Correct me if I am wrong, but aren't 500gb SSD's in the $1300 range? To me, that is prohibitively expensive.
You are very correct, however I didn't mention anything about 500GB drives. Many people settle for SSD's with much less storage than traditional hard drives in order to get faster performance and more reliable hardware.
Correct me if I am wrong, but aren't 500gb SSD's in the $1300 range? To me, that is prohibitively expensive.
I bought mine when they were released and I've had no problems whatsoever. It's my main work machine at the moment (waiting for Mac Pro update) running CS3 for ten hours a day.
Just go for it
People usually only post about their problems.
btw, do not go for i7... price difference is significant, where performance is almost equal.
I don't know why people post this kind of information...its simply not true.
I posted this information on another thread but I'll do a simply recap:
If you are a power-user and I mean a true power-user where you are using VMWare, CS4/CS5, HandBrake, MathCad, Mathematica, et al, then the i7 is a cheap upgrade.
For example, one of the tasks I do in research requires CS 5, HUGE TIFF images, and PhotoShop scripts. The i7 is repeatedly 10% to 15% faster per script. When you start adding up the time savings its amazing over a long period of time (say a year).
If you plan on doing a lot of high end work and plan to keep the MBP for say 3 years, the i7 is a great upgrade. Its also not user-replaceable like RAM or the HDD. If you get the i7 now, you can always add more RAM or a large/faster HDD later when funds are more prevalent.
I'm not saying its for everyone but when you boil it down, the i7 is simply faster. For me, a $200 upgrade for a 15% boost is worth (read CHEAP!) the upgrade.
You guys are right, for the 17", the i7 is a more reasonable upgrade. Usually the situation involves a 15" and the asker says, "I don't really know much about it but hey 2.4Ghz < 2.66Ghz". These people might be expecting 10-15% improvement or more across the board, when it is really only during CPU-bound tasks for an 18% increase in price (for the 15" with educational discount). If they are limited in their budget they should probably spring for an SSD and see greater speedups across the board. If they can afford it and don't mind the decrease in Price/Performance ratio, then sure, get the i7 AND the SSD.
We tend to speak in terms of price/performance sweetspot, and the 15" 2.4Ghz i5 is where that sweetspot is. If you must throw another $200-300 at it, then the sweetspot is 15" 2.4Ghz with an SSD, still not the i7.
If you really want to talk about the "sweet spot", I'd say its at microcenter for $999 for the 2.4GHz 13" macbook pro that can do most of the things that the 15" 2.4GHz i5 can do for most people while being $750 cheaper.
So you're going to wait 5+ months for a minimal upgrade?i think im gonna wait till they release the new mbp i7 2.8 ghz. i always like having the newest thing
hi guys,
Will i7 generate a lot of heat at the wrist resting area?
Correct me if I am wrong, but aren't 500gb SSD's in the $1300 range? To me, that is prohibitively expensive.
My MacBook Pro i7 won't go to sleep automatically. I think it's an OS X issue though.
Here's a link to an Apple thread that explains the issue, which I believe is common to MBPs. It's just hard to notice if you're not looking for it.
http://discussions.info.apple.com/thread.jspa?messageID=11455942�
oops, another issue? dam, so this is an universal issue or uncommon one?
Also, due to my budget, i am thinking of either MBP 15 i7 or MBP 17 i5, considering i might play some games on it, the MBP 15 option might be a better choice, isn't it?
I bought mine when they were released and I've had no problems whatsoever.
Just go for it
I get this sleep issue on my i7 15" but I've had this sleep problem on every Mac notebook I have ever owned. This automatic sleep feature has simply been broken in MacOS X for a very long time.