Curiously no mention of processing speed, ease of use, virus protection, quality of 3rd party apps and no real quantifiable data other than battery life. and no mention of their testing methods. CR is a joke right now.
Although my days of 4S were mostly pleasant with very few hiccups, my experiences with later iOS's have been awful. From the 6, to 6s and now 7, iOS has been pretty abysmal for me in terms of stability. So many app crashes, general UI freezes, heck even the camera and phone default apps play up. The browser constantly decides to stop working too. It has actually made me consider returning back to Android - I mean I gave up the flexibility of Android for the stability of iOS, but now that is out the window, what am I doing in this walled garden. I am not even someone who installs lots of app's or a user of 3rd party app's, I generally almost always try use the default app
I am sure some of you will be like "I don't have any issues", but it is the same as Android users telling you about their faultless Android experiences, it doesn't really matter does it? It boils down to what you experience.
I guess the only thing going for iPhone 8 for me is, that I need it for the Apple Watch (which I do enjoy, haven't had any issues with it, although I don't do too much on it!).
The funny thing is that the iPhone 8 will be what the iPhone 7 should have been, but one year later and probably overpriced as it's technology all the other manufacturers have been selling for almost a year already at a more reasonable price.
Exactly. It's not just phones though. Read their reviews of cameras, they are equally funny. The things they choose as selection criteria are often comical and their testing methodologies are rather poor.Curiously no mention of processing speed, ease of use, virus protection, quality of 3rd party apps and no real quantifiable data other than battery life. and no mention of their testing methods. CR is a joke right now.
I've always been curious why this opinion is so pervasive on MR. It's wrong on it's premise, and impractical in it's application. CR compares items that are on sale now so that consumers can make an informed decision about products they want to buy now. Using your same logic, the review of the iPhone 7 could have been held until this year when the S8 came out. Products are reviewed when they are on the market. Reviews aren't held for any other products or product categories so why should phones be any different? If the reviews were only done once or twice a year, your argument might hold water. As is, it's a sieve.Seems pointless to judge one companies newest gen product with another's essentially last gen product. If CR was truely "honest" they would have held the story until the end of the year when then could compare the S8 with iPhone 8. Of course when the iPhone 8 comes out it will likely beat S8. Then S9 will beat iPhone 8. Rinse, wash, repeat. How does this help buyers? Seems like it's only point is to sell magazines and website subscriptions.
So which Samsung phone would they compare? By years end, Samsung will have the S8, S8+ and the Note 8 on the market.
The S8 is very fast. Apps launch quickly. And the curved and long display makes it really easy to use one handed.
Hint: A legitimate hardware issue is not related to OS stability. For that matter, actual screen reviews contradicts your claims. AMOLED has inherent strengths and weaknesses. Color accuracy is NOT a strength of AMOLED. Power efficiency is. Either way, AMOLED is clearly a stop gap on the way to MicroLED which has the best of both worlds.Look up the touch screen disease Apple updates their phone causes the quadrants to **** up and then ask their customers for $130 sorry ******** Apple when the Note 7 blew up they gave everybody Edge 7s free VR headsets and $100 all off contract I can see water droplets on my son's hand as rain falls with the S8 camera the iPhone 7 plus that I work with cannot I should also point out I don't think anybody realizes that Apple just ordered 20 million Samsung curved panels so they've clearly finally admitted Retina display pales in comparison to a Super AMOLED screen
The funny thing is that the iPhone 8 will be what the iPhone 7 should have been, but one year later and probably overpriced as it's technology all the other manufacturers have been selling for almost a year already at a more reasonable price.
Interesting post. You both describe yourself as being shallow for being concerned with appearance over functionality. Then, you go on to contradict yourself by mocking your own purchase decision. Keep posting... you're amusing.I always buy my phone based on the design ... i dont cure if a phone is a half second faster or if the camera has a xy better sensor. They all are great so what i am looking at by 2017 is the design.
My iPhone 7 Plus with its redic bezel looks like a tube tv next to a slim UHDTV compared to other phones on the market
As a iPhone user since the very beginning, in my opinion, the poor stability of iOS and virtually useless Siri voice recognition sets the bar to beat the iPhone pretty low these days.....
I own both. I am so dependent on iMessage it isn't even funny
I've always been curious why this opinion is so pervasive on MR. It's wrong on it's premise, and impractical in it's application. CR compares items that are on sale now so that consumers can make an informed decision about products they want to buy now. Using your same logic, the review of the iPhone 7 could have been held until this year when the S8 came out. Products are reviewed when they are on the market. Reviews aren't held for any other products or product categories so why should phones be any different? If the reviews were only done once or twice a year, your argument might hold water. As is, it's a sieve.
No, thanks. The device looks great (arguably, the best looking device out right now), but the software is a...hot...ass...mess. It really just kills the experience.
But that isn't true. You don't see head to head match ups pitting the latest and greatest of one with the soon-to-be retired product of another. It's a pointless read. Now if the product is old like a Canon 7D but still current and slated for an update then, sure, pit it against the Nikon D500. But everyone knows the iPhone 7 isn't long for this world. No one would recommend buying one right now unless you really needed a new phone and you wanted to stick with iOS. But someone buying a new phone from scratch? No, they aren't buying last year's phone. That's silly. That is why this match up is silly. They might as well put up a headline: "Amazing discovery 2+2 confirmed at equalling 4."
I don't think that will be a problem Apple always has a top notch device price might be high but you have to pay for quality .Later is always better than previous models, how does this comparison make sence, wait for the iPhone 8 and then see how it will blow away the galaxy S8
Interesting post. You both describe yourself as being shallow for being concerned with appearance over functionality. Then, you go on to contradict yourself by mocking your own purchase decision. Keep posting... you're amusing.
Yea lol and iCloud email address.I own both. I am so dependent on iMessage it isn't even funny
Maybe, but it doesn't have the iTunes or App Store... which IMO is much more important.