Everybody asked for more pro apps on the iPad's and when they finally arrive nobody really wants or needs them 
Its free??! DaVinci is a completely free app (competing with the paid apps like FCP and Premiere). Its only the studio version that commands the extra price. Most people have no need of the studio, if you do then its not much to pay.Must be one of the most expensive apps I've heard of in a while? I have no use for it but it will be interesting to see what others make of it. Perhaps it's release could 'persuade' Apple to finally releases its pro apps on iPad?
That’s an odd statement. iPads have always used Apple Silicon. Or does this mean it won’t run on A series chips?DaVinci Resolve for iPad was announced in October 2022 and is designed to be optimized for iPads with Apple silicon chips
This faux confusion is unnecessary. When Apple said they are transitioning their Macs to “apple silicon”, did you think they meant M# chips or A# chips?That’s an odd statement. iPads have always used Apple Silicon. Or does this mean it won’t run on A series chips?
Yup, as a Lumafusion user it has been really nice especially for the price that it is, but it was missing a lot. Along with iPads getting the external monitor support it is just another step closer to a tablet being the one device for most.This is definitely a shot across LumaFusion's bow.
Davinci Resolve is making waves by offering a free version on MacOS and now on iPadOS. While it doesn't have high end features, it will accomplish a lot of what most users need.
I saw a prompt that pops when you want to use some of the premium effects.I can’t find the in app purchase for Resolve studio. Does anyone know where it is?
No it isn't. Ask how many people what the marketing term, Apple Silicon means. Only us nerds will reply with a correct answer.This faux confusion is unnecessary. When Apple said they are transitioning their Macs to “apple silicon”, did you think they meant M# chips or A# chips?
When Apple uses the expression "Apple Silicon" is always to refer to their M# Processors.This faux confusion is unnecessary. When Apple said they are transitioning their Macs to “apple silicon”, did you think they meant M# chips or A# chips?
Yep, prior to the M1 we never heard the term Apple Silicon referring to the A# devices. There is even a product page on the App Store that tells you what the deal is.When Apple uses the expression "Apple Silicon" is always to refer to their M# Processors.
Transitioning their Macs to Apple Silicon means transitioning their Macs CPUs from Intel Processors to M# Chips.
The Apple Silicon Chip is an all-in-one Component: Processor (CPU), GPU (Graphics Chip), RAM, SSD, and more. All this now integrated in a single very efficient Chip.
It's laughable, bordering embarrassing, the amount of people around here who put on this faux confusion regarding all things Apple. This is just another means to an end for them, along with how utterly confusing they find the iPad line up, how completely fazed they are that an iPad can exist alongside a mac but not have macOS, how the iPad cant be pro because Apple havent released their limited and frankly quite sub par collection of pro apps.Of course this faux confusion is unnecessary when a product page exists.
View attachment 2131777
View attachment 2131781
You don’t understand.I don’t understand this whole appeal to do video editing on an iPad. You cannot possibly do complex video editing on iPad OS in an effective manner compared to on a Mac.
It’s like telling a car mechanic that the technology exists for them to now be able to change oil using oven mitts and Dixie cups because the tools are more portable! 🤪