Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Sounds more like you're disappointed in the price of the Pro.

With everything Apple Revamped in to the new 10.5/12.9 iPad Pro, I don't know how you could be disappointed with the price point. They improved it in almost every way.
 
Reference to point NO 1. DO YOU HAVE THE NEW display... Did ANYONE receive the 2017 PRO model yet... And discerning pixels, that is NOT the issue... I have a iPhone 7 PLUS... and when you watch an HD video on youtube the picture seems to be 3D... For Nature videos, the animals look like they can JUMP out of the screen.... When watching on a LOWER PPI screen the screen looks FLAT.... I have to say watch a vid with a 7 plus screen and have it play the same time on a lower PPI screen... The 7 plus is AWSOME.... can i see pixels, NO... BUT THE WOW factor its there... AND the 2017 models WILL NOT DELIVER W O W!!!! Im disappointed...

Point NO 2.... There should be a 29W charger included WITH a Lightning bolt cord.

Point 3... SO what if 5.0 is relatively new.... THIS IS A PRO device... and FROM APPLE... Put it in there... DISAPPOINTED...

Point 4... I thought the 10x is 10 nano meter chip ... AND An Awesome technical achievement... An APPLE PRO level of achievement...

SO IF apple delivered a 4K iPad, with a 29 watt charger, would you be excited or disappointed... I would be excited...

4K would be a waste of power and CPU usage. I always charge while sleeping, you do sleep don't you?

You need to look elsewhere for your dream device.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MikaLoop and ABC5S
Comparing PPI between displays of multiple size is a waste, let's just focus on tablets: Apple's iPad line with 264 PPI comes in on place 34 on the list of tablets with most pixels per inch - the number one has 360 PPI and it's a Galaxy Tab from 2014.

Does having about a 100 PPI more really matter though?

In his shootout preview, Soneira also challenges the notion that we even need a Retina display in the new iPad. He points out five reasons:

  • Most adults don't have true 20/20 vision, which the Retina display is optimized for.
  • If you're holding the iPad further than 18 inches from your eyes, you're not at the optimal distance to appreciate the display's high resolution – "that high resolution is wasted."
  • Photographic images are "inherently fuzzy, with the sharpest image detail spread over multiple pixels."
  • Improving sub-pixel rendering, and ordinary full pixel rendering (Apple's approach), is actually the most efficient way to improve display sharpness.
Via Wired

That means that your beloved iPhone 7 Plus should have the same wow factor as the iPads have, otherwise you're just fooling yourself.

Rather than focusing on PPI, Apple made the new screens in the iPad Pro faster at 120Hz, better P3 colors, less reflective and brighter at 600 nits. Things you can actually see and feel when using the device.

Having the highest PPI is just a way of marketing for competitors that don't hold half the tablet market like Apple does. It doesn't really do anything, but having higher spec sells better to people like you who don't get what they mean.
 
This is Apple were talking out. They do improvements slowly and yes, it's maddening.

4K display is a few years away, at least.
OLED coming first and probably that won't be until 2019 (if you are lucky).

With this recent unveil, the Android competition is fighting for scraps...including Samsung.

Competition is Windows and maybe Chromebook (for students and the lower end).

iOS needs more improvement if the ipad going to replace the PC/laptop. Ios11 has some improvements, but needs a lot more.

Yes on the wimpy charger Apple is bundling. The Pros should have something more powerful included.
 
Comparing PPI between displays of multiple size is a waste, let's just focus on tablets: Apple's iPad line with 264 PPI comes in on place 34 on the list of tablets with most pixels per inch - the number one has 360 PPI and it's a Galaxy Tab from 2014.

Does having about a 100 PPI more really matter though?
Higher resolution means improved legibility for smaller text and clarity for line art, etc. As I've previously mentioned, 10.5 at 326 PPI would be almost like having two iPad minis side by side.

For videos and photos, the extra PPI is unnecessary for me. For reading comics and manga, side by side web browsing, etc, the higher PPI absolutely helps.

Heck, the article you quoted mentioned the same.
Despite these factors, Soneira says, consumers should still notice a big difference between the new iPad, the iPad 2, and other tablet competitors.

All text (small text in particular) will be much improved, reducing the need to zoom in for legibility. High-quality photographs will also be rendered with much greater noticeable detail.


Note, I think the new iPad Pros are awesome. I'm quite impressed with how many upgrades Apple crammed this year. Usually, it's a more gradual progression year over year. I'm definitely buying the Pro 12.9. However, having 2732*2048 resolution on the Pro 10.5 would've made that an automatic purchase for me, too.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Peter K.
So regardless of the new specs for the display, the device does NOT have a 4K display OR even Retina HD...
Even The IPOD TOUCH has a higher resolution 326 PPI. And the PLUS phones have a resolution of 401 PPI...
I would have expected Apple to have a PRO device to stand out, but this display is at least 4 years old...

And for those who will justify it... STOP IT... If 264 PPI is good enough why do the other devices have better. Stop drinking the KoolAid...

The charger sold with the device is inferior and Does NOT charge when the iPad is on and being used... It will cost you ALMOST 100 bucks to get the 29 Watt charger and THEN the cable to use it... Poor showing on apples part.

Bluetooth 4.2... Is that the best Apple can do.... 5.0 Is available. I like the feature that two people can link at the same time...

Yes the latest IPAD has a 10x processor, THAT is a PRO feature, maybe the only feature...
Pro features:
Second gen Touch ID . A very welcome upgrade in my opinion
Better display
New IOS 11
Apple Pencil with more capabilities
12MP camera with OIS
7MP frontal camera
12.9 Pro 2 is less heavier than first gen 12.9
A beast A10X processor.

A lot of PRO features in my opinion. That's why is so expensive. Worth the price .
 
SO IF apple delivered a 4K iPad, with a 29 watt charger, would you be excited or disappointed... I would be excited...

Apple will NEVER ship an iPad with less than 10 hours of battery. That is the gold standard for battery life.

If/when oled or micro led, or whatever power efficient technology is available to use that will give both 4k and 10 hour battery life, then you'll get the higher PPI.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HiItsMe
Apple will NEVER ship an iPad with less than 10 hours of battery. That is the gold standard for battery life.

If/when oled or micro led, or whatever power efficient technology is available to use that will give both 4k and 10 hour battery life, then you'll get the higher PPI.
Apple could increase iPad battery life for 13-15 hours instead of only 10.
 
This is a “budget” iPad for a reason. They basically took the iPad Air display and put it in the 2017 iPad. That’s one thing that kept costs down to also allow to keep the price tag low. It’s still not a bad iPad, at least it isn’t to me. Would I prefer it over my 9.7 Pro? Lol no. But I would rather have the 2017 iPad than the Mini 4 if I was given the choice.


I look at my iPad 2017 as an iPad SE. It does not have all the bells and whistles the iPad pros have but for the money it is a great machine. I knew it's limitations going into purchasing it and to me it seems a little more snappy than my old iPad Air 2.
 
Apple could increase iPad battery life for 13-15 hours instead of only 10.


How?

Outside of increasing the size of the battery, therefore increasing thickness and weight; two things Apple seems to be adverse to.

Now if you think you could engineer a better battery management system into iOS, I think Apple would be all ears.
 
How?

Outside of increasing the size of the battery, therefore increasing thickness and weight; two things Apple seems to be adverse to.

Now if you think you could engineer a better battery management system into iOS, I think Apple would be all ears.

Actually, Apple is already experimenting with Micro-Led and may be a possibility to help achieve the extended battery life easily beyond 10 hours. It's been rumored it will be used on the Apple Watch in the future and expanded to other iOS devices eventually.

The benefits with Micro Led would be a thinner display that draws less power and is much brighter than OLED (Three times brighter), and has the potential to improve
the battery dramatically. It would eliminate back lighting and provide a much higher resolution with wider color gamut.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Truefan31
Screen resolution a problem? No,it's ok for a budget tablet. Not charging while in use? Blah...my 4 year old iPad does that. If the budget tablet is too weak for you,buy the large screen iPad Pro...it's just about three times the price.
 
Actually, Apple is already experimenting with Micro-Led and may be a possibility to help achieve the extended battery life easily beyond 10 hours. It's been rumored it will be used on the Apple Watch in the future and expanded to other iOS devices eventually.

The benefits with Micro Led would be a thinner display that draws less power and is much brighter than OLED (Three times brighter), and has the potential to improve
the battery dramatically. It would eliminate back lighting and provide a much higher resolution with wider color gamut.

Right, but who is making micro led panels that could produce them in the quantities that Apple would need.
 
Look, you can get wound up over the on paper specs if you want..

But with all Apple devices judge it by the personal experience.

Pick it up, and think about it.. you'll find it's faster than the 2016 iPad Pros in some examples. It performs better than most laptops the same price and certainly any other tablet.

It's not so bad. It definitely has a large target market who are buying them like hot cakes.

The very best features and specs are reserved for the iPad Pro and have a price tag to match!
 
Right, but who is making micro led panels that could produce them in the quantities that Apple would need.

Apple acquired Luxvue back in 2014, who produces Micro-LED panels.LuxVue was granted patents related to commercialization of Micro-LEDs, which are now owned by Apple. And Samsung has also been rumored to be experimenting with Micro-LED, who would manufacture their own Micro-LED panels.

"A Micro-LED screen would give a future iPhone at least two to three times the OLED brightness under the same power consumption. And given OLEDs are already significantly more power efficient than LCDs, iPhones and other devices outfitted with Micro-LED panels would waste far less battery power compared to LCDs while boosting display resolution, clarity and brightness."


Micro-LED is indefinitely coming. The Apple Watch will likely see it first for smaller implementation and then the transition will be headed by the iPhone. Likely around 2019/2020.

http://www.idownloadblog.com/2016/10/26/micro-led-battery-life/


https://www.macrumors.com/2017/05/24/apple-trial-micro-led-displays/amp/
 
Apple acquired Luxvue back in 2014, who produces Micro-LED panels.LuxVue was granted patents related to commercialization of Micro-LEDs, which are now owned by Apple. And Samsung has also been rumored to be experimenting with Micro-LED, who would manufacture their own Micro-LED panels.

"A Micro-LED screen would give a future iPhone at least two to three times the OLED brightness under the same power consumption. And given OLEDs are already significantly more power efficient than LCDs, iPhones and other devices outfitted with Micro-LED panels would waste far less battery power compared to LCDs while boosting display resolution, clarity and brightness."


Micro-LED is indefinitely coming. The Apple Watch will likely see it first for smaller implementation and then the transition will be headed by the iPhone. Likely around 2019/2020.

http://www.idownloadblog.com/2016/10/26/micro-led-battery-life/


https://www.macrumors.com/2017/05/24/apple-trial-micro-led-displays/amp/

Yeah I see this on the AW soon, maybe next year if they can get yields right. The tech is impressive and could give the AW significant battery life improvement.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 44267547
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.