Does this have something to do with Apple products and services?
Bob Iger is on Apple's board of directors which may have an effect on Apple's future steaming partnerships.
Does this have something to do with Apple products and services?
I honestly think Disney is becoming too powerful at this point. I think the majority of the 10 highest grossing movies of all time are under their belt.
Don't think that's part of what's being sold.I wonder what will happen to Fox and Friends if Disney buys them up...
why isn't Apple buying this huge library of desirable content with a fraction of its nest egg instead of letting this become owned by (competitors) Disney or Comcast? If Apple is serious about breaking into the space, why do it on only original creations? Why not use a little of its cash hoard to buy a huge bank of content and gain control of many desirable franchises and tons of classic film already well received by the public?
But what do I know? It's much better to just leave the pile of cash in the vault doing nothing...
Does this have something to do with Apple products and services?
Yes, most directly: how much we'll be paying to rent the combined properties through iTunes. While we visualize this as some kind of clash of the corporate titans, the reality is that this will be paid for by us consumers. And less competition usually leads to higher prices.
Less directly: Apple is apparently in this business now with many shows in development. Which brings up the question: why isn't Apple buying this huge library of desirable content with a fraction of its nest egg instead of letting this become owned by (competitors) Disney or Comcast? If Apple is serious about breaking into the space, why do it on only original creations? Why not use a little of its cash hoard to buy a huge bank of content and gain control of many desirable franchises and tons of classic film already well received by the public?
While that would be exciting, I don't think Disney will pull the X-Men into the MCU. FF is a given seeing how awful those movies were. There were some exciting ideas floating around the web on how Marvel could introduce the FF into the established MCU. One interesting idea was that the FF were operational back in the 70s and launched into space and were lost in a time warp, only to come back in present day MCU along with their powers and Doctor Doom.
Reed could have been a contemporary with Hank Pym and Howard Stark.
I agree. In the now many years since stronger rumors of an Apple subscription service hatched, there has been many opportunities for Apple to use its huge cash to buy whole libraries of desirable content and/or desirable programming exclusives. But Apple doesn't even bid for such stuff.
Instead, Apple seems to be plotting that original, apparently white-washed programming exclusively created by Apple can compete with giants owning upwards of hundred year libraries of content (time warner, fox, disney, universal) that also continue to create original. already-desirable content.
In my head, Apple should be a major player here. It shouldn't have let TimeWarner go to AT&T so easily. It shouldn't let Fox go to Disney or Comcast so easily. Etc. I have doubts that rumored original content will be good enough to complete with a DisneyFoxFlix or ComcastFoxFlix and AT&TimeWarnerFlix streaming service, especially when the owners of the hoards of desirable content may decide to start keeping more and more of the content they own for their own streaming service offerings (just like Apple will very likely do with their owned content).
It's not hard to think this through. If you are Disney or Comcast what do you do with all of your existing content plus this acquired content? I know what I would do. Bundle it up, make desirable parts of it exclusive and basically out-Netflix Netflix. Conceptually, Apple Productions is then just a bit player that might have a single hit show or two for consumers to consider vs. my mountains of hit shows and movies I could offer them. I can't be forced to keep selling/renting my content through Netflix or iTunes, etc. just as I can't force an Apple to sell/rent their original content through my subscription service... which makes me wonder again: why is Apple NOT a player here?
Doubtful but it does mean Disney would get the full rights for Episode 4 which was the only one they lacked. In my dreams that means they could do a 4k remaster of episode 4-6 theatrical cuts.
white-white-white washed original programming
You do know Bob Iger sits on the Apple Board of Directors right? I am sure this plays into it.
But one thing bothers me. If Bob Iger is on the Apple board and there is a cordial relationship between the tqo companies why in the world can we not get 4K Disney movies on Apple TV? Sounds like the relationship is a little one sided.
Google's Eric Schmidt was in Apple's Board of Directors, let's say it didn't turn out exactly well...You do know Bob Iger sits on the Apple Board of Directors right? I am sure this plays into it.
Does this have something to do with Apple products and services?
There is probably more truth to this than you know, remember Disney is planning on establishing its own streaming service that will have access to most Disney Movies and TV Shows, imagine if they can add all of Fox's catalog to the mix, they would be a must have subscription service at that point.It does if you consume content on Apple TV and want to know what yet another Netflix sized power player means for how you use it.
Honestly if it weren't for the Marvel tie-in I wouldn't care about this in the slightest.
But since Disney getting this done would mean enveloping X-Men and Fantastic 4 into the MCU....YAHOO!
Go Disney go!
This is exciting!
Don't think that's part of what's being sold.
I agree. In the now many years since stronger rumors of an Apple subscription service hatched, there has been many opportunities for Apple to use its huge cash to buy whole libraries of desirable content and/or desirable programming exclusives. But Apple doesn't even bid for such stuff.
Instead, Apple seems to be plotting that original, apparently white-washed programming exclusively created by Apple can compete with giants owning upwards of hundred year libraries of content (time warner, fox, disney, universal) that also continue to create original. already-desirable content.
In my head, Apple should be a major player here. It shouldn't have let TimeWarner go to AT&T so easily. It shouldn't let Fox go to Disney or Comcast so easily. Etc. I have doubts that rumored original content will be good enough to complete with a DisneyFoxFlix or ComcastFoxFlix and AT&TimeWarnerFlix streaming service, especially when the owners of the hoards of desirable content may decide to start keeping more and more of the content they own for their own streaming service offerings (just like Apple will very likely do with their owned content).
It's not hard to think this through. If you are Disney or Comcast what do you do with all of your existing content plus this acquired content? I know what I would do. Bundle it up, make desirable parts of it exclusive and basically out-Netflix Netflix. Conceptually, Apple Productions is then just a bit player that might have a single hit show or two for consumers to consider vs. my mountains of hit shows and movies I could offer them. I can't be forced to keep selling/renting my content through Netflix or iTunes, etc. just as I can't force an Apple to sell/rent their original content through my subscription service... which makes me wonder again: why is Apple NOT a player here?
I only support this because I despise Comcast.
Apple is developing a movie/TV service with a large number of products produced by Apple. So Disney and Fox are competitors. And as much as cellphone plans are of interest to iPhone (as well as cellular iPad and Apple Watch) users, so is fixed internet service (and thus what Comcast does).Does this have something to do with Apple products and services?