Where are the actual counterarguments? Or there just isn't any?
This is the third person who refuses to address any of my points except to resort to ad hominem.
Quote my arguments and provide your counterargument. Let's debate.
You didn't make arguments, you stated incorrect factoids and it takes more effort to respond properly than you have with your assertions.
Further, I don't benefit at all by educating you or anyone else. In fact it is probably detrimental to me, which, according to your asinine logic I should be clamoring to legitimize and "argue" with you as that creates another greater fool in this ponzi.
Rather, I hope the public stays out of it for as long as possible so I can keep accumulating. I have not pushed it in the slightest and didn't purchase any, yet look at what it's done.
Perhaps your lesson is that ALL currency is a scam. It's based on nothing but promises and authority. Maybe that's why crypto scares you? But explain why if this is the case, so many major financial institutions are acquiring it? If they're also "scammers" what does that say about any given financial instrument?
But I will pick one easy point to refute, since I'm lazy and bored of people who somehow think their own education is the teacher's responsibility...
For example, your nonsense about picking two out of three: centralization, performance, security is so mindnumbingly incorrect because those three qualities are not mutually exclusive and those are variables for many facets of the technology/system.
You could argue that visa is secure or not secure based on the vector, or that it has amazing performance or awful performance based on the product. and centralization is relative to the ecosystem.
crypto has already been proven to have more transactions per second FINALIZED than any creditor system (vica accepting a transaction is not fulfilled for days), it's key feature is to be censorship resistant if you stay off of mainstream channels, and security is a baseline as there is no harder currency in existance.
ps:
The proper trinity is always cost/quality/quantity in any example because those are three mutually exclusive variables.
for products: fast and cheap is not high quality, high quality and cheap is not fast, fast and high quality is not cheap.
or with a job: well paying and fun is probably not legal, legal and well paying not fun, fun and legal is not well paying. etc.
