think the case is by a swedish company who probably don't have a usa distributor yet.
might be worth contacting them direct - they might have something in the works that will help in the short term.
@Cindori:
This is awesome!
I'm thinking about setting up an HTHackintosh as soon as I'm done upgrading my Mac Pro.Whenever this will be...
Does About This Mac make your processor recognized? The info window is saying 'unknown' in the above picture...
Cindori delivers!
![]()
![]()
![]()
You should be that fair to post the 64bit Mac Pro benches, not the 32bit results.
Geekbench Mac Pro Dual Quad 2.26GHz 64bit: 13286.
Finding or building a system that's both more powerful and less expensive than the MP is intelligent. Common sense means you see the cost savings.There is something wrong with having intelligence, common sense and morality?
It may, but it's more likely that the microcode will be needed. There's slight voltage differences here, as there's a die shrink involved.There is no reason why Gainestown shouldn't work on the stock "Nehalem" Mac Pro. Apple didn't do anything to block quad-core Xeons from working on the very first generation Mac Pro; and I don't see any reason why they would block the six-core chips from working on the current. (That was a similar upgrade; drop-in compatible with a BIOS update, which wasn't needed on the Mac Pro.)