Sweet! I was hoping for a thinner MacBookPro!!!
…said no one ever...
Ahh, the old form over function trick. Who wouldn't prioritise thinness over performance and I/O in a Pro device? Oh, wait...
What's bloody wrong with people whining about the presumed performance of a mockup?
I admit I hadn't thought about this possibility for the MacBook line. Shrink the size of the MacBook Pro and have a MacBook line based on the Intel Core M-series chip and a MacBook Pro line based on the Intel Core i-series chip.
They look very similar in size to Dell's XPS line.
I thought that was gold. It nicely sums up where I feel like the key divide should be between the mobile space and the desktop space. This is the implementation I could get behind. Windows sure went for it, but I think they totally missed.His post on OSX, or MacOS as he thinks it should go is more interesting - with some pretty good concepts.
Actually more like two, when you consider what the original iMac was designed to replace.Making things thinner has been apple one-trick pony with design for like a decade now.
Hey thanks!I thought that was gold. It nicely sums up where I feel like the key divide should be between the mobile space and the desktop space. This is the implementation I could get behind. Windows sure went for it, but I think they totally missed.
[doublepost=1459378172][/doublepost]
Actually more like two, when you consider what the original iMac was designed to replace.
Not a fan, specially the rose gold. Don't get me wrong I rock the color, but never on my notebook.
No MagSafe = no buy.
Okay, wait: can we get a separate article about how cool that friggin' macOS concept is?! Amazing, and makes perfect sense. Can we, as a community, make an uproar for Apple to use this idea by hiring the guy?
That is all. Thanks for listening.
Sweet! I was hoping for a thinner MacBookPro!!!
…said no one ever...