Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Not holding my breath, mind your own business :)

----------

Here is the big but. To those who ask others to be huh "patient". Patients die in the hospital waiting rooms FYI. Anyhow…..

If my projects need to be done on time I can NOT afford to wait on software updates and fixes because it renders my hardware completely unusable is infinitely unacceptable. Returning it was my only solution because losing money on a project and wasting precious time isn't in my business model nor motto for clients / labels etc… The money saved I can find instant solutions and carry on with important work. If I were just a regular consumer and I can't play a game or click open a movie, I would have all the patience in the world because I'd probably have NOTHING else better to do with myself.

But even then, I'd go out for a walk and visit a friend or two for tea, but they are most likely glued to their fones anyways so I just visit the animals in the park HAH!

Not one "Pro" I know relies 100% on a brand new machine and has not one but possibly two backup systems. You have and use a 17" machine that works, has no bugs. It seems you have another machine as well so I call BS on this not getting projects done thing.
 
Last edited:
Not one "Pro" I know relies 100% on a brand new machine and has not one but possibly two backup systems. You have and use a 17" machine that works, has no bugs. It seems you have another machine as well so I call BS on this not getting projects done thing.

I use many machines to get many different kinds of work done, so when I allocate a good number of small jobs to one machine, that isn't even standing up to the test, it's out of the production line and "give me my money back" time. My one and only main machine is the 17" MBP late 2011, my early 2006 17MBP is now just for blogging and emails, poor thing, well burning CDs it is still pretty zippy with that, for demos and such. My iMAC is for watching movies and the kids to play educational games together, I have many, many nieces, nephews and god-kids and their friends, so that is in the lego room for them.

I have had many 15" retina MB's and have since either returned them or sold them, or even gifted a few to my nephews going into med-school. They just didn't stand up to anything light that I need them to do, while I did all the heavy work loads on the 17"MBP of late 2011 which I maxed out completely. So when machines can't even stand up to the test with 20+ small tasks, what is a girl to do? She can't twiddle her thumbs and wait around.

Nope not I.

^_^
Have a great long weekend everyone. Kids and I are heading to Disney Land, they are not enjoying all this snow. *Sign* luckily I have so many kids, half like it and half don't, so when I get back, the other half and I are snow shoeing yeah!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
Now I do realize that plenty of people are worry free and happy with their rMBP, maybe I recieved a bad one. For that amount of money spent on a laptop I do however expect basic stuff like WiFi and screen be in order.

Duds happen, no matter what the price. Heck, a Rolls Royce comes with a warranty.

Apple has a fix for the trackpad issue. I have had Macs for over 5 years. I did have one "dud" along the way. Apple replaced it with no questions asked. I have a 2013 rMBP (13") now that has given me no issues whatsoever.
 
I use many machines to get many different kinds of work done, so when I allocate a good number of small jobs to one machine, that isn't even standing up to the test, it's out of the production line and "give me my money back" time. My one and only main machine is the 17" MBP late 2011, my early 2006 17MBP is now just for blogging and emails, poor thing, well burning CDs it is still pretty zippy with that, for demos and such. My iMAC is for watching movies and the kids to play educational games together, I have many, many nieces, nephews and god-kids and their friends, so that is in the lego room for them.

I have had many 15" retina MB's and have since either returned them or sold them, or even gifted a few to my nephews going into med-school. They just didn't stand up to anything light that I need them to do, while I did all the heavy work loads on the 17"MBP of late 2011 which I maxed out completely. So when machines can't even stand up to the test with 20+ small tasks, what is a girl to do? She can't twiddle her thumbs and wait around.

Nope not I.

^_^
Have a great long weekend everyone. Kids and I are heading to Disney Land, they are not enjoying all this snow. *Sign* luckily I have so many kids, half like it and half don't, so when I get back, the other half and I are snow shoeing yeah!!!!!!!!!!!!

You had many 15" retina MB's that couldn't stand up to small tasks? Either you are full of donkey poodoo or you and I have different meanings for small light tasks.
 
Well I'm the one with a lot of money saved up because of not keeping the so called "latest / greatest" while getting even more work done still on my late 2011 17"MBP. When the so called "latest & greatest" fans rev up and roar just simply opening up Photo Booth app and crashing the entire computer along with HARD FREEZING when ever it wants simply clicking on 2 min videos of comedy skits and running blazing hot - nearly burning my finger tip off to the touch. While my late maxed 17" MBP is doing her heavy tasks cool to the touch and not a single fan noise, do you think I'm not going to go, oh wow, it is a great reason to save money and return all these "so called latest & greatest" NOW before it is too late.

I just have no tolerance and no patience for a piece of "latest & greatest" which costs $3400+ dollars to not properly finish any load of tasks I throw at it right out of the box. This was never the case with the late great 17" MBPs in my humble experience, they just started working right away smooth as silk since day one.

Times have changed, values are NOW TOTALLY skewed and I'm just voicing a perspective which many share, and that is a no tolerance to anything less than perfect machine from this shiny red fruity company if we paid well over 3000 dollars for a hunk of metal.

Oh, when will they learn?
 
What a shame. Recently converted from a PC laptop (where the battery life was less than 3 hours) to the 13" rMBP and I'm hooked. No problems whatsoever. Hopefully more share this same joy with me. :D
 
I purchased one from day 1 and have been having trackpad and keyboard issues as well as safari not scrolling smoothly, so I have returned and been waiting for apple to address it.
Went back and got one again, no issues at all, :)
 
Well, since not only hardware but also software is considered "a product", they definitely did release a faulty one. And it has some tradition to the latest apple releases. Just think about the introduction of the retina macbook in 2012...
It should be embarrassing for a company like apple to announce the "best display in the industry" and then tell customers that ghosting is normal for IPS panels.
After those display issues and all the other problems with the rMBP one should assume that apple will do everything to get the next product 100% right - but obviously (as we see now) they don't really care.
It's a shame...

LG produced those initial displays. Not Apple. If you had an issue, Apple gladly replaced them no questions asked (I've got two of them and had my LG switched out in 22 hours with a Sammy, no issues since.).

The Retina to me is an upgrade in specifications and aesthetics but a downgrade in future-proofing and longevity. The VERY moment, you pass the memory requirements of a Retina, you've officially outlived the machine because there's nothing you can do about it. At least with a Classic you can upgrade the ram.

You can't put ANY more RAM in a classic than you can an rMBP. Both only configure up to 16GB, and that's standard on the 15" with double the PCIe SSD capacity, faster processor and discreet graphics to go along with the new iGPU from Intel.

The classic is relegated to a now year old processor, year old iGPU and impossible to install PCIe SSD or WiFi AC or dual ThunderBolt or HDMI...or the best display on the market in a laptop...best I've owned in 30 years!

I also ordered the 13" and it was yellowish.. I returned it..

The guy at the apple store told me to look for a Mid 2012 MacBookPro9,1 2.3ghz 15" where you can change the HD and ram .. he said those machines are much better value than current Retina....

Soo i think I will search for a used 2012 pre retina model... any thoughts?

He was full of it. Try another rMBP. I'd try to get the latest....the newer iGPU is a nice update, as is the battery savings from Haswell...and a decrease in size and weight (small, but if you're buying into a 13", definitely relevant)


Sleep problems with Mavericks on all models - no fix yet
wifi/trackpad issues
Gmail

When you release an OS with a mail app that doesn't work with gmail, the largest email service, its a clear sign it wasn't even tested.

Its great we are getting the update, but it should never have been broken. Every oem releases fixes and updates, its nothing special. Apple prides itself on 'it just works' and should be held to a higher standard.

Every OEM releases fixes? Like it took M/S to update 8 to 8.1? Apple's ON TOP of their patches. I never had issues with Gmail as others did...trackpad has been addressed, and their latest OS was offered as a free upgrade. It's BRAND new! it's NOT broken...Have you ANY idea how much code is written and re-written for a modern OS? 15-20GB of OS is literally dozens, if not hundreds of millions of lines of code. That the damn things actually boot to the desktop seems magical if you understand this stuff! Beta testing is closed...there are a finite amount of folks working on it....and IMO, they've released the MOST stable release in a LONG time. Small issues, like Gmail have been addressed. 10.1 and 10.2 are being worked on simultaneously. At least you didn't have to pay $119 to upgrade to 10.9 as an OSx user...unlike Window's users going from 7-->8!

Yep, and that is a false hope / web hype perception, not what many of us long time professional users set our selves up for. I have been using Mac's professionally since 1992 and not a *single* product has been without hiccups, major or minor.

Every Mc'Novice has blurted out how well Mavericks has been working for them and how Apple got it right with revision 10.9.0 but in the real world, that is just not the case.

For example, my very well maintained and high end Mac Pro is seeing all kinds of odds things from drives that cause boot hangups, slow window switching and odd sleep behavior. Not hardware related, all OS related. Several people complained of their 13"s being laggy when launching disk utility. Well guess what, my uber capable GTX 680 GPU in my Mac Pro does *exactly* the same thing!

With the exception of some of the early serial numbers of the 13" having image retention prone screens, nothing has been hardware related, all OSX. All machines respond differently to early OS bugs, this has been the way it has been since I was using OS 8. So when web-fabulists starting calling foul on new hardware when the OS is bugging it out, well that is the problem with the web, people not understanding *why* something is happening so they blame it on the new hardware.

Precisely...and a capable professional, or at least a 'smart' professional that relies on their systems to make the mortgage payment aren't upgrading to a brand new OS the day of release. They'll be smart, hold off til the first .x or .2x releases are in the wild.

Nothing at ALL wrong with the hardware...Apple is definitely pushing the limit of hardware and technology with displays, storage, graphic processing, incredible and functional/efficient trackpad multi-gesturing, etc. There are going to be bumps in the road.

Keep a stable version of the last OS on your MP (we still have a Snow Leopard partition on our 2010 MacPro)----and you're good to go!

Not holding my breath, mind your own business :)

----------

Here is the big but. To those who ask others to be huh "patient". Patients die in the hospital waiting rooms FYI. Anyhow…..

If my projects need to be done on time I can NOT afford to wait on software updates and fixes because it renders my hardware completely unusable is infinitely unacceptable. Returning it was my only solution because losing money on a project and wasting precious time isn't in my business model nor motto for clients / labels etc… The money saved I can find instant solutions and carry on with important work. If I were just a regular consumer and I can't play a game or click open a movie, I would have all the patience in the world because I'd probably have NOTHING else better to do with myself.

But even then, I'd go out for a walk and visit a friend or two for tea, but they are most likely glued to their fones anyways so I just visit the animals in the park HAH!

I think they were talking about having patience, and no...patience won't kill you like some 'patients' that die in the 'waiting room' :confused:

I'm not sure where you're going with this....the rMBP does the exact opposite of 'waste time'. It's fast as hell!

I'm curious, what are these 'projects' that you do that aren't being handled by the rMBP?

I use many machines to get many different kinds of work done, so when I allocate a good number of small jobs to one machine, that isn't even standing up to the test, it's out of the production line and "give me my money back" time. My one and only main machine is the 17" MBP late 2011, my early 2006 17MBP is now just for blogging and emails, poor thing, well burning CDs it is still pretty zippy with that, for demos and such. My iMAC is for watching movies and the kids to play educational games together, I have many, many nieces, nephews and god-kids and their friends, so that is in the lego room for them.

I have had many 15" retina MB's and have since either returned them or sold them, or even gifted a few to my nephews going into med-school. They just didn't stand up to anything light that I need them to do, while I did all the heavy work loads on the 17"MBP of late 2011 which I maxed out completely. So when machines can't even stand up to the test with 20+ small tasks, what is a girl to do? She can't twiddle her thumbs and wait around.

Nope not I.

Interesting....I've got the EXACT same 17" as you, in fact a pair of 2011s. An early 2.2/16GB/500GB Sam 840ssd and the late 2011 2.5/16GB/500+500 Sammy 840pro SSDs (one in the Op bay). Both of our 2012 rMBPs run absolute CIRCLES around my 17s!!! And it kills me! I've been a 17" 'only' owner for 7 years, didn't wanna even try the 15". I was pissed when Apple dropped the 17 (but I'm not convinced they have...especially after seeing what they've done with the Mac Pro...I think a 4k 17" workstation may be on the horizon. Not as a money maker...but as a 'unique' and creative portable workstation). That said, I bought my wife the first 15" rMBP and couldn't put it down. Especially being able to still use 1920x1200 and STILL read the pin sharp text, see the details, edit 1080p motion in window and canvas with ALL pixels present...while the rest of the UI maintains the 'pixel doubling' of the OS so I can make out, easily target and manipulate the system the same way I was with my 17". It's just lighter! We're using Smoke, Cinema 4d, After Effects, PhotoShop, FCP 7 and X as well as Premier, Encore, Audition and Pro Tools. On my 2012 2.7/16/768 rMBP, I've got a 250GB Windows partition and 500GB for OSX, two Thunderbolt RAID arrays and twin Eizo monitors for color correction.

Between transcoding, finalizing, and conversion of different audio and video formats...my year old rMBP lays WASTE to my 2011 17" MBPs, the same you're saying the opposite about. I'm perplexed!
The most demanding task I find is using After Effects for intense work and exceeding frames in relation to RAM. But this is evident in ANY rig. Put 512, 1028GB of RAM in a multi core system....doesn't matter. If you have enough frames, AE will eat EVERY piece of RAM it can....and this is a good thing! It helps as well that OSX is so damn good at RAM allocation, preservation and efficiency. Whether you've got a 4GB rig or 64 in your Pro, OSx will utilize what it needs, when it needs it....and with today's new rMBP and Mac Pro releases with upwards of 1GB/s read/write speeds, paging will become a thing of the past. Amazingly noticeable on a spinning disc, but less and less so with fast solid state storage. As you're aware....like you said, you run a pair of SSDs in RAID internally...you're seeing the speed differences as those read/write numbers climb. PCIe storage is the next step in that evolution. NO one else is doing this in the industry....and what Apple's doing with their new Mac Pro, Quad, 6 and 12 core Xeon Procs with Workstation Dual AMD Firepro cards (and the computational power/RAM on board the GPUs)....the computing power from these little cylinders is going to be amazing. Something we've never seen come out of such a small package. ⅛ the size of the current Mac Pro. One Fan. Quiet and user accessible parts....Thunderbolt 2 and 6 in/outs, HDMI, USB3, and the ability to drive two or three 4k displays simultaneously---VERY exciting time to be 'patient' with Apple. It would be cool if other companies started unique and interesting ways....as Apple has done, to re-invent the way we use our computers moving forward. It's becoming more and more obvious that the desktop is going to be a relic sooner than later. Reserved for extreme gamers and enthusiasts...or workstations where the 'power' is necessary 'locally' to manipulate CAD or Motion.

That said...the current rMBP is damn near as fast as ANY Mac Pro ever made, with the exception of the latest 12 core/dual six core---or 6 core procs. Pretty amazing in a 4 pound package, don't ya think?

I'm just having a hard time, vpro, understanding the 'tasks' you're unable to perform with the 2012 or current 2013 rMBPs? Or for that matter all the other $3,000 you've gifted away?

Doesn't sound to me like you've saved a lot of money up not wanting the latest and greatest....didn't you just say you bought them, then brought them back and/or gifted them because they weren't up to snuff?

Your quote below goes against EVERY benchmark measured, review written and experience experienced on these new rMBPs!!!! Not just the fact that we're now two generations newer in the silicon department, but REAL iGPUs now, double the CPU performance since then, probably quadruple (if not more) in the discrete GPU department....and even though you can still put your own RAM in there, you can't fit any more than the rMPB can be configured with. Nor can you add PCIe SSD storage, ThunderBolt 2-----and that PCMICA slot, trying to get an actual 'working' USB3 peripheral---Good. Luck! I bought three from OWC before giving up and sticking with ThunderBolt. Cool thing is...with the new ones, you get twin T/B ports, two USB 3 ports, HDMI and the SD card reader. Pretty nice additions.

If, for some reason...you ended up with a 'dud'....which Can Happen, I'll be the first to admit---there isn't a better post purchase and support company on earth to deal with. Apple's as good as it gets when it comes to taking care of problems and/or faults. Typically with a replacement on the spot!

Well I'm the one with a lot of money saved up because of not keeping the so called "latest / greatest" while getting even more work done still on my late 2011 17"MBP. When the so called "latest & greatest" fans rev up and roar just simply opening up Photo Booth app and crashing the entire computer along with HARD FREEZING when ever it wants simply clicking on 2 min videos of comedy skits and running blazing hot - nearly burning my finger tip off to the touch. While my late maxed 17" MBP is doing her heavy tasks cool to the touch and not a single fan noise, do you think I'm not going to go, oh wow, it is a great reason to save money and return all these "so called latest & greatest" NOW before it is too late.

I just have no tolerance and no patience for a piece of "latest & greatest" which costs $3400+ dollars to not properly finish any load of tasks I throw at it right out of the box. This was never the case with the late great 17" MBPs in my humble experience, they just started working right away smooth as silk since day one.

Times have changed, values are NOW TOTALLY skewed and I'm just voicing a perspective which many share, and that is a no tolerance to anything less than perfect machine from this shiny red fruity company if we paid well over 3000 dollars for a hunk of metal.

Oh, when will they learn?

As a 43 year old, I've grown up with computers...like many here, I had the IIe and Com 64 in the early days----2/3/486 (w/Turbo!), Pentium 2s, 3s, and 4s, Athlons and core i Procs....Windows for 25 years (not always by choice) but the last 10, Macs at home and for our business. There is NOTHING on the market that competes with the 15" rMBP. Absolutely Nothing!. In my experience of usage and ownership of many dozens of computers, the rMBP is the one computer I can honestly say in 30 years of ownership----and a year of owning it itself, is the BEST damn computer I've ever owned/used, or had the pleasure and means to own. It's paid for itself many times over---which in my opinion is the definition of 'excellent'.

I kinda think you've either A) Never used an rMBP for any length of time or B) received, pardon the pun....a Bad Apple. There's no two ways about it. Again, whether objective/pure numbers and benchmarks or subjective user experience, ask ANY rMBP owner a year later about their laptop and I'd bet 97 or 98 out of 100 will say the same....Best Damn Computer I've EVER Owned!

J
 
I'm actually considering the cMBP myself for much of the same reasons. The only thing that scares me of is I can see support for it quickly ending with a future version of OSX requiring a Retina Display.

huh? how can they do that since they need to support all screen types for things like Mac Mini? Not going to happen.
 
When you release an OS with a mail app that doesn't work with gmail, the largest email service, its a clear sign it wasn't even tested.

Ive run Mavericks since DP2 with absolutely no gmail issues.

You know bugs dont necessarily affect all people in all use cases right?
 
Late 2012 rMPB 15" for me and 13" + two Haswell MBA for my friends. All of them run flawless on day 1. I set up all of them and they all worked as expected.

I know that there are issues with Wifi and trackpad on many of the MBs but in your case you are really unlucky to get all the issues. It's just me but if I were you I would go for the new Haswell MBA because they are freakin fast for their size, battery life is insane and since you don't have a problem with low res screen ...it would make more sense?
 
Well I'm the one with a lot of money saved up because of not keeping the so called "latest / greatest" while getting even more work done still on my late 2011 17"MBP. When the so called "latest & greatest" fans rev up and roar just simply opening up Photo Booth app and crashing the entire computer along with HARD FREEZING when ever it wants simply clicking on 2 min videos of comedy skits and running blazing hot - nearly burning my finger tip off to the touch. While my late maxed 17" MBP is doing her heavy tasks cool to the touch and not a single fan noise, do you think I'm not going to go, oh wow, it is a great reason to save money and return all these "so called latest & greatest" NOW before it is too late.

I just have no tolerance and no patience for a piece of "latest & greatest" which costs $3400+ dollars to not properly finish any load of tasks I throw at it right out of the box. This was never the case with the late great 17" MBPs in my humble experience, they just started working right away smooth as silk since day one.

Times have changed, values are NOW TOTALLY skewed and I'm just voicing a perspective which many share, and that is a no tolerance to anything less than perfect machine from this shiny red fruity company if we paid well over 3000 dollars for a hunk of metal.

Oh, when will they learn?

Either you are full of crap or you have the worst luck in the world. There is no way that your 2011 MacBook is running faster then todays 15". Well maybe you got the lowest spec one vs the highest spec 17. I still don't see that happening.

Ive had the brand new base high end 15 since a week after launch. There have been no freezes, no lags and no other problems that you have talked about.

The way you post makes it sound like you are trying to be cool. You are not cool by not upgrading. If you don't want to upgrade that's your choice. People that do upgrade is their choice. You make it sound like you are better then everyone else. You are not.

My fans don't rev up and roar from opening photo booth. My computer doesn't freeze or crash. I get all my work done no problem. I run boot camp to use visual studio and get that done no problem too. You have to be full of it. Maybe you cant afford one and you are trying to make yourself feel better. I dunno, there has to be some reason you post this crap.
 
Either you are full of crap or you have the worst luck in the world. There is no way that your 2011 MacBook is running faster then todays 15". Well maybe you got the lowest spec one vs the highest spec 17. I still don't see that happening.

vpro isn't saying that the 2011 is faster, just that it's a better computer. I will agree with that, especially if she's maxed it out like she said she did. Take the comparison from the 2009 MBP and 2011 MBA's that I own.

The MBA is about the same speed of the MBP, but the MBP is cooler and quieter, while being roughly just as fast for mundane things. If all you do is run VM's day in and day out, you'll end up with a sustained moderate CPU load. On the air, a 50% CPU load for 8 hours will destroy it. On the MBP, a 50% CPU load is just that- a 50% CPU load. For many things the newer hardware wins, but not for cooling, which leads to throttling and random slowness.
 
vpro isn't saying that the 2011 is faster, just that it's a better computer. I will agree with that, especially if she's maxed it out like she said she did. Take the comparison from the 2009 MBP and 2011 MBA's that I own.

The MBA is about the same speed of the MBP, but the MBP is cooler and quieter, while being roughly just as fast for mundane things. If all you do is run VM's day in and day out, you'll end up with a sustained moderate CPU load. On the air, a 50% CPU load for 8 hours will destroy it. On the MBP, a 50% CPU load is just that- a 50% CPU load. For many things the newer hardware wins, but not for cooling, which leads to throttling and random slowness.

Your comparing a MBA to a MBP?

Those are two different sets of computers targeted at two different audiences.

If you really want power and between cooling then go for the pro, if you want portability then go for the Air.

If you run VM's all day, the air would be the last computer you should consider.
 
Your comparing a MBA to a MBP?

Those are two different sets of computers targeted at two different audiences.

If you really want power and between cooling then go for the pro, if you want portability then go for the Air.

If you run VM's all day, the air would be the last computer you should consider.

Why? Is one CPU unable to run x86 VM's? Given that the hardware more or less identical, really, what's the difference?

Currently, the MBA is thin, prone to getting hot, and uses an integrated GPU while the rMBP is thin, prone to getting hot, and uses an integrated GPU.

In my case, the MBA is thin and prone to getting hot while the MBP is thicker but handles a load without issue - while providing the same geek bench score.
 
Why? Is one CPU unable to run x86 VM's? Given that the hardware more or less identical, really, what's the difference?

Currently, the MBA is thin, prone to getting hot, and uses an integrated GPU while the rMBP is thin, prone to getting hot, and uses an integrated GPU.

In my case, the MBA is thin and prone to getting hot while the MBP is thicker but handles a load without issue - while providing the same geek bench score.

I am unsure what point you are trying to make?

Yes the hardware may be more or less identical but when designing the Air, it is clear that they had portability more in mind rather than cooling/power.
 
I might purchase a refurbished cmbp, if I was to thrown in a ssd and more ram, how would it compare speed wise to a new rmbp 13"
 
I might purchase a refurbished cmbp, if I was to thrown in a ssd and more ram, how would it compare speed wise to a new rmbp 13"

It would run 150% more efficient and be smoother running with more reliable results which will ultimately get you into the next 5 - 8 years more if you keep it maintained well, than if you hadn't upgraded it. Once you max it out, do a comparison and share how it faired? Good LUCK, you won't retreat a full MAX OUT.

What I'm saying on these forums is this:

The latest and greatest are NOT what they are all hyped to be. They are NOT that new and not at all that GREAT. They give you the impression and they sell it big time as such so people BUY into that trend, that is all it is, a big ol' TREND.

There has been NOTHING wrong with the "current lines of MBPs", they are dependable and ultra fast, ultra - user upgradable and fixable, how can you go wrong??? They last and last and last. They keep getting pushed out of the picture because this shiny red fruity crispy company is becoming ever more flakey IMHO. I am one ProSumer who demands more for my MONEY and that is what is my RIGHT to demand. I demand environmentally sound and ETHICAL treatment of human life practices of any COMPANY I chose to buy from or not buy from.

I am one who only purchases Built-to-order and custom anything, be it musical instruments or in this case my notebook computers. My real-world comparisons are done on completely MAXED out and latest components available presently. I do not see the point of people comparing an entry level 17"MBP from 2009 with a MAXED out 15" r-MB of late 2013 for instance. That is just non sense.

Those who just assume what I express as BS are probably only used to it in their lives. I don't bring BS anywhere I go!

I am a person of passion and integrity.

Thank you VERY much.


^_^
 
He lied to you.

Retina is better, more valuable, and will hold its value better in the future.

lol love sentences like that.

A lot of people still go for cMBP because retina output is so high it kills GPU on many apps.
If you like to edit a photo and show your buddies the "latest and greatest" sure Retina is AWESOME. If you work with GPU then stay away from it as many times you will find yourself having issues that will seriously damage your productivity.
 
Yes, but now compare the MBP to the rMBP.

I don't see what problems people have will cooling of the rMBP. When I run handbrake the CPU is working at full capacity. I see the temp rise a bit above 100 while the fans start to kick in and then within 30 secs the temperature drops to around 95.

I was actually quiet surprised. When I used to run it on the C2D mac the temp would constantly stay at around 100.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.