I don't understand why Google is rushing it. I'd rather wait a bit longer and have all the features then get a rushed release that isn't complete. Seems kind of dumb
I don't understand why Google is rushing it. I'd rather wait a bit longer and have all the features then get a rushed release that isn't complete. Seems kind of dumb
I like Chrome because it seems faster than Safari. And seems to use less resources.
I swear Safari is always paging my hard drive. I think the Top Sites feature is responsible.
Chrome does another thing particularly well. It opens up links in the adjacent tab in instances where Safari either opens them up in a tab at the end of the row of tabs or opens them up in a new window.
I also like the tabs at the top design like Safari briefly had before. It saves on space.
I'm getting used to the address bar also being the Google search window. Still I miss the "search history" Safari has.
And Safari's browsing history is much better as well.
And Safari has a neat graphical drag and drop buttons to the toolbar interface. And has an option to email links and even page contents.
Safari is much more ahead in features in other words. Chrome is a bit behind. And this coming from someone that doesn't need alot of features.
defaults write com.apple.Safari TargetedClicksCreateTabs -bool true
I'm about to dump Safari because of the stupid bug that stops it loading pictures from Google Images results pages when the router firewall is on. SO I'm interested in comparing Chrome with Firefox, but FFs ad-blocking will probably tip the balance. Opera won't even load Google Mail, so I'm down to those two contenders.
Sorry, but bookmark support is a pre-alpha feature for a browser and not having it in place for a beta is embarrassing. It's currently a Priority 2 for Version 5 despite long being the bug with the most "stars"/followers in their bug-tracker. The bug entry gives no indication that there's any active development on the issue.
Chrome is the best browser on Windows, but they're going to have to show more interest in the Mac side. Maybe we can hope for proper bookmarks in another year and a half? Or are plugins now more important than basic functionality?
/rant
Bookmarks are so 1990s. Like using a TV Guide with your satellite system.
I'm pretty sure everyone does use some form of electronic guide or Tivo to navigate their channels. You just click on the show you want and it comes on.
What do you do to watch TV? Dial in the satellite heading manually and wait for the dish to swing around?
I don't have a solution for you, but I use Safari on Mac OS X 10.6.2 with my firewall on behind an Airport Extreme using NAT-PMP and I don't have any issues with Google Images. Are you saying that on your router you have a full-fledged firewall running? Which router do you have?
You just proved his point. Tv guide is a magazine with printed tv listings. No one uses it anymore because of electronic guides.
Unless he was arguing that instead of using a "90s" technology like bookmarks, we should all be back in the stoneage?
I guess I'm not sure what his point was, since his analogy was completely backwards. I could only assume he was talking about electronic TV guides (including the ones branded by TV Guide) because last time I checked, bookmarks are electronic lists used for navigation, not a printed magazine.
He was the one suggesting that keeping written notes for interesting URLs and typing them in manually every time was more "modern". (Again, an assumed point, since he didn't actually provide a better suggestion for navigating the web.)
Unless he was arguing that instead of using a "90s" technology like bookmarks, we should all be back in the stoneage?
Firefox is the undisputed champion as long as other browsers doesn't offer adblock.
I think he was suggesting that, like printed TV listings of yore, bookmarks are an outdated technology, replaced by searchbars with autocomplete, bookmark bars, homepages with aggregated links, "top sites" features, etc.
Not that I agree with him, but I see the point. I haven't used a "bookmark" in a very very long time.
In a report posted yesterday, TechCrunch points to a Twitter posting from Mike Pinkerton of the Chrome for Mac team noting that there were only eight bugs remaining to be addressed before the Mac beta of Chrome is ready for its launch....
- Gears (offline support for Web apps; apparently being scrapped entirely in favor of HTML5)....
Chrome has only one feature that I'd like to see in Safari: if you select text, right click, and select 'show in Google' it opens a new tab, as opposed to Safari's overwriting your current page with the search results.
I'm glad to hear that the beta will be finally available. I love app testing, especially browsers so I'll try out Chrome as soon as possible.
Why isn't this configurable, so I can choose whether the right mouse click opens in the current tab or a new one by default?To do this in Safari, I right-click, hold down the control key and select "Search in Google".