Judging by the timing, I'm betting who ever did it is pissed at the retailers who are blocking Apple Pay, doesn't like how CurrentC works, and wants to give a good example of why it's a bad idea.
And I'm sure it worked.But I'm not sure how many clueless who don't understand why it's a bad idea will clue in from it (they already signed up for it so they already showed they are willing to give away risky information).
----------
Not to mention that a merchant's servers are a lot more appealing to a hacker than just one person's phone. One person's phone may or may not have good info to steal. A whole server full of bank account numbers and SSN's is gaurenteed to have not just one bit of good info, but a whole ton.
It's the difference between robbing random person on the street and going to a bank to robbing all the accounts in the bank. Except in this case the person on the street probably has at least as good security if not better than the bank. So where do you think the robber is going to go in that situation?
And I'm sure it worked.But I'm not sure how many clueless who don't understand why it's a bad idea will clue in from it (they already signed up for it so they already showed they are willing to give away risky information).
----------
Lolz. Yeah. A merchant-controlled cloud service is more secure than an encrypted secure enclave in my palm. This is stupid.
Not to mention that a merchant's servers are a lot more appealing to a hacker than just one person's phone. One person's phone may or may not have good info to steal. A whole server full of bank account numbers and SSN's is gaurenteed to have not just one bit of good info, but a whole ton.
It's the difference between robbing random person on the street and going to a bank to robbing all the accounts in the bank. Except in this case the person on the street probably has at least as good security if not better than the bank. So where do you think the robber is going to go in that situation?