Originally posted by dongmin
OK I did some research into these 'smart displays'. It's really misleading because they're not 'displays' in the sense that they're an output device for your desktop. Rather, the smart display is a portable computer in itself, more like a PDA with a large display or a wireless internet appliance. The windows-powered smart displays run Windows CE so they're definitely not a desktop replacement.
The OS of the "smart display" is meaningless; the only app running on a Windows "Smart Display" is Remote Desktop. Remote Desktop is essentially the same as Apple's remote software, which allows you to see the desktop of another computer on your computer.
Remote Desktop doesn't transmit raw VGA RGB signals across the wires, or even video card buffers, but instead transmits Window Manager and GDI commands to the remote client. Its "sorta almost kinda like" X-Windows in that respect (although X reverses the client/server topology and allows any number of display devices attached to applications on one computer). Anything that bypasses the Windows GDI can not work with Remote Desktop.
"Smart Displays" (aka Mira) came out of Microsoft at the same time as the Tablet reference design, caused a bit of market confusion, then were essentially dismissed as a very bad idea (primarily because of the limitations; one smart display per desktop, and you can't use the desktop at the same time as the smart display). Also, the fact that most companies wanted to sell the "Smart Display" as a
replacement for the monitor (with the limitations still there when you are sitting down at you desk) made the idea pretty much stink.
And, yes, any DirectX applications (ie, most games and video players) will not work over Remote Desktop and hence will not work with a Smart Display.
Getting back on the thread: a "battery-less" (one would hope that that means just a minimal 1-2 hour battery, not a 10-12 hour variety all-day-use battery) wireless display would seem to fit in the office environment (where the "home base" is returned to often) better than the home environment (where, ideally, such a product would be left on the coffee table or on the bedside table for hours on end and only "cradled" when necessary). But then, as Arn has pointed out, DigiTimes has a low credibility record, so perhaps they're just making that up.