DIFFERENCES 2009 MP vs. 2010 MP

Discussion in 'Mac Pro' started by brock2621, Jul 29, 2010.

  1. brock2621 macrumors 6502a

    brock2621

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2007
    Location:
    Kentucky
    #1
    I was wanting to post the differences between the two for myself and others so that we can all easily compare and evaluate performance vs. price.
     
  2. Hellhammer Moderator

    Hellhammer

    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2008
    Location:
    Finland
    #2
    2010 Mac Pro can use the new Gulftown and Westmere CPUs (Xeon 36xx and 56xx) and supports 1333MHz DDR3. It comes with better GPU (5770 vs GT 120) and AirPort card. Those are the main differences I can come up with. It may be possible to flash the EFI from 2010 Mac Pro to 2009 Mac Pro and gain the possibility of using the new CPUs in 2009 Mac Pro
     
  3. brock2621 thread starter macrumors 6502a

    brock2621

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2007
    Location:
    Kentucky
    #3
    Does the EFI contain information regarding the ram? If you flash it, will it try to be looking for 1333 ram? Also, the video card should be able to be purchased separately and installed into a 2009 MP correct?

    Have any past generations of Mac Pros been successfully flashed to work with future processors?
     
  4. Cocoia macrumors member

    Cocoia

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2010
    #4
    No clue on EFI, but the most important part of the EFI firmware will be stepping. Since the newer Xeons have different stepping they're incompatible with the current motherboard.

    Nobody knows if Apple will release graphics upgrade kits again. Let's hope so. I don't believe previous Mac Pros have ever been reflashed, but that's also because there weresocket / architecture changes (going from the 3,1 (Intel 5400 -> X58 / QuickPath).
     
  5. Hellhammer Moderator

    Hellhammer

    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2008
    Location:
    Finland
    #5
    Yeah, it will likely enable 1333MHz RAM as well but you can still use 1066MHz if you like to. Apple has offered GPUs in the past so likely yes.
     
  6. iRobertM macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2009
    Location:
    Seattle WA.
    #6
    I thought the 2010 MP comes with a bigger power supply?
     
  7. brock2621 thread starter macrumors 6502a

    brock2621

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2007
    Location:
    Kentucky
    #7
    Likely, although the new processors are 32nm I believe which would require less power?
     
  8. Hellhammer Moderator

    Hellhammer

    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2008
    Location:
    Finland
    #8
    They require the same. 130W for SP configs, 80Wx2 in 8-core and 95Wx2 in 12-core. AFAIK the PSU is still the same, 1000W
     
  9. brock2621 thread starter macrumors 6502a

    brock2621

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2007
    Location:
    Kentucky
    #9
    So if i'm understanding this correctly... it's literally almost the exact same machine? I wonder why it took them so long to release it? Maybe just waiting on the processors?

    So the 2009 & 2010 have only an EFI modification (most likely encrypted?) that needs to be flashed for all 2009 to literally be exactly 2010's? If EFI's ARE flashed... 2009 MP just retained 100% of their value.
     
  10. peskaa macrumors 68020

    peskaa

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2008
    Location:
    London, UK
    #10
    Yes, it is literally the same machine but with a change to EFI to allow the new CPUs etc. Makes me feel good about my Quad from early this year though.
     
  11. strausd macrumors 68030

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2008
    Location:
    Texas
    #11
    Maybe the GPUs too? But it definitely shouldn't have taken them this long. The new ones have the new CPUs, new GPUs, faster RAM, built in wifi, larger stock HD, and for what its worth comes with a magic mouse :)

    Also, I don't think the prices are much different. I went on Apples site and built a "comparable" machine. It is a 2009 8-core 2.66 GHz with a 1TB HD, 4870 (closest thing to a 5770), Magic Mouse, and a wifi card. All of this cost $5,069.

    Now a 2010 12-core Mac Pro. Now a base 12-core MP at 2.66 GHz with a 1TB HD, 5770 (barely better than 4870, but still better), Magic Mouse, and built in wifi. All of this is $4,999. The differences between these is that one is 8-core/16 threads and the other is 12-core/24 threads. The one with more cores and barely better GPU (can hook up more displays too) is cheaper than the one with less cores!

    So in a way, Apple lowered the price on this and gave it more performance for the money.

    Also, does anyone know when we will be able to order the 2010 MPs?
     
  12. peskaa macrumors 68020

    peskaa

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2008
    Location:
    London, UK
    #12
    The 5 series GPUs have been out since late 2009, early 2010. So no, they weren't waiting on GPUs.

    Secondly, Apple haven't "lowered" the price, they've simply been charging obscene prices for obsolete hardware. The fact that a new system will be faster than the old for the same price is simply how computing works.

    As for ordering, August.
     
  13. strausd macrumors 68030

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2008
    Location:
    Texas
    #13
    Does the pc version of the 5770 and 5870 have two MDP and a dvi? If not, maybe they needed some time to do that? We all know it takes Apple forever to get new GPUs, so no surprise there.

    And I'm pretty sure 4999 is less that 5069, so yes, they did lower the price. Sure, that price difference is extremely minimal, but also consider you are getting 8 more virtual cores for $70 less.

    Well I know august, I was wondering if anyone had a specific date. I've heard august 9th from someone on here but wasn't sure if that was true.
     
  14. Roman23 macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2010
    #14
    I can answer this one.. in full,.

    You are asking for the differences? Really, there are three and only three differences.. the good news is that the 2010 is a 2009 mac pro EXCEPT that Apple took the firmware and flashed it to make it support westmere.. Whether the lower end quad-cores 2.8/3.2 support westmere is still in the air. but the logic board is the same part number.. the processor tray is the exact same part number(see the slots in the quad?? - still 4!)..

    So, really the following is the same:

    2009 Logic board
    2009 Processor tray
    the whole set up, fans, etc.. case.

    What has changed:

    EFI Firmware to support westmere and 1333 mhz memory(this should have been fixed in the 09's from the get go!)
    \New juicy video cards.. 5870 and 5770, personally, I'd get the 5870 and call it a day.

    Thats it..
    No more, no less.. there is your 2010 mac pro in its glory.. you pay ROYALLY for the efi firmware of 2499(if the two low end quad nehalems are supported by B1), 3499 for the 8-core 2.4 which is a joke compared to the 09 original 8-cores.. and the big daddy of all - 12-core at 4999.99 or 5 grand + stratosphere.

    Thats it.


     
  15. Roman23 macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2010
    #15
    Power supply

    Is the same.. 980w.

    Everything is 2009 here.. except for the firmware, and video cards.


     
  16. Hellhammer Moderator

    Hellhammer

    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2008
    Location:
    Finland
    #16
    Can I have the part numbers, please. You can't know this stuff yet as 2010 Mac Pro isn't available yet. It's possible and even likely that they are the same but don't say that the part number is a match unless you can prove that
     
  17. Roman23 macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2010
    #17
    New question.. the two lower quad cores.

    I have currently a 3.33 w3580 in what was my 2.66 mac pro.. question, is it likely that the lower quads using 2.8 and 3.2(w3530 and w3565) will support B1 STEPPING?? this is important as I just got a one time exception from apple to RMA my current mac pro and goto the "2010" (or 2009 /w westmere support), but only if the lower quads support B1..

    Does anyone know if they will have the firmware to run B1 in the future? I am not talking about the 6-core machine.. but the two lower quad-singles in the line up.

    Any answer to this would be greatly appreciated as I have very little time to make a decision.. they gave me until august 9th(august 9th btw is the ACTUAL date when the news ones will be online for order, in case anyone wants to know.), and if you don't believe me I will glady get a customer care agent on the phone with you and they will tell you..

    They told me last night and an apple tech at tech support also told me AUGUST 9TH.


     
  18. Roman23 macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2010
    #18
    I tell you..

    its the same boards! But, here is the part number..

    Processor board(dual): 661-4998
    Backpane main logic board: 661-4996 - for all dual and single-quad
    Quad-core processor board: 661-4999

    Why would apple have new part numbers for these if the 2010 uses 2009 parts?? Even the Apple technician told me that Apple didn't revise the logic board or processor tray and is using the same parts.. just the firmware was flashed and he agreed that that was the case...

    But I have listed the part numbers from you.. my source was the 2009 pull apart service guide that I got.


     
  19. Hellhammer Moderator

    Hellhammer

    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2008
    Location:
    Finland
    #19
    Apple techs have been proven to know nothing about these kinds of things. It's unlikely that he has even seen the new one let alone know the part numbers. Not that it makes any difference but it's misleading if you state your guesses as facts. There is a great chance that the parts are exactly the same but lets wait for some proofs before saying so, okay?
     
  20. Roman23 macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2010
    #20
    Would you like the service guide??

    I have it if you want it.. so you can see I am not lying.. I wouldn't make anything like this up.


     
  21. Hellhammer Moderator

    Hellhammer

    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2008
    Location:
    Finland
    #21
    Yeah, but it's the 2009 service guide. I believe you that those numbers are correct but there is no way you could know that those are the same for 2010 model. Anyway, as there isn't any major difference we shouldn't argue about this.
     
  22. thermodynamic Suspended

    thermodynamic

    Joined:
    May 3, 2009
    Location:
    USA
    #22
    Agreed, re: 5870. The 5770 is virtually no faster than the 4870... according to a number of benchmark tests I've read. :(
     
  23. strausd macrumors 68030

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2008
    Location:
    Texas
    #23
    i saw some benchmarks and it beat it out in most of them, but only by a little bit. But its good that the 5770 can get you 3 displays instead of 2, and it uses less power.
     
  24. gaspra macrumors member

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2008
    #24
    Think about how the companies making profit in computer industry. The next gen platform will be Sandy Bridge and it's not too far from being implemented. As Apple always use propriety logic boards, it makes no sense to redesign the old one for no apparent reasons. Lenovo thinkstation still uses the 09 motherboards but with an updated bios to support westmere B1 stepping.
     
  25. wonderspark macrumors 68030

    wonderspark

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2010
    Location:
    Oregon
    #25
    You are known to be completely wrong about things. Here are other examples:
    I think it's admirable that you seek and desire great knowledge, but you don't do anyone a service by posting information that you do not possess. I don't understand your burning desire to be right about things that you don't know. If we were gambling on your information, we'd all be poor.
     

Share This Page