Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
sarae said:
Not just Congress; it's so everyone has more light in the evening. Do you prefer it when the sun sets before 6pm? I personally wish they'd keep Daylight Savings year round - I would love if it stayed lighter even the tiniest bit later in the winter.

Yes, I prefer the sun setting before 6pm. To me it represents the nicer and cooler weather. They should just set the time and leave it that way year round. Indiana has the intelligent idea, they don't change.
 
Can't we meet at a half-way point, say 30 minutes, so none of this clock-setting business.
 
Why don't we get rid of time all together and just start over from scratch, including calendars and the like. We could remake the length of a second and a minute etc. so we don't end up with this 1/4 day crap that results in a leap year. That'll fix everybody's wagon.
 
leftbanke7 said:
Why don't we get rid of time all together and just start over from scratch, including calendars and the like. We could remake the length of a second and a minute etc. so we don't end up with this 1/4 day crap that results in a leap year. That'll fix everybody's wagon.
So, how do you propose to accelerate or decelerate the rotation of the Earth so that a whole number of rotations (365.0000) are made for each revolution around the Sun?
 
Lacero said:
Can't we meet at a half-way point, say 30 minutes, so none of this clock-setting business.
They've already done that in India... the entire country, as large (wide) as it is, is all on ONE time zone, 30 minutes out of phase with the rest of the world's time zones.
 
wdlove said:
Yes, I prefer the sun setting before 6pm. To me it represents the nicer and cooler weather. They should just set the time and leave it that way year round. Indiana has the intelligent idea, they don't change.

I guess you missed my earlier post about Indiana's time zone/DST problems
They do it the least intelligent of any of them :)
 
sarae said:
Just bumping up this thread; the House and Senate agreed to extend Daylight Savings.. will start three weeks earlier in March and end one week later in the fall.
Thanks for letting us know. I didn't hear about this on the news. This has an adverse affect that's not mentioned: When the start of Daylight Savings Time coincides with April Fool's day, it's handy for clock pranks, such as setting your coworkers clock an hour different in the wrong direction. Heh heh. Oh well.

According to some senators, farmers complained that a two-month extension could adversely affect livestock, and airline officials said it would have complicated scheduling of international flights.
Does this mean that livestock wear watches? Or is this bill going to change the behavior of the sun, rather than just the habits of Americans?
 
clayj said:
They've already done that in India... the entire country, as large (wide) as it is, is all on ONE time zone, 30 minutes out of phase with the rest of the world's time zones.

Newfoundland (Canada) also is off by 30 minutes.
 
crazzyeddie said:
IF President Bush signs off on it.

President Bush will sign the bill as long as it has the provisions that he's interesting in having. He has been calling for a national energy policy for years. It is something that we need, the United States needs to become more sufficient.

Not really sure that the change of daylight savings time makes any sense. The whole idea is government interference. Happy to see that they plan to do a study to find the efficacy of this proposal.
 
Inspector Lee said:
Didn't Nixon extend daylight savings back in '72 or '73 in an effort to save coin due to an oil crisis? That was before my time so I may be in error...
Yes, I believe he did, or at least it was in that general time period. And several school children were run over while getting on or waiting for busses in Florida that year. I believe that Florida refused to go on DST the following year because of that.
 
clayj said:
They've already done that in India... the entire country, as large (wide) as it is, is all on ONE time zone, 30 minutes out of phase with the rest of the world's time zones.

China does that as well.

Daylight Savings makes more sense the farther north you go.

In LA, at a measly 30 degrees latitude Dec 21st has a sunrise at 6:55 AM. If that were to be 7:55 AM that wouldn't really be a disaster

Up here in Vancouver (49 degrees latitude) the sun doesn't come up until 8:05 on that day, making it 9:05 would mean a significant amount or morning activity in the dark! You have no idea how depressing it is to go to work before the sun comes up, and leave work after it goes down.

Now, if we move to another major city, Edmonton (54 degrees latitude) a non-daylight-savings world would get sunrise at 9:49 AM! They'd be done their morning coffee already before they got to enjoy some light.

This is actually causing a stir in Canada, because for economic (trade) reasons we would probably have to follow; US companies get confused enough with the different thanksgiving, different times would be too much. Following this system is going to mean some pretty nasty sunrise and sunsets for major Canadian cities.

Going the other way doesn't work very well either (kill "Standard time" and just stay on daylight) -- as it is the sun for me is coming up at 5:30 in the morning right now (1/2 hour later than it was a month ago). I really don't relish 4 AM sunrises -- I would never get any sleep!
 
We don't have daylight savings time here in my province - we're the only province that doesn't change our clocks back or forwards. It can get confusing when dealing with people in other provinces, being in CST and MDT depending on the time of year, but it is quite fun being stubborn. :cool:
 
~loserman~ said:
Hmmm.
Since daylight savings time is actually an American invention the rest of the world has been doing it somewhat like us.
Benjamin Franklin was the creator of Daylight Savings time.
Franklin didn't suggest DST just that people should get up earlier.William Willet first proposed it(quite possibly thousands of others thought of it first).

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daylight_saving_time
Sorry for double post will read all postings before jumping in in future.
 
~Shard~ said:
We don't have daylight savings time here in my province - we're the only province that doesn't change our clocks back or forwards. It can get confusing when dealing with people in other provinces, being in CST and MDT depending on the time of year, but it is quite fun being stubborn. :cool:

Ahh, yes. I remember looking for a place to have a beer with lunch on one trip there, and getting really strange stares.

Finally, I realized that having crossed a timezone + losing daylight savings, it wasn't 11:30 in the morning, it was 9:30...

Speaking of which, I have never understood the term daylight "savings". Right now I get approximately 16 hours of sunlight a day. I don't need to save any of it, there's already too much!

Now, in the winter when I'm getting 8 hours of sun (assuming its not clouded over and raining, which is pretty much a given here at that time of year) -- that's when I would be happy to "save" some daylight :confused: :confused:
 
Macaddicttt said:
Arizona doesn't have it and I believe they only have one time zone.

Yep, one time zone, although a Native American reservation does observe DST, which seems a little weird... I was recently having an argument what time zone Arizona is in. Technically, it's Mountain. But half of the year it's on Pacific time, so it doesn't really make complete sense. Whatever though, I've lived here all my life an never had to change clocks, I'm not complaining :D ;)
 
stcanard said:
Ahh, yes. I remember looking for a place to have a beer with lunch on one trip there, and getting really strange stares.

Finally, I realized that having crossed a timezone + losing daylight savings, it wasn't 11:30 in the morning, it was 9:30...

Heh heh - regardless of the time change, you simply weren't going to the right places... ;)
 
This is the stupidest thing I have ever heard.

Usually I don't mind when the Americans do something dumb like this, but this also effects us in Canada. If Canada doesn't also change time with the US, we will for 2 non consecutive months a year, be off by one hour from people in the same time zone as us.

:confused:
 
mac-er said:
I have never understood how someone could not like DST. Do you actually like it to get dark at 5pm?
Yes. The Sun seems to have no problem with it. Colombia tried to move their clocks around one year during the Gaviria era and it drove them nuts. They are smart people.
X
 
IndyGopher said:
You want more light? Move towards the equator.

Interestingly, this time of year the sun actually sets earlier in the equator than up north. Puerto Rico is dark by 7:30-8 PM IIRC from when I spent summers there.
 
Lara F said:
Interestingly, this time of year the sun actually sets earlier in the equator than up north. Puerto Rico is dark by 7:30-8 PM IIRC from when I spent summers there.

Oficial sunset time in Quito now is 18:27 (6:27 p.m.) local which is on the equator and equal to U.S. CDT until the change.
x
 
wdlove said:
President Bush will sign the bill as long as it has the provisions that he's interesting in having. He has been calling for a national energy policy for years. It is something that we need, the United States needs to become more sufficient.

Not really sure that the change of daylight savings time makes any sense. The whole idea is government interference. Happy to see that they plan to do a study to find the efficacy of this proposal.


wdlove, I am not sure that I agree with you on Bush's desire for a national energy policy. So much more could and should have been done to increase the CAFE figures given the change in the global "oil climate". Count me as one that doubts this White House's resolve to protect the energy reserves of this nation, or to protect the people from the "oil barons" here in the US.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.