The keyring is attached to a clear cover, not to the charging case itself.This is just added to avoid a lawsuit. They can say its not a direct copy due to adding that.
The keyring is attached to a clear cover, not to the charging case itself.This is just added to avoid a lawsuit. They can say its not a direct copy due to adding that.
It depends on what aspect of the product is being protected. Surely Apple owns the "Apple" and "AirPods" trademarks, in addition to the Apple logo and the AirPods silhouette logo. Apple probably even already owns the mark for "AirPods 3" as well. It is usually those things that Apple usually uses to prohibit counterfeiters. At the end of the day it's about brand and consumer confusion. Even though these aren't identical to existing AirPods, they look close enough to existing AirPods that a consumer might be confused into believing they are genuine Apple AirPods.I feel this is legally really interesting... Can an unreleased and yet to be officially confirmed product be protected by law? Who's to say who copied who in that case? Unless they use an Apple logo or something of course.
Can they be called counterfeit when the item they're supposedly counterfeiting doesn't even exist? 🤔Despite AirPods 3 not yet being officially announced by Apple, counterfeit products of the unreleased earbuds have already hit the market.
Sure they can. They are purporting to be something they are not. Even if the product is not yet available to the consumer, they do exist, at least in preproduction form. And people are naïve/gullible enough to believe that these could be legitimate.Can they be called counterfeit when the item they're supposedly counterfeiting doesn't even exist? 🤔
Technically, it is made in imitation of a rumored future product which no one has publicly stated they've seen in real life.Merriam-Webster says that counterfeit means "made in imitation of something else with intent to deceive." It is made in imitation of a future product known to exist with the intent to deceive the suckers who think they're getting the deal of a lifetime before anyone else.
i soo hope you're rightThe real AirPods 3 never leaked. It was all these clones, it's pretty obvious.
not having a keychain attached would be a start.What’s the right way to do it?
You are correct. I tried this after hearing rumors that the new ones would be Pros without the tips. I took the tips off my Pros, stuck them in my ears and they did not stay put long enough to determine comfort. Not a good design IMO.They don't even sit in the case properly. Complete nonsense.
Besides, I don't have a pair of Pro to try, but I would very much doubt that they would comfortably sit in the ear without the rubber part.
I don’t think Apple is planning a refresh to the AirPod Pros this year, go ahead and replace yours. They are expected to refresh the regular AirPods to a v3 (no noise canceling).are we seeing new AirPods pros this year? or shall I buy a replacement now for my lost ones :/
What if you want to attach it to something for security so you don’t lose it?not having a keychain attached would be a start.
What if you want to attach it to something for security so you don’t lose it?
not being deliberately obtuse here; I really don’t know what it is you’re talking about and I’m intrigued.
Lol “pose a danger”. Yeah scary...
A tiny carabiner doesn’t compromise portability at all, especially not of the AirPods themselves which remain in the ear? Just means you can clip the case to a bag so you know where it is.Improving AirPod's find my capability would be a start. One thing would be to put dedicated bluetooth chip into the case (currently it doesn't have a bluetooth chip since it uses the AirPod's bluetooth) and keep bluetooth alive for at least a few hours after closing the lid so you can locate with Find My app.
All you're really doing with a keychain attachment is making the device less portable. Anything that's less portable is likely harder to lose for obvious reasons but the whole point of AirPods is...portability.