TDM21 said:
I am more into gaming dispite I have a 12" PB. The specs on the computer is a little vague. It says "High Performance Video".
Very true, I would probably bet that it has intergraded video.
This would defiantly NOT be a computer I would be buying for anything other than looks, or word processing.
I did a quick check on newegg, and for $1,700 I built a computer with two 80GB SATA HDs in a RAID 0, Pentium M @ 1.8GHz, two 512 Mushkin RAM chips in dual channel-cas @ 2.5 (total 1 gig), 8x DVD-R, ATI AIW 9600XT 128MB. Of course this excludes things like tech support, which also make the cost much higher. So it's not really fair, but I don't care.
TDM21 said:
It also has a Intel M processor. Who got the idea to put a Mobile processor into a desktop? In my opinion that is not a very great option
There are several reasons why they would put a mobile processor in it. A mobile processor can use over half as less power as it's desktop counterpart. A Pentium IV EE 3.4GHz processor uses over 100 watts (on full load), while a mobile processor might only use 40 or 50. The less power the better.
Also, this computer seems more like a laptop to me rather then a desktop, so it's important to keep the temperatures down, mobile processors generate less heat since they run at a lower vCore.
The last reason (that I can think of) is for overcloking. Mobile processors tend to have the FSB and multipliers unlocked because that allows the laptop computers to change the speed of the processor, consuming less battery power. Desktops, on the other hand, always have the multipliers locked (but the front side bus is still changeable). But the mother board in the computer probably has both the FSB and multipliers locked.
But the downside can be that the mobile processors are more expensive, and do not come with a heatsink or fan. The reason they are more expensive is because the processor is made out of the center of the silicon wafer, the desktop processors are made from the edges.