Loud motor noises? I'm not sure I would trust an electric motor for a personal aircraft, so it makes sense to use a fossil fuel motor for the iCraft.![]()
I still crack up every time I see the "loud motor noises" rumor pop up.
Say Apple is developing a car, which would be tesla-like in idea, meaning electric, why would anyone hear motor noises from any development area? "Hey guys, let's develop a car to rival tesla, but let's test petrol engines beforehand so we know what an engine is."
Unless they are developing a petrol engined car, which will use fuel that's twice as efficient and twice as refined for "unapologetic performance".
Batteries? They're going to have to get them from Tesla who soon will control the world market on lithium ion batteries.I can't wait to see this car...gonna be the thinnest car you've ever seen. Too bad the battery won't last very long.
Hopefully many country will soon follow Neatherland and ban the sell of gasoline and gasoil cars. And maybe shortly after ban them from the road altogether#gonnastickwithmy5.0literV8
I wonder what the price will be. $50,000? ...
#stickwithmyhorseandcarriage#gonnastickwithmy5.0literV8
Interesting point re. engine sounds but petrol isn't as efficient as electricity at point of use electricity is much more efficient and greener, the big variable however is how it was generated in the first place.Say Apple is developing a car, which would be tesla-like in idea, meaning electric, why would anyone hear motor noises from any development area? "Hey guys, let's develop a car to rival tesla, but let's test petrol engines beforehand so we know what an engine is."
Unless they are developing a petrol engined car, which will use fuel that's twice as efficient and twice as refined for "unapologetic performance".
Hopefully many country will soon follow Neatherland and ban the sell of gasoline and gasoil cars. And maybe shortly after ban them from the road altogether
[doublepost=1460440920][/doublepost]That would be way more innovative and interesting.
If it's priced like other Apple products...
Then the base price for the model that can go 160 miles without a charge will be $49,999.
For every 160 mile range expansion that costs Apple $1,000 to add, they will change an extra $10,000.
And a lucrative third part market will arise, selling windshield protectors that will require incredible skill to install without seeing air or dust bubbles.
/jk
Hopefully ... (But with better control of firmware for the engine)The Apple Car is being developed mostly in Germany...
I would be very surprised if Apple would undercut Teslas prices, leave alone significantly.Not sure about you but I can't afford to spend the cost of a college tuition on a car.
Depends on one's personal view, I guess. For me, someone who forces an employee to decide between company and family, is far from being cool.I think Elon Musk is the coolest.
In sheer manufacturing numbers, it's Apple that is light years ahead of Tesla. And both are far behind any reputated car maker out there, when it comes to car manufacturing.with 325K orders and counting on their model 3, [Tesla] will be lghtyears ahead of Apple in mfg skill.
Tesla still has to prove that they can eventually deliver upon their promises. So far their track record for mass products and production is nothing to write home about.The only thing that makes sense to me is that Apple buys Tesla outright.
I see no reason why Apple could not leverage it's existing business contacts with chinese companies to produce a potential car. Even the big players in the automobile world get a significant part of their car parts as complete component assembly already. Apple has proven to be able to assure a consistent level of good quality from chinese fabs, so the hardest part of actually producing that potential car is to put the function blocks together, akin to Lego. (Okay, in reality it's a bit more complex, but really lots of R&D and pre-assembly is already done by subcontractors these days. Until recently, the big players prouded themselves of engine and suspension being their "core competencies" - and purchased most of the rest).The only other thing that makes sense is that Apple will partner with either Diamler Benz or BMW or a Japanese company to compete with Tesla.
Apple is not depending on LiIon batteries. There are enough other approaches for a decently "green" car engine, ranging from different battery technologies to hydrogen motors.Batteries? They're going to have to get them from Tesla who soon will control the world market on lithium ion batteries.
Would definitely love a Siri controlled car,
"Siri, I'm freezing my ass off here!"
"OK, I turned on the seat warmers"
Say Apple is developing a car, which would be tesla-like in idea, meaning electric, why would anyone hear motor noises from any development area? "Hey guys, let's develop a car to rival tesla, but let's test petrol engines beforehand so we know what an engine is."
Unless they are developing a petrol engined car, which will use fuel that's twice as efficient and twice as refined for "unapologetic performance".
Hopefully ... (But with better control of firmware for the engine)
[doublepost=1460454483][/doublepost]More areas where people will constantly fly with their drones ...
I love Tesla as a company. I think Elon Musk is the coolest. But I just can't get into the visual design of Tesla cars. There's just something weak about the aesthetics when you compare them other high end cars.
Not sure about you but I can't afford to spend the cost of a college tuition on a car.