Sidebar Sidebar
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Consider restricting a new member’s ability to post a thread

I think we’ve adjusted well to this new form of spam.

- heads up via this thread is appreciated. Mods can deal with deleting spam but I can do more to block it
- capping new threads from new users seems reasonable
- let me know if u see a burst of new spam
 
  • Like
Reactions: annk, Apple_Robert, I7guy and 2 others
arn said:
I think we’ve adjusted well to this new form of spam.

- heads up via this thread is appreciated. Mods can deal with deleting spam but I can do more to block it
- capping new threads from new users seems reasonable
- let me know if u see a burst of new spam
Click to expand...
Thank you very much for taking the request seriously and for allowing different opinions to be heard, not to mention doing what you can to stifle the spam even more.
 
  • Like
Reactions: I7guy
BasicGreatGuy said:
If that is the case, that is a shame because the spammers are able to get away with a lot of needless spamming across the forums.
Click to expand...
They are fulfilling their needs for revenue generation. You could try to fulfill your needs not to see such things by zealously reporting the Threads in question.
 
BasicGreatGuy said:
I was the one that reported all the spam on the day in question. I always report.
Click to expand...
Yeah, if it's the weird advertising spam, I'll check the user to see if they have multiple threads, which they usually do, so I'll report the number they've started rather than each thread.
 
Looks like a some forum sections are getting hit today, with a number of different new users spamming a few sections with more and more new threads. A few are up to about 15 new threads in a period of only about an hour -- hard to imagine a valid use case to make anywhere close to that many new threads in that short of a timespan, let alone when it's right after joining as a brand new user.
 
C DM said:
Looks like a some forum sections are getting hit today, with a number of different new users spamming a few sections with more and more new threads. A few are up to about 15 new threads in a period of only about an hour -- hard to imagine a valid use case to make anywhere close to that many new threads in that short of a timespan, let alone when it's right after joining as a brand new user.
Click to expand...

Trouble is, it becomes an arms race. Limit the posts a newbie can make, and the scammers create more accounts that then make reporting harder.

Creating accounts is easy as well, so that’s hardly a high barrier.
 
TiggrToo said:
Trouble is, it becomes an arms race. Limit the posts a newbie can make, and the scammers create more accounts that then make reporting harder.

Creating accounts is easy as well, so that’s hardly a high barrier.
Click to expand...
I would ask under what circumstances would there ever be a need for a new person to register and start 15 new threads in a day? This board is huge, people will find these loopholes and exploit them.
 
ericgtr12 said:
I would ask under what circumstances would there ever be a need for a new person to register and start 15 new threads in a day? This board is huge, people will find these loopholes and exploit them.
Click to expand...

None that I can imagine, but as I said it's an arms race to the bottom.
 
The tech support spammers are continuing to plague the forum. What you have tried thus far isn’t working. Please consider restricting new members from posting one the forum, until said post have been vetted by a mod. It would prevent the forum from being covered in the same spam messages over and over. Thus far today, I have reported at least 13 different spammers posting the same spam.
 
Last edited:
Apple_Robert said:
The tech support spammers are continuing to plague the forum
Click to expand...
Agreed, its been bad these past couple of days.

Apple_Robert said:
Please consider restricting new members from posting one the forum, until said post have been vetted by a mod.
Click to expand...
That's not really feasible, what exactly would we do to vet a new member? They have no posts that we could rely on, no track record no data in essence. Plus the fact that there's usually only two maybe three moderators on the board at anyone time, the amount of volume of new members would be overwhelming.

While I agree what we have in place is currently not working approving members before they could post isn't feasible imo.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Scepticalscribe
maflynn said:
Agreed, its been bad these past couple of days.


That's not really feasible, what exactly would we do to vet a new member? They have no posts that we could rely on, no track record no data in essence. Plus the fact that there's usually only two maybe three moderators on the board at anyone time, the amount of volume of new members would be overwhelming.

While I agree what we have in place is currently not working approving members before they could post isn't feasible imo.
Click to expand...
What I am talking about is simple. A new member creates a post and it immediately gets sent to the mods for review, thus saving the forum from being plagued with spam. Once the new member has x amount of successful posts, said member’s post no longer enter mod review. This simple solution also cuts down on mods having to review spam alert reports.

The fix is easy to implement.
 
Apple_Robert said:
What I am talking about is simple. A new member creates a post and it immediately gets sent to the mods for review, thus saving the forum from being plagued with spam. Once the new member has x amount of successful posts, said member’s post no longer enter mod review. This simple solution also cuts down on mods having to review spam alert reports.

The fix is easy to implement.
Click to expand...
It’s a frustrating experience for legit new users. We do do this for anyone posting links already.

agree some spam has slipped through the last couple of days but you don’t see how much spam does get filtered out already.

arn
 
They could just limit the number of posts by a new member to one per hour and the problem would be reduced significantly and moderators would have time to review the account for rules compliance.
 
Madhatter32 said:
They could just limit the number of posts by a new member to one per hour and the problem would be reduced significantly and moderators would have time to review the account for rules compliance.
Click to expand...
This is already in place. New users are limited to 2 per hour.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Madhatter32
For reference in the past hour or so, about 40 posts and accounts have been filtered and deleted without being posted publicly.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Runs For Fun and I7guy
This thread looks weird. There are people* posting with one ID, then being quoted as another.

I assume they changed their name. Surprised that's allowed, but if it is then the db update should change all the quoted posts too.

* Just one person, but it sounds more dramatic the way I said it :)
 
adrianlondon said:
This thread looks weird. There are people* posting with one ID, then being quoted as another.

I assume they changed their name. Surprised that's allowed, but if it is then the db update should change all the quoted posts too.

* Just one person, but it sounds more dramatic the way I said it :)
Click to expand...

Yeah you’re right. @Apple_Robert changed their username in the middle of this thread but the quotes don’t get updated. I’ll look into it.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: adrianlondon
arn said:
It’s a frustrating experience for legit new users
Click to expand...
That's also why I'm not for that move, I've been to forums that my posts were waiting for approval - taking a day if not longer to which they finally got approved. I largely didn't stay there as it wasn't a very user friendly.

I get that its frustrating, and believe me, it was frustrating for me, as I was trying to keep it from getting terribly out of hand.

edit: clarification
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Scepticalscribe, annk and arn
Apple_Robert said:
Past quotes won’t get automatically updated to the new name. You would have to manually edit each applicable post.

I did put my former name in my signature (@adrianlondon) to clear up any confusion if people bother to read such.
Click to expand...
Ah, I have signatures disabled so don't see them. However, it was clear from the quoted ID what your old and new IDs are. It's not that important, but there was grief on another forum I'm a member of when some people changed their IDs (as they'd registered with their real full names like a newbie) but all the quotes carried their old one. Some SQL was run to sort it out :)

Back on topic: I occasionally see spam here, but it's such obvious spam and stays for such a short amount of time, I assume no-one actually falls for it. Hence there's no need to change anything. IMO of course.
 
Apple_Robert said:
What I am talking about is simple. A new member creates a post and it immediately gets sent to the mods for review, thus saving the forum from being plagued with spam. Once the new member has x amount of successful posts, said member’s post no longer enter mod review. This simple solution also cuts down on mods having to review spam alert reports.

The fix is easy to implement.
Click to expand...

Madhatter32 said:
They could just limit the number of posts by a new member to one per hour and the problem would be reduced significantly and moderators would have time to review the account for rules compliance.
Click to expand...

Twice a year, - if memory serves - post statistics are published on the forum.

One of the stats that has remained in my mind is that the vast majority of those who join the forum make only one post, and a further astonishing percentage of members make between one and five posts.

Many people - I was one - who join the forum, join simply because they have a question they wish to ask about an Apple product they have bought. That's it. Once the question has been answered - usually by someone who has been around a lot longer, unless the new poster chooses to linger, they have no pressing reason to remain.

I, for one, would not favour anything which serves as a further barrier to new members joining the forum and asking the questions they may wish to ask, which is why any of them joined the forum in the first place.

Having to wait for a mod to vet your account when you join, and vet whether your query is genuine strikes me as a degree of overkill, and would come across - as a first experience of the site - as unwelcoming, unfriendly and excessively controlling.

Apple_Robert said:
Past quotes won’t get automatically updated to the new name. You would have to manually edit each applicable post.

I did put my former name in my signature (@adrianlondon) to clear up any confusion if people bother to read such.
Click to expand...
Reading this thread this evening, I realised that I hadn't a clue who the OP was.

Okay: Thanks for clearing that up.
maflynn said:
That's also why I'm not for that move, I've been to forums that my posts were waiting for approval - taking a day if not longer to which they finally got approved. I largely didn't stay there as it wasn't a very user friendly.

I get that its frustrating, and believe me, it was frustrating for me, as I was trying to keep it from getting terribly out of hand.

edit: clarification
Click to expand...
Agreed.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.
Top Bottom
Back