Every software has vulnerabilities, that's not the point. Your own links show android has more critical vulnerabilities in the period posted. The zero day are the worst. It was your point; is the point.
The Copy? Lmaoooooo. The only thing remotely similar between the JB iPhone and the S8 is the fact that both are black...unless you're implying that apple owns the color black? In terms of design, the S8 makes the iPhone look old. Hell if anything, isn't Apple copying Sammy....considering the next iPhone will be bezel-less with an OLED display? Hell some of the internals will even be made by Samsung. Hell the screen will made by Samsung. Sounds like the iGalaxy S8S.
Really? You think that the back button and app switcher are "problems"?? That is interesting. You like closing apps one at a time? You like having to reach to the top of a page to go back? Or have to double-click the Home button, then swipe until you find the app you were in before, then click on it? I guess you're one of the folks that loved Apple's one-button mice too.
I'm also betting that many of the features on my list will come to iPhone, just not yet. But when they do, then they'll be "amazing" or "done right".
So yep, you're right. Not everyone's needs are the same. Thank God Google and Sammy listen to "the rest of us".
No, that's your play. I pointed out that ios is safer due to the distribution and percentage of red zone vulnerabilities. I never claimed ios is 100% safe.
[/quote]
)
Why don't you check what the red zone items are for in your own link? Sure IOS had red zone items, but android had twice the number. No amount of deflecting gets around the information you posted.
Pro-tip of the day. It's not "iphone fans" that start off with mis-information.Well, if iphone fans didnt start off with mis-information first like "android is unstable/crash a lot" or "android is unsafe", then there is no need for android fans to "correct" these slanders. (not tit-for-tat
A well balanced, fair enough story.
No matter how the deflections the numbers in the red-zone for android speak for themselves. CVE is the gold standard on this. icloud Photo leaks have nothing to do with this issue as that is strictly phishing. And google as I posted above, has had their gmail accounts hacked as well.
Instead of a cogent discussion, generalizations based on name calling means you have no point. There is no way you can refute the cve stats and thus the deflections, unfortunately. You can repeat the stats on crashing, but I'd rather have a crashed app than a plundered bank account. And if iCloud is unsafe google is also; plus the red zone vulnerabilities do not speak well for the ecosystem.
What do you think critical red zone vulnerabilities do and refer to, and why they might be rated that way? It's not that far fetched and hacking gmail can lead to loss of funds also. So it's not FUD as you say. If iOS has a hundred critical vulnerabilities android has four times that. You do the math. You have no way to refute cve stats.
Totally safe vs totally unsafe is a one person popular belief, an absolute position not held here.
I doubt you went through every thread on MR from the start of time. However, "fandom" (the sd-card kind) is not really something that is unique to this thread. At least we agree the stats from CVE are the stats. How, you want to spin them is something else.
The crash rate stat is garbage not all stats are created equal. Cve is the gold standard and the government uses that information.At the very least I didn't denounce the cve stat as "unreliable" like you did with the iOS crash rate stat
