Unfortunately yes it got there. My original point was credit issues are one's own fault no matter how much your income is and money in the bank.
No-one is arguing that. But my point is that stating that someone shouldn't do X because of their credit being Y, and equating that to not living in their means is bollocks. personally, I have lived within our means, and while having the ability to get what I need outright, that does nothing for improving my credit. That doesn't mean that I am not or can not live within my means, and the assumption that less than stellar credit = not living within means is incorrect.
In my predicament, car is paid. For the house, losing over half its value really took a hit for me, and to be honest, what is the logic in paying 200% of the amount that the house is worth? Again, like I said, that is the only activity on my report.
Additionally, having to pay out of pocket for an
ocular enucleation for my wife's eye is what took me over (
WARNING: contains very graphic photos). But if that's being equated to not living within means, I'll take that and wear it pridefully, as I'd rather pay that out of pocket and my children have their mother and me have my wife, than have bacteria fly up her optic nerve and killing her, just to have my house payments in to keep my credit in shape.
Again, my point is that people don't know other's financial situations to assume that they are crappy with their finances. Be all/end all is that while people can't do the AUP, they shouldn't also live with the stigma that they are crappy with money and finances.
BL.