Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Hah so are they going to make a comedy out of Jobs' life (and death) with lots of gunfire and explosions?
 
What is someone thinking!

Steve deserves better than these two idiots.

These guys do okay with their myth busting, but reflecting on Steve Jobs' life?

This is like getting the corner hot dog vendor to step in for Wolfgang Puck.

I'll read the book that comes out the week after this so called documentary.

Jeez!
 
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_3_5 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.2 Mobile/8L1 Safari/6533.18.5)

I hope they put to bed the myth that the Apple II was the first commercially successful personal computer.

Right because in the late 70's and early 80's there were computers everywhere none of which were Apples....
 
These guys are OK. I remember i saw once some documentary and Adam was in it and he was interesting to listen to. I think they will do ok.
 
I'm personally happy to see them hosting it. These guys are outstanding TV personalities and noted Apple aficionados. I've seen them both in more serious modes and there is nothing to be concerned about. They will do the show and more importantly the man justice.
 
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_2_1 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.2 Mobile/8C148 Safari/6533.18.5)

Will I be able to find this online within few hours after it goes live. I'm a long way in east Africa
 
I hope they put to bed the myth that the Apple II was the first commercially successful personal computer.

Right because in the late 70's and early 80's there were computers everywhere none of which were Apples....

It depends on the definition of "commercially successful". While not really affordable by hobbyists, the HP 9830, IBM 5100, and Tektronix 4051 were all commercially successful BASIC-programmable personal computers that predated even the Apple I (the three came out in 1975 or earlier). The 4051 even had a display that did vector graphics. I had used all three before I had even heard of "Apple". And unlike the Apple, these were "all in ones" and didn't require an external display.

If you define a "personal computer" to be a computer that can be situated at ones office (no special air conditioning, power, or staff) then minicomputers, which basically started with the PDP-8 in the mid 1960's would also qualify. And we would also have to add the commercially successful Altair 8800 in 1975 that was basically the first hobbyist computer.
 
I'm sure Adam and Jamie will be great hosts. All three of them are inspiring in their own way, science or technology wise. Still I did not expect the Mythbusters hosts to be picked to do a documentary on Steve jobs' life. R.I.P Steve.

I hate cancer

:apple:
 
Last edited:
Come on. As far as the Discovery Channel Hosts go, the ONLY other option would be Mike Rowe. :)
 
This would have been a better host for the Steve Jobs doco.

grant-imahara-mythbusters.jpg


At least Grant is a tech geek. And would understand it all.

Or maybe this:

StephenFry.jpg


Stephen Fry is a Mac Geek.

Or maybe this:

Steve-Wozniak-Looks-Forward-to-DAC-Keynote-Interview-2.jpg


He did start up Apple with Steve.

Or maybe this:

c_ive.jpg


He did design many things with Jobs.

Or maybe this:

billg4_web.jpg


He does respect what Jobs has done and was part of the same era of tech geekery Steve Jobs was.

Or maybe this:

bono.jpg


The U2 iPod did exist.

Will add more here when they come to mind.
 
Last edited:
This would have been a better host for the Steve Jobs doco.

Image

At least Grant is a tech geek. And would understand it all.

It's amazing what a person is able to come up with, after doing a 3-second Google search;

So for someone like Savage (who started his career as a model maker and special effects tech, working over the years for a variety of big-name outfits, including George Lucas’s Industrial Light & Magic) to say that he prefers the simple elegance of the Mac and its OS to flexing his engineering muscles building any kind of computer he could possibly want from the ground up (i.e., a PC), we have to admit, we’re a tad surprised.

After all, PC geeks are quick to trot out the argument that “you can build a PC from scratch and customize it ad infinitum” to support their affinity for the platform. Savage, on the other hand, favors a more pragmatic, surprisingly nontechie explanation. He doesn’t even mention OS X’s Unix underpinnings.

It comes down to totally agreeing with Steve Jobs’s core philosophy, with his central tenet that successful interactions with objects that you use should get simpler, not more complex--that you don’t need to be watching the car’s engine running in order to drive it, that the experience should be intuitive,” Savage says. “Whatever you’re comfortable with is the thing you should use,” he adds diplomatically. “I’ve consistently found that the Macintosh works the way I think it ought to work."

Taken from a MacLife interview in 2009.
 
It's amazing what a person is able to come up with, after doing a 3-second Google search;

Read my entire post please. Then comment again when you have read it all.
I just have some random suggestions. That's all.

Yes i know all what you said about Adam. I am a mythbusters fan. It's nice you said it so everyone knows. But in my opinion I feel others would have been better. Mind you that's just my opinion and others can feel free to disagree with it.
 
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_3_5 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.2 Mobile/8L1 Safari/6533.18.5)

Steve Jobs Myth: Plausible!!
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.