What's Consumer Reports?
CR needs to show that it is "working hard" and always looking out for consumers' interests. I have no complaints with the new iPad. Heat? Barely noticeable. The new iPad is simply awesome!
A reviewing company that I think is horrible in terms of digital device reviews. They are super-biased against Apple. I'm not referring to this case, though, just the antenna thing and their opposition to Macs for no good reason. Calling CR wrong right now for this case would be fanboyism.
Best comment I've seen on this "issue" on the interwebs:
http://www.loopinsight.com/2012/03/20/consumer-reports-from-bagels-to-ipads/
In summary: "I call ******** on Consumer Reports."
I'm pretty sure this one is more realistic than the antenna issues. The antenna issues were total BS, and I lost all of my respect for CR at that point, but I think they're actually right here as long as they don't overinflate the story like before.
...if there are any actual owners in here, have you used your iPad 3 while plugged into a WALL SOCKET and found that it did not charge during use?
No, I don't think there is enough information yet to be able to say that this is any less fantasy than the antenna gate problem. You see, my partner and I have been using our iPads almost nonstop since Friday and we are nothing but amazed and enthralled with this amazing product. I have conducted FaceTime chats for long periods of time while charging in the cradle. No charging issues whatsoever. Watched plenty of YouTube videos and played some FPS games - have noticed the unit gets very slightly warm but nothing to even give a second thought.
They are anything but a "media company".I went to the CR article about not recommending the iPhone and said that I don't recommend Consumer Reports. Really, someone who doesn't release reports as his job would be more honest than a media company that just wants attention.
http://www.consumerreports.org/cro/aboutus/adviolation/why-it-matters/index.htmNo Advertising, No Freebies No Bias As a nonprofit organization, we are not beholden to any commercial interest. We accept no free samples, and we pay for all the products and services we test.
We also accept no advertising. Our income is derived from the sale of Consumer Reports®, ConsumerReports.org®, and our other publications and information products, services, fees, and noncommercial contributions and grants.
But have you tried doing something really intensive like Infinite Blade II while charging? I mean, at what point in terms of processor usage can it not charge? I don't care about the heat problem as much as this.
Also, you can't use your personal experience and your friend's to call BS on Consumer Reports. I called BS only when I had heard enough people say that there was no antenna issue (after trying it myself a few times). What if about 1/4th of the units are defective, and you and your friend just got mildly lucky?
I'm going to go try it out ASAP, half because I want to see how much of a problem it is, half because it looks AMAZING. That retina display must be beautiful!
They are anything but a "media company".
But you would know that if you spent more than 30 seconds researching them.
I would trust their assessment over a paid labs testing any day of the week.
http://www.consumerreports.org/cro/aboutus/adviolation/why-it-matters/index.htm
While this is a little bit of a bummer, I'd probably be willing to tow a nuclear reactor behind me if that was what was needed to power this retina display. I just love this display.
Also, I'd like to know what brightness setting they ran it at. This is key, and it surprises me that CR would leave out this important bit of info. According to DisplayMate:
"... the display normally consumes about 50-60 percent of the total Tablet power"
"...the running time at Maximum brightness in our tests was 5.8 hours, 20 percent less than the iPad 2's 7.2 hours. But at the Middle brightness slider setting, which is closer to typical user settings, the running time was 11.6 hours..."
It's likely that CR cranked the brightness to max and then ran the most intensive game they could to evaluate worst-case conditions. That's fine, but they should have stated it outright.
They may just find that an intensive game at 50% brightness still allows for charging, or at least maintaining battery levels.
See here: http://gizmodo.com/5894445/the-best-tablet-display-guess-who
Consumer Reports, IMO, is a total piece of crap. Companies have their hands deep within Consumer Reports' pockets, if you'd like a biased review look no further than CR. Just go out of business already or give credit where credit is due, the New iPad is amazing...The display just makes my knee's weak and all they can focus on is "it gets hot"
Last thing - When your at the top, like Apple is, everyone wants to take you down.
How do you feel about their Mac reviews where they rate them at the top of each category? Is that biased too? Is that trying to "take Apple down"?
CR report: it felt very warm but not especially uncomfortable.
CR on CNBC: hot enough to be uncomfortable at least.
Ok, CR, which is it?
----------
I personally wouldn't use a CR report as a basis for any purchase.
How do you feel about their Mac reviews where they rate them at the top of each category? Is that biased too? Is that trying to "take Apple down"?
I think this sentence is worded to mean something other than that which was intended.