Let this be the last time that's said on the thread![]()
Uggghh...and I'm commenting on the design alone. It's so...1990's. Chunky black plastic housing. Hope the stuff inside and onscreen is better than the crap look of the exterior. Looks like a cheapo Garmin from here.
It is, is it not? In terms of function (not viewing pleasure/ease) what does the iPad do that the iPod can't? However, ironically, this is no longer a valid argument since the iPod can do a bunch more than the iPad now. That said, I don't really think it is complaining per se, just pointing out a fact.
I too am one that thinks a 3, 4, 5, 7, 10 sized selection is stupid. have a smaller and a larger tablet...done.
Yeah, I'm all for competition, but the flurry of sizes seems a bit peculiar. It seems to me that they may run into issues with pricing.
Wrong! the ipad screens are made to order. If they were off the shelf then you could have a valid point.
Sorry kiddo.
Fail!!!
Apple laptops come in 5 different bodies types and people think that's normal. I think it's odd that with iPad people complained that 2 was too many ("Why do we need an iPad when it's just a big iPod Touch!?") and now the possibility of 3 types (9", 7", and iPod) is bringing out the same types of comments again.
What is it about laptops that makes 5 types ok when (apparently) 3 sizes of iPad/iPods is "crazy?"
This is about as funny as the Microsoft store employees' dance.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TSAXEVXvNz8
Gee I wonder where MS got the idea to open stores. Apple should be flattered that everyone tries so desperately to copy them.
Apple laptops come in 5 different bodies types and people think that's normal. I think it's odd that with iPad people complained that 2 was too many ("Why do we need an iPad when it's just a big iPod Touch!?") and now the possibility of 3 types (9", 7", and iPod) is bringing out the same types of comments again.
What is it about laptops that makes 5 types ok when (apparently) 3 sizes of iPad/iPods is "crazy?"
ummmm, Remember Gateway retail stores?
Competition is a very good thing.
Glad to see some big name companies stepping into the arena.![]()
Na, Dude is totally right! The Tablet is a joke, but if it causes Apple to increase innovation/price performance/features by a micron...its a good thing! Keep making FUGLY tablets Dell, and we can reap the benefits of Apple's reprise.
I think they should call it the "Helen Keller"...
I don't get, that many seem not to get it. Was the word "app" used the way it is now before the iPhone (iOS) Apple OWNS the market here just like they dominated the iPod market. First came the device (iPod) and now iPad, then came the content integration (iTunes) for the (iPod) and the App store for the iPad. It didn't matter how cool the competitive mp3 players were - they were nothing compared to the iPod due in large part because of the iTunes (content) integration. This market - the future of computing will also be OWNED by Apple because of the HUGE lead in the App market. This is even more significant than in the mp3 player arena because at least there, the same content (music) was still available without Apple. In the iOS case - a significant amount of the desired content is NON-EXISTENT for a non-Apple device. Yes Android is second - but it's a far far second place. They came so late to the table. Their market is open - but anyone who has any sense of proper functionality, GUI, efficiency; etc will tell you the comparison of the Apps of iOS and Android don't simply stop at the numbers of apps either. So, even if a company made a more desirable looking (feeling) device, which is a significant IF - without the integration of the Apple apps - they have nothing. Nothing.
I too am one that thinks a 3, 4, 5, 7, 10 sized selection is stupid. have a smaller and a larger tablet...done.
Let this be the last time that's said on the thread![]()
Perfect! While the others are all focusing on the hardware, Jobs is spending time making sure the content is there and that operation of the device is intuitive. When all these other tablets hit the stores, customers will continue to buy Apple not based on the raw device specs but what the "experience" of using the device is like and what they can do with it. If a cleaner GUI results in the user being able to perform a task quicker and easier, the hardware specs are irrelevant. If the tablet cannot perform a function because there is no App for it or it cannot easily access media the user wants, the hardware specs are irrelevant.
Of course those who do not understand this will continue to confirm it by posting how "people are sheep by continuing to buy anything Apple makes just because it has the Apple logo on it". They just don't get it...