It depends on the Mac mini. If it’s an M1, it would only support one monitor. But you could have an infinite number of virtual monitors within that monitor.Problem is, we just don’t know anything. At all. What actual useful information have we gleaned from these silly articles? They’re working on a headset and it might be expensive. Ok. What’s the vision here? What are we gonna use this for? What’s the killer app? Like…just why?
I know augmented reality as a concept can have real world applications. Just look at all the sci-fi we’ve watched over the years with holographic displays and control panels. But how big is it, what’s the usage like. I say again. What do they expect us to actually do with it?
will it replace the need for screens? Like i can put it on and have a pinned 80 inch tv screen in my field of view so i wont even need to buy one? Will it replace computer monitors so i could just take a mac mini with me and have dual displays anywhere? Even in a motel room? Will there be an entirely new interface for things where i can use touch gestures to control the interface?
something like this
Disagree, that would be a ridiculous price for a consumer product. The first version is pro, for engineering, medical, and scientific visualization. It will also provide a development platform for the 2.0 version.The issue I have with this product is the rumoured pricing $3-5000 which is the current estimate. At that price point you would want something that ‘fits into our daily lives’ as Tim puts it.
Those OLED displays in those iPhones and those monitors? I am most certain that they are manufactured by LG.Lots of companies don't make cars or glasses. While I would have liked to see what Apple could come up with... I'm not that upset at Apple.
At least Apple still makes phones. LG couldn't handle it and they exited the phone market.
In fact... LG doesn't make cars, glasses, or phones... what losers!
![]()
Apple's not building a car. That would be a stupid product for Apple. They are, however, developing stuff that fits within an automotive ecosystem.How's Apple going to build car in 2026 if they can't even build a glasses?
Glass was awful in pretty much every way you can imagine.Google had people complain about glasses. It wasn't great but people cried about privacy. I want to see it happen.
is there a reason you’re using a diminutive of Tim’s name? Is it because your argument has no merit? Or do you know Tim personally?Timmy just hasn't found a way to turn it into a service yet. That's all.
50 years? 50 YEARS?It will require some technological breakthroughs (batteries, display/optics tech). Those are unpredictable. 10 years seems on the short side, could be 50 years or more.
Or five more years of it.At least the delay means no more of that hideous ski googles graphic from Macrumors!
at the time there wasn't anything else. it was good for the time.Glass was awful in pretty much every way you can imagine.
Still, it felt insanely cool. *+
* former glasshole
+ back when I thought it was kewl to be super online
mixed reality is the term Microsoft gave to their VR headsets.“
According to Bloomberg, some Apple employees do not believe that Apple will ever ship AR glasses. Most of Apple's AR/VR group is working on the mixed reality headsets that Apple is planning to produce, but there are still some that are exploring technology for future AR glasses.
Rather than developing augmented reality glasses, Apple is now focused on creating a more affordable mixed reality headset that will appeal to a wider range of consumers.”
Can someone explain how “mixed reality” is different from “augmented reality”?
Those OLED displays in those iPhones and those monitors? I am most certain that they are manufactured by LG.
I love how many people just gave up immediately upon seeing this. If you just did a bit of digging, you’ll know there was literally an AR optic breakthrough today. It’s only a matter of when not if before this is ready for the public. Please delete this reply thanks…
Apple has paused development on the augmented reality Apple Glasses that it planned to introduce after its mixed reality headset, reports Bloomberg. Work on the product has been postponed because of technical difficulties.
![]()
Rumors suggested that Apple wanted to develop a pair of lightweight augmented reality glasses that would be similar to the Google Glass smart glasses. The glasses would provide digital information overlaid on the real world rather than offering immersive virtual experiences like the AR/VR headset, but Apple has not been able to develop the necessary hardware to produce a lightweight wearable that has the power of an iPhone and enough battery life to run it.
Apple initially wanted to release the Apple Glasses in 2023 before delaying the project to 2025, but now the product's launch has been postponed "indefinitely." Apple has also scaled back work on the device, so Apple Glasses will not be launching in the foreseeable future, but Bloomberg says that Apple considers AR glasses to be a product that could one day replace the iPhone.
According to Bloomberg, some Apple employees do not believe that Apple will ever ship AR glasses. Most of Apple's AR/VR group is working on the mixed reality headsets that Apple is planning to produce, but there are still some that are exploring technology for future AR glasses.
Rather than developing augmented reality glasses, Apple is now focused on creating a more affordable mixed reality headset that will appeal to a wider range of consumers. The first AR/VR headset that is set to launch this year will cost somewhere around $3,000, so Apple wants to provide similar capabilities at a cheaper price point in the future.
Details on all of the features included in the first mixed reality headset can be found in our AR/VR roundup.
Article Link: Development on Augmented Reality 'Apple Glasses' Postponed Indefinitely