Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Status
Not open for further replies.
I bought three 6's (one for myself, my wife, and my mother) and two out of the three are bent. The two that are bent were kept in our pockets. The only one that is still flat was kept in a purse. We didn't even know they were bent because all three of us have cases on them and didn't realize it until I took them out of the cases to show someone what they looked like with no case.
 
To me that CR video is alarming. I mean, the iPhone 5 doesn't deform until 130, and the 6 Plus at just 90, with the regular 6 at a paltry 70 pounds! That's just shy of half the force of an iPhone 5 to bend it.

Half the force.... but still a force that you are not going to apply to any phone!
Unless you don't intentionally want to bend it....

HTC one is even less resistant, but nobody is whining about it on the web
 
One thing i've noticed is all the tests i've seen try to bend them with the screen on the outside.

Whenever I put my phone in my pocket, I purposefully do so with the screen facing my leg.

Then if I was to walk into anything like a table, the screen won't take a hit and potentially shatter.
Presumably the phone should be less likely to bend with the screen towards your leg too?

Yeah, I've been through exactly this point before. You put your phone in your pocket just like 99.9% of all the rest of us, and you are absolutely right that the phone wouldn't in the direction shown when you put it in your front pocket just as you and the vast majority of the rest of us do.
 
This broken phone still WORKS

Consumer Reports did a great job but two comments might get overlooked from the great picture

1) the screen did NOT break
2) the phone still WORKED after being broken that badly

The hysterical press should take a Chill Pill
 
Drop it doelcm82 and everyone grow up and stop attacking people. This is getting stupid fast. Focus on the problem: the iPhone 6 Plus deforms at just 90 pounds of force, 40 pounds less than the iPhone 5 and 60 pounds less than the Note 3. That's what you should be focusing on: the shxt sandwich all of us are eating right now regarding its durability.

And the kicker is this: the pattern of the bends in the wild seems to follow somewhat along the lines that the bend is happening at a weak point: under the bottom volume button. The CR video did not put the pressure primarily there. So, if they did, the pounds of pressure may have been substantially less to deform it, which is even more alarming to think about.

----------



No these people are not joking xmichaelp. That's what this place has degraded into. It's insane.

----------



Exactly, which is what I've been saying. But even still, the amount of force to deform an iPhone 6 is almost just half of what it takes to deform an iPhone 5! This is alarming.
Omg it is not JUST 90 pounds!!!
It is a lot of force applied on it, those 90 pounds!
Do you know something about physics?!?
 
How is your pocket going to know where to direct the force?

Even though I do have a very smart pocket, it's probably not aware of weak spots in iPhone. I'll concede to that;) However, under prolonged use, if you have the phone in your pocket in lots of different situations, there can surely be occasions when the phone gets pressure to very specific points.

I don't have any stakes in this btw - I've been owning nothing but Apple products since the early 2000s (just tried out a Samsung for a couple of months, not going back). And I considered upgrading the to 6 plus from my 4S when it was released a couple of weeks ago. However, I have been having the feeling for the last couple of years that Apple is no longer making products that "just work", like Steve said. That has always been the reason I've stuck with Apple. And I really think Apple fanboys are doing a huge disservice to Apple by not demanding the best from them, and make up excuses in stead.
 
It is "just" 90 lbs. That's because it's in the context of being compared to other phones that take much more force to deform.

Why would those manufacturers like Samsung not just make a phone that would deform at 90 lbs.? Because they know things we don't: how to produce consumer electronics including testing the strength of smartphones.

Why did Apple make a phone that needs 130 pounds of force to bend and not 70 like the iPhone 6?

There's no easy answers here but reality is reality. And we cannot and will not discount this problem because people like you just want it to go away.
You don't know about Samsung. They tested just a single model over how many? 1000?
 
I bought three 6's (one for myself, my wife, and my mother) and two out of the three are bent. The two that are bent were kept in our pockets. The only one that is still flat was kept in a purse. We didn't even know they were bent because all three of us have cases on them and didn't realize it until I took them out of the cases to show someone what they looked like with no case.

Let's see pictures, or video...


I have an iPhone 6 that I got on release day, and I have carried it in my pocket every day, including in my back jeans pocket for two of those days. I've sat on it for a minimum of three hours, total in the last week. In the very flimsy leather case. No bending.
 
This is a response to most who don't understand or have direct experience of force of pressure in the amounts that have been specified.

Perhaps it would assist in the understanding what amounts of pressure are applied to a device before it breaches in the conditions as claimed. This would inturn assist forum members contribution To this subject.

The other thing that would assist in an informed contribution is having direct experience with the device. However the reference to an engineer is simply because they have a former grasp of subject such as this and what is generated on average through daily usage. Do you know?

A lot of people don’t have direct experience of death or a broken bone but they’d probably like to avoid both. It’s nice to have experience but it isn’t always essential. In addition my/your experience will be different from those of others.

Personally I’ve done enough physics and electronics without being an engineer to know that most things we do are approximations that point toward a probable outcome.
What someone should do, and consumer reports are one of the only nationwide independent, (though not necessarily unbiased), organisations with the resource to do so, is put pressure guages on the phone to measure what forces act where as I’m pretty sure that the phone in this guys pocket wasn’t subjected to pressure in the middle like they showed.
Lictor I think, correctly pointed out that the leg area will exert significantly more pressure than the arm/hand. It is also significantly less sensitive to the amount of pressure exerted than an arm so it’d be much easier to bend an item with your lower body strength whilst not thinking that much force has been applied.

So. A definitive.
Was the phone in a front or rear pocket?
Was the glass facing in or out?
Was the whole phone in the pocket or did some of it protrude like that bloody camera?


Only once we understand and agree on the above can we make a fair test whether you are a Fanbois or Fandroid.

Since the story first broke I’ve learned that a lot more people carry phones in their back pockets than I thought, (the vast majority are women), and they seem to not care whether the front or the back faces out. Also a lot of people apparently never sit down with their phone in pocket, (that, I don’t believe though).
 
...noted when the phones first started to deform (that's what our engineers call it)

Hello?

That is what EVERYONE calls it. That is not some isoteric latin term applied to describe scientific processes. Now if they had nattered on about "elastic deformation" and "plastic deformation", maybe it would be appropriate to explain further.

Where does CR find their journalists?

Although to be fair, at least the "engineering" staff at CR did a better job with this investigation than in many of their previous "investigations". Maybe they are trying to get back into Apple's good graces after doing that hack job on the iPhone 4 and 5.
 
Really

What is interesting here is that the Note 3 stands up better that all no one is talking about that here all phones are bendable at some point mass produced anything is possible. I still have to wait till nov for my 6plus not cool.
 
Maybe premium should mean that something is made of durable and recyclable materials instead of sh i tty plastics that mess up our food and water chains.

Without wanting to be the crybaby over here. People should start caring a little more again. And then I mean taking care of instead of threating things as if they were made to be broken.
If there is a real problem Apple should fix it.

Like the Apple 5c? Unapologetically plastic?
 
The bendie mentality will have a hard time understanding that something could be engineered strong enough for its intended purpose...that after a certain point making it stronger serves no purpose.

One could design a dinner fork that could lift 50 lbs without bending. So what?

+1

That fork analogy is the best way to summarize how dumb this whole issue is (and how dumb the media-starved sensationalists are).
 
Ya, been thinking about this as the M8 is (like the M7) quite bombproof.

They used a point load which because of the curved back placed a massive load on the shell hence the case Deformed. In real life, that just doesn't happen. It's interesting to see that at the end, despite the pinch load, the case deformed evenly and it still worked. The M8 (bizarrely) would look to me to be quite good in real life. The rest should have had a better load applicator.

Generally, the results are a bit unscientific. I keep saying that its not the point that the iPhone breaks when pushed because that's to be expected. The point I'd that under certain conditions it deforms relatively easily.

The test should have been a stepped load/ response test, measuring the response at load intervals giving a stress-strain graph for it to be of proper use. As it is, its no better than hat boy and his thumbs.

Bombproof? You might want to look at the video again. You know, the video done with calibrated machines, by an organization that does this for a living.
 
First, pay close attention to the iPhone portion of the video. After making a great show of it being brand new and untouched just before he starts bending it he drops it down below camera range. Now when he does start bending it note the position of his elbows and wrists. Elbows are bent, wrists straight and then bent as he pushes with his thumb.

Then go forward to the Moto X section. He locks his elbows straight out and his wrists are already bent and his thumbs fully stretched out across the back of the Moto X. He barely applied any pressure at all.

This is a classic technique used to fool people by everybody from magicians to carnival sideshows to street performers, Uri Geller types, you name it. He keeps your attention on his hands and the phone so you don't notice he's doing two entirely different moves. And if you think that iPhone was the same one he showed you in the beginning of the video I can assure you you're mistaken.

And then there is the matter of the "witnesses". Truly some bad acting going on there. This looked a lot like a poor imitation of a Chris Angel trick. And in the end there is no data so there is no test. This joker wants lots of attention and has figured out a way to get it without actually proving anything.

Truly unbelievable how far people would go. My first thought was why would he not just try bending a Samsung note 3 rather than the Motorola but I now saw your post.
 
Like the Apple 5c? Unapologetically plastic?

These days the word premium is governed in the main by two things. Brand and cost. There are other criteria but those two are the ones the average consumer thinks of most.
With regard to the 5C I don’t think plastic was an issue. I’d actually say that Apple must have spent significant time assessing tactility. It has far and away the nicest feel of anything plastic I can remember handling.
 
Last edited:
http://www.cultofmac.com/297938/weakspot-theory-shows-bendgates-quite-dead-yet/

What a great article. That makes sense to me. I think long time iPhone owners (3/4 series) never thought twice about putting their phone in their front pocket. Starting with the 5 series we began hearing about bent iPhones and had to start being more careful with them, and now this. Even Consumer Reports says the 6 series is not as robust as the 5 series.

No matter what you believe, make no mistake this issue will hurt Apple's bottom line. I'm convinced they will sell fewer phones because of it.

I think it's clear at this point that the 6 series is weaker than the 5 series, which in turn is weaker than the 4 series. So over the 5 years, durability seems to be headed in the wrong direction - and while size is a factor, engineering and choice of materials also play a role.

While I don't plan to put my iPhone 6 in a situation where it might bend under stress (I love this thing), I truly do sympathize with people who acquired a very expensive piece of hardware and treated it like past models, only to discover that their new iPhone is more like some kind of delicate flower and is now beginning to resemble a banana.

Having said that, I would be shocked if Apple engineering isn't conducting their own further testing right now with an eye to making some changes to that weak pivot spot if it turns out to be the issue. And if it is, someone at Apple will ask "How the heck did we miss that?"
 
omg. it amazes me how people in the third world kill/stab people to get their hands on an iphone. and in western countries people are breaking them for just to see what happens! if only they knew how valuable that commodity is in other parts of the world. :D

It amazes me how SAVAGE some people can be in 3rd world countries over a PHONE
 
Let's see pictures, or video...


I have an iPhone 6 that I got on release day, and I have carried it in my pocket every day, including in my back jeans pocket for two of those days. I've sat on it for a minimum of three hours, total in the last week. In the very flimsy leather case. No bending.

All I can say is lucky for you. My mother's phone is way worse than mine, and I didn't take photos while I was at her house yesterday. Mine is only very slight and I can live with it, I'm just going to be super vigilant from now on to not put any pressure on it. Hers on the other hand, is very noticeably bent with the glass slightly pulling away from the frame, and we have an appointment at the Genius Bar on Tuesday (earliest available). I'll get some photos before we turn in the bent phone.

Trust me when I say I was a non-believer as well, until I saw it with my own eyes. And it was a shock because, like I said, we all have cases on them and while in the case they looked fine. It wasn't until I pulled them out of the cases that the, "OH, *****" moment happened.
 
http://www.cultofmac.com/297938/weakspot-theory-shows-bendgates-quite-dead-yet/

What a great article. That makes sense to me. I think long time iPhone owners (3/4 series) never thought twice about putting their phone in their front pocket. Starting with the 5 series we began hearing about bent iPhones and had to start being more careful with them, and now this. Even Consumer Reports says the 6 series is not as robust as the 5 series.

No matter what you believe, make no mistake this issue will hurt Apple's bottom line. I'm convinced they will sell fewer phones because of it.

I think it's clear at this point that the 6 series is weaker than the 5 series, which in turn is weaker than the 4 series. So over the 5 years, durability seems to be headed in the wrong direction - and while size is a factor, engineering and choice of materials also play a role.

While I don't plan to put my iPhone 6 in a situation where it might bend under stress (I love this thing), I truly do sympathize with people who acquired a very expensive piece of hardware and treated it like past models, only to discover that their new iPhone is more like some kind of delicate flower and is now beginning to resemble a banana.

Having said that, I would be shocked if Apple engineering isn't conducting their own further testing right now with an eye to making some changes to that weak pivot spot if it turns out to be the issue. And if it is, someone at Apple will ask "How the heck did we miss that?"

I’m not sure. As I said earlier as much as I do think they cheaped out on it, the percieved lack of strength is not what would keep me from buying it. I reckon there plenty that think the same.
 
Yes, a significantly lower amount of force (maybe 25 lbs max) that is applied equally across the entire top/bottom of the device. It's not going to bend. You could simulate that on a table top just by placing a weight on top of the phone.

I honestly don't know (and don't want to test it on my iPhone) but am more than happy to assume you are correct.

I appreciate your thoughts and the civil discussion we had.

I may have more at stake financially than many here due to my trading in AAPL stock and options so I scrutinize these issues very closely. Even if they lack merit, it has a significant impact on the stock over the short term.

I will say this issue provided a profitable week for trading Apple. And if you ever want to learn some ways to make money on Apple to buy all those great Apple products, I provide some options education (free part of my site) and a lot of Apple stock info / stats.

http://aapltrader99.home.comcast.net/~aapltrader99/Apple_Trading/Welcome.html
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.