When did I dismiss that? I myself suggested using a sticker. Not buying the phone isn't a solution for me.
Not enabling it through software is the obvious solution.
When did I dismiss that? I myself suggested using a sticker. Not buying the phone isn't a solution for me.
The saphire itself is an electrical insulator.
Block the light transmission and you defeat the reader.
The metal ring will still trigger the reader but if it can't see..... end of story.
I'm guessing there will be hardware solutions to this (probably in the form of a home-button sticker).
As for Apple: I don't believe they're lying. I just don't think anyone's actually capable of making a network-attached biometric scanner bullet-proof. I don't want this to spoil an otherwise phenomenal phone for me, that's why I started the thread - I'm genuinely interested in solutions (which might already exist).
Finally some useful information - thanks.
I honestly think you are just overthinking it. Again unless Apple is blatantly lying to us, they have explained that no image of your fingerprint is taken/stored.
So not only one someone have to hack into the data on your phone but then they would have to find the same algorithm that is used to analyze the data of the fingerprint.
If it was storing my actual fingerprint I might be slightly more concerned but someone would have to go through a lot of work to decipher whatever print data is stored and we don't even know if it is storing something that would equate to a complete print.
Not enabling it through software is the obvious solution.
53 people have already said to put a sticker on it.
That's not a solution in so far as you have no idea if it's actually disabled or not. As I stated above - I don't believe Apple is up to anything sinister here - I just don't believe they can make this watertight. I think it can be entirely ruled out that security vulnerabilities could lead to 3rd party apps directly accessing the sensor and getting the image of the print from there. The hash stored in the chip is probably safe - but that's not the main issue.
----------
Including myself, in my first post - which, apparently, nobody read before they started bashing.
There are plenty of accessories out for the 5C and the 5S already so people are testing the device and could have come up with a solution alread.
Again, I suggested using a sticker myself - but I guess I can write that 50 more times here and you still wouldn't get it.
Have you asked multiple accessory manufacturers, if so what did they say?
And there were several things suggested. But instead of closing the thread we're writing the same things 50 more times as well.
You also alleged that the scanner reads your print even if you don't set it up. People repeatedly asked you to cite your proof. So where is your proof that the simplest solution, not turning the feature on, doesn't work?
OK I did think of something.... unless someone beat me...
Put an Iphone 5 Otterbox Defernder or any Water Proof case..
OK I did think of something.... unless someone beat me...
Put an Iphone 5 Otterbox Defernder or any Water Proof case..
I don't have proof - just like you don't have proof that it does. The difference between the two of us is that I'm not willing to take chances when it comes to biometrics and you are.
What do you think is more practical: starting a thread where most manufacturers probably read it or writing to 50 companies?
I can kind of see your concern based on the stories of students being observed via the built in chat cams in laptops.
What about the schools remotely monitoring students laptop cams even when the student wasn't using the cam or had it turned on? I think his concern, while to an extreme, isn't entirely unwarranted.
What about the schools remotely monitoring students laptop cams even when the student wasn't using the cam or had it turned on? He has a valid point to a degree. Nothing is 100% secure.
I personally only plug in an external webcam when I need to use it, the rest of time it sits unplugged in a drawer. If it's a built in webcam, a little gaffers tape takes care of it nicely.
Someone on the very first page suggested using a case that has a rubber button cover on it.
That's not a solution in so far as you have no idea if it's actually disabled or not. As I stated above - I don't believe Apple is up to anything sinister here - I just don't believe they can make this watertight. I think it can't be entirely ruled out that security vulnerabilities could lead to 3rd party apps directly accessing the sensor and getting the image of the print from there. The hash stored in the chip is probably safe - but that's not the main issue.
However, Im yet to hear a plausible theory as to what the NSA plans to do or even could do with our fingerprints (assuming they can even get them from our 5s which is a big assumption). As it turns out, the government already has my fingerprints, and Im not even slightly concerned about it.
So, I'm sure I'm not the only one here who doesn't feel comfortable using the upcoming iPhone 5S's fingerprint reader. What can be done to disable it? Disabling it in the settings won't cut it as your prints will like still be stored on the phone - they just won't be used for authentication purposes.
Some screen protectors (e.g. Spigen's Glas.Tr) come with a small plastic cap that you stick on top of the home button. Would that be enough to disable the reader?
ps: if you're intending to use the fingerprint reader, please ignore this thread. I'm not interested in your personal opinion why it's a good feature.
I don't have proof - just like you don't have proof that it does. The difference between the two of us is that I'm not willing to take chances when it comes to biometrics and you are.
What do you think is more practical: starting a thread where most manufacturers probably read it or writing to 50 companies?
neither am I - as I already stated earlier. This isn't about the government - this is about the people who also steal your credit cards or blackmail you with said camera pictures (just went through the press here a week ago). What would you say if someone contacted you and asked for cash in exchange for the assurance that your prints won't show up on a future crime scene?
Like I said, you simply dismissed the obvious solution out of hand. It's hard to have a reasonable conversation when you are going to make up problems that don't necessarily exist.
I would laugh at them and go on about my day.
yeah, I don't think so. Send that one to google translate. http://www.20min.ch/schweiz/news/story/12412390
While you might not play along, I'm pretty sure situations like that are pretty nasty.
I suggested that. If it works, that's great - I had just hoped someone actually familiar with the technology behind it could tell me if it does. Citing Apple's simplified explanation of things over and over again really doesn't help.