT&T then why the 3.5 (3.5G?)
Hopefully this is just the "regular" iPhone and there will be a separate iPhone Pro that will be more revolutionary.
Sounds like a lame update. I guess no need to upgrade from the 3G then.
3.2MP for a media centric device...really?...in 2009?
Well there were a whole rumours before that Apple would introduce different iPhone versions now. A more budget focused version, a Pro version, and perhaps a special market one for China since I believe they don't want to allow WiFi on the phone.how so?
You (and your professor) should realise that print resolution/size is dependent on your viewing distance. If you're going to be viewing from a certain distance, you don't need as high resolution.
As for higher resolution on a sensor, this is also dependent on sensor size. On an SLR, you can get away with higher resolution, because absolute pixel size is larger. How big do you think the sensor in a cellphone cam is? There will be an upper limit that is much lower than an SLR -sized sensor, whereby the image quality really goes down due to a low signal to noise ratio.