Sounds more like you're disappointed in the price of the Pro.
With everything Apple Revamped in to the new 10.5/12.9 iPad Pro, I don't know how you could be disappointed with the price point. They improved it in almost every way.
Sounds more like you're disappointed in the price of the Pro.
Reference to point NO 1. DO YOU HAVE THE NEW display... Did ANYONE receive the 2017 PRO model yet... And discerning pixels, that is NOT the issue... I have a iPhone 7 PLUS... and when you watch an HD video on youtube the picture seems to be 3D... For Nature videos, the animals look like they can JUMP out of the screen.... When watching on a LOWER PPI screen the screen looks FLAT.... I have to say watch a vid with a 7 plus screen and have it play the same time on a lower PPI screen... The 7 plus is AWSOME.... can i see pixels, NO... BUT THE WOW factor its there... AND the 2017 models WILL NOT DELIVER W O W!!!! Im disappointed...
Point NO 2.... There should be a 29W charger included WITH a Lightning bolt cord.
Point 3... SO what if 5.0 is relatively new.... THIS IS A PRO device... and FROM APPLE... Put it in there... DISAPPOINTED...
Point 4... I thought the 10x is 10 nano meter chip ... AND An Awesome technical achievement... An APPLE PRO level of achievement...
SO IF apple delivered a 4K iPad, with a 29 watt charger, would you be excited or disappointed... I would be excited...
In his shootout preview, Soneira also challenges the notion that we even need a Retina display in the new iPad. He points out five reasons:
Via Wired
- Most adults don't have true 20/20 vision, which the Retina display is optimized for.
- If you're holding the iPad further than 18 inches from your eyes, you're not at the optimal distance to appreciate the display's high resolution – "that high resolution is wasted."
- Photographic images are "inherently fuzzy, with the sharpest image detail spread over multiple pixels."
- Improving sub-pixel rendering, and ordinary full pixel rendering (Apple's approach), is actually the most efficient way to improve display sharpness.
Higher resolution means improved legibility for smaller text and clarity for line art, etc. As I've previously mentioned, 10.5 at 326 PPI would be almost like having two iPad minis side by side.Comparing PPI between displays of multiple size is a waste, let's just focus on tablets: Apple's iPad line with 264 PPI comes in on place 34 on the list of tablets with most pixels per inch - the number one has 360 PPI and it's a Galaxy Tab from 2014.
Does having about a 100 PPI more really matter though?
Despite these factors, Soneira says, consumers should still notice a big difference between the new iPad, the iPad 2, and other tablet competitors.
All text (small text in particular) will be much improved, reducing the need to zoom in for legibility. High-quality photographs will also be rendered with much greater noticeable detail.
Pro features:So regardless of the new specs for the display, the device does NOT have a 4K display OR even Retina HD...
Even The IPOD TOUCH has a higher resolution 326 PPI. And the PLUS phones have a resolution of 401 PPI...
I would have expected Apple to have a PRO device to stand out, but this display is at least 4 years old...
And for those who will justify it... STOP IT... If 264 PPI is good enough why do the other devices have better. Stop drinking the KoolAid...
The charger sold with the device is inferior and Does NOT charge when the iPad is on and being used... It will cost you ALMOST 100 bucks to get the 29 Watt charger and THEN the cable to use it... Poor showing on apples part.
Bluetooth 4.2... Is that the best Apple can do.... 5.0 Is available. I like the feature that two people can link at the same time...
Yes the latest IPAD has a 10x processor, THAT is a PRO feature, maybe the only feature...
SO IF apple delivered a 4K iPad, with a 29 watt charger, would you be excited or disappointed... I would be excited...
Apple could increase iPad battery life for 13-15 hours instead of only 10.Apple will NEVER ship an iPad with less than 10 hours of battery. That is the gold standard for battery life.
If/when oled or micro led, or whatever power efficient technology is available to use that will give both 4k and 10 hour battery life, then you'll get the higher PPI.
This is a “budget” iPad for a reason. They basically took the iPad Air display and put it in the 2017 iPad. That’s one thing that kept costs down to also allow to keep the price tag low. It’s still not a bad iPad, at least it isn’t to me. Would I prefer it over my 9.7 Pro? Lol no. But I would rather have the 2017 iPad than the Mini 4 if I was given the choice.
They have. They just don't advertise it when they do.Apple could increase iPad battery life for 13-15 hours instead of only 10.
Apple could increase iPad battery life for 13-15 hours instead of only 10.
How?
Outside of increasing the size of the battery, therefore increasing thickness and weight; two things Apple seems to be adverse to.
Now if you think you could engineer a better battery management system into iOS, I think Apple would be all ears.
Actually, Apple is already experimenting with Micro-Led and may be a possibility to help achieve the extended battery life easily beyond 10 hours. It's been rumored it will be used on the Apple Watch in the future and expanded to other iOS devices eventually.
The benefits with Micro Led would be a thinner display that draws less power and is much brighter than OLED (Three times brighter), and has the potential to improve
the battery dramatically. It would eliminate back lighting and provide a much higher resolution with wider color gamut.
Right, but who is making micro led panels that could produce them in the quantities that Apple would need.
Apple acquired Luxvue back in 2014, who produces Micro-LED panels.LuxVue was granted patents related to commercialization of Micro-LEDs, which are now owned by Apple. And Samsung has also been rumored to be experimenting with Micro-LED, who would manufacture their own Micro-LED panels.
"A Micro-LED screen would give a future iPhone at least two to three times the OLED brightness under the same power consumption. And given OLEDs are already significantly more power efficient than LCDs, iPhones and other devices outfitted with Micro-LED panels would waste far less battery power compared to LCDs while boosting display resolution, clarity and brightness."
Micro-LED is indefinitely coming. The Apple Watch will likely see it first for smaller implementation and then the transition will be headed by the iPhone. Likely around 2019/2020.
http://www.idownloadblog.com/2016/10/26/micro-led-battery-life/
https://www.macrumors.com/2017/05/24/apple-trial-micro-led-displays/amp/