Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I honestly think Disney is becoming too powerful at this point. I think the majority of the 10 highest grossing movies of all time are under their belt.

Disney needs to find money to pay their CEO half a billion dollars for four years of work. So they need some financial trickery to make it seem justified. Meanwhile they fired all their American IT workers.

If you are worried about Disney being too strong don’t. They’ll likely start falling apart in a few years. The kind of things corporations do in times like these is make choices that have a short term benefit for a very high long term cost. It all seems great until it suddenly isn’t.
 
why isn't Apple buying this huge library of desirable content with a fraction of its nest egg instead of letting this become owned by (competitors) Disney or Comcast? If Apple is serious about breaking into the space, why do it on only original creations? Why not use a little of its cash hoard to buy a huge bank of content and gain control of many desirable franchises and tons of classic film already well received by the public?

But what do I know? It's much better to just leave the pile of cash in the vault doing nothing...

Apple's (or any company's) cash isn't actual cash, for the most part. It's largely held in marketable securities, which return a certain non-trivial percentage. Bean counters for biggest company in the world know better than to let cash sit idle.

Also, there's no evidence to say $71.3B would be worth it to a company like Apple. Disney can get much more out of Fox's assets than Apple, and so they are willing to pay the big bucks.
 
"Marketable securities" can pay for such an acquisition like cash. It happens all the time.

Apple is strongly rumored to be getting into the production company business. What Disney can do with Fox's assets, Apple could theoretically do too. Disney may be able to do it faster with long-long-long term expertise in this space but Apple could "buy" expertise (would actually get it as part of such an acquisition) if Apple wanted to push the accelerator.
 
Yes, most directly: how much we'll be paying to rent the combined properties through iTunes. While we visualize this as some kind of clash of the corporate titans, the reality is that this will be paid for by us consumers. And less competition usually leads to higher prices.

Less directly: Apple is apparently in this business now with many shows in development. Which brings up the question: why isn't Apple buying this huge library of desirable content with a fraction of its nest egg instead of letting this become owned by (competitors) Disney or Comcast? If Apple is serious about breaking into the space, why do it on only original creations? Why not use a little of its cash hoard to buy a huge bank of content and gain control of many desirable franchises and tons of classic film already well received by the public?

For the record, I was saying a few years ago that Apple should have bought out Disney if they wanted to get into the content production and distribution business. Still isn't the worst idea in the world, but it will be a lot more expensive now than it was then.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HobeSoundDarryl
I agree. In the now many years since stronger rumors of an Apple subscription service hatched, there has been many opportunities for Apple to use its huge cash to buy whole libraries of desirable content and/or desirable programming exclusives. But Apple doesn't even bid for such stuff.

Instead, Apple seems to be plotting that original, apparently white-washed programming exclusively created by Apple can compete with giants owning upwards of hundred year libraries of content (time warner, fox, disney, universal) that also continue to create original. already-desirable content.

In my head, Apple should be a major player here. It shouldn't have let TimeWarner go to AT&T so easily. It shouldn't let Fox go to Disney or Comcast so easily. Etc. I have doubts that rumored original content will be good enough to complete with a DisneyFoxFlix or ComcastFoxFlix and AT&TimeWarnerFlix streaming service, especially when the owners of the hoards of desirable content may decide to start keeping more and more of the content they own for their own streaming service offerings (just like Apple will very likely do with their owned content).

It's not hard to think this through. If you are Disney or Comcast what do you do with all of your existing content plus this acquired content? I know what I would do. Bundle it up, make desirable parts of it exclusive and basically out-Netflix Netflix. Conceptually, Apple Productions is then just a bit player that might have a single hit show or two for consumers to consider vs. my mountains of hit shows and movies I could offer them. I can't be forced to keep selling/renting my content through Netflix or iTunes, etc. just as I can't force an Apple to sell/rent their original content through my subscription service... which makes me wonder again: why is Apple NOT a player here?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: rafark
While that would be exciting, I don't think Disney will pull the X-Men into the MCU. FF is a given seeing how awful those movies were. There were some exciting ideas floating around the web on how Marvel could introduce the FF into the established MCU. One interesting idea was that the FF were operational back in the 70s and launched into space and were lost in a time warp, only to come back in present day MCU along with their powers and Doctor Doom.

Reed could have been a contemporary with Hank Pym and Howard Stark.

Yeah X-men need to be a part of MCU if only for a take on Marvel’s always epic A vs X stories.

As for FF.... they really don’t need to do anything gimmicky as time travel. As the MCU tv has shown us.... the MCU is bigger than just the Avengers. Reed Richards could’ve been working on his theory of cosmic power for sometime now. And has finally been able to solve the equation (or so he believes) decides to prove it by private space exploration.

Just say they were always there, just not as the FF. just like they did with Antman Spiderman Luke Cage...and other heroes.
 
I am all about this as long as we don't lose 4K support for FOX movies after this on the Apple TV LOL.
[doublepost=1529511812][/doublepost]
I agree. In the now many years since stronger rumors of an Apple subscription service hatched, there has been many opportunities for Apple to use its huge cash to buy whole libraries of desirable content and/or desirable programming exclusives. But Apple doesn't even bid for such stuff.

Instead, Apple seems to be plotting that original, apparently white-washed programming exclusively created by Apple can compete with giants owning upwards of hundred year libraries of content (time warner, fox, disney, universal) that also continue to create original. already-desirable content.

In my head, Apple should be a major player here. It shouldn't have let TimeWarner go to AT&T so easily. It shouldn't let Fox go to Disney or Comcast so easily. Etc. I have doubts that rumored original content will be good enough to complete with a DisneyFoxFlix or ComcastFoxFlix and AT&TimeWarnerFlix streaming service, especially when the owners of the hoards of desirable content may decide to start keeping more and more of the content they own for their own streaming service offerings (just like Apple will very likely do with their owned content).

It's not hard to think this through. If you are Disney or Comcast what do you do with all of your existing content plus this acquired content? I know what I would do. Bundle it up, make desirable parts of it exclusive and basically out-Netflix Netflix. Conceptually, Apple Productions is then just a bit player that might have a single hit show or two for consumers to consider vs. my mountains of hit shows and movies I could offer them. I can't be forced to keep selling/renting my content through Netflix or iTunes, etc. just as I can't force an Apple to sell/rent their original content through my subscription service... which makes me wonder again: why is Apple NOT a player here?

You do know Bob Iger sits on the Apple Board of Directors right? I am sure this plays into it.

In addition Tim Cook sits on the Board of Directors for Nike. Why did the Apple Watch have an exclusive deal with Nike? Hmmm I wonder lol.

But one thing bothers me. If Bob Iger is on the Apple board and there is a cordial relationship between the tqo companies why in the world can we not get 4K Disney movies on Apple TV? Sounds like the relationship is a little one sided.
[doublepost=1529512008][/doublepost]
Doubtful but it does mean Disney would get the full rights for Episode 4 which was the only one they lacked. In my dreams that means they could do a 4k remaster of episode 4-6 theatrical cuts.

A 4K remaster that you will never be able to watch on your Apple TV lol
 
Thank God!!!!! Go Disney!!! ISP’s will kill any content they get their hands on and make it horrible for consumers!
 
Honestly thank God. At least Disney produces content so it makes sense. Where Comcast is more of a media conglomerate.

ALSO, as a comic book fan, let's get this going with xmen and FF. Let's get cyclops back in charge and let's have avengers 4 end with Richards purchasing the Baxter building and Jen Walters as his lawyer. Disney pls.
 
You do know Bob Iger sits on the Apple Board of Directors right? I am sure this plays into it.

Doubtful. Board members are not the boss. They just have a say as counsel for the boss. If Apple wanted to do it and Iger really, really did NOT want them to do it, they could just boot Iger off the board if necessary (and it would not be necessary).

And look at it the other way. With Iger on the board, he probably has a pretty good sense of where Apple is going with this original content, rumored streaming service. Maybe he can see Apple's aspirations as a threat to Disney in the long term. Perhaps that's even part of the motivation in Disney trying to make this acquisition (besides getting the rest of Star Wars, almost all of the rest of Marvel, a boat load of other franchises, movie & tv content, etc... all the while also eliminating a key competitor.

And as you say...

But one thing bothers me. If Bob Iger is on the Apple board and there is a cordial relationship between the tqo companies why in the world can we not get 4K Disney movies on Apple TV? Sounds like the relationship is a little one sided.

...if Iger can't play friendly with Apple, why should Apple NOT be interested in acquiring Fox here? If it was "favors" to a board member, those favors should definitely go both ways.

Based on the past disinterest in owning content libraries (and bits & pieces leaked from content negotiations with Apple), my guess is that Apple values content about like many of us consumers value it... expecting to somehow get up to all of it for next to nothing. Else, Apple would have been in the bidding for the huge library and original content, etc that just was acquired by AT&T, they would have at least bid for the semi-popular Thursday Night Football, they WOULD HAVE aggressively bid for NFL Sunday Ticket and they'd be a third bidder for Fox here.

Imagine a new AppleTimeWarnerFoxFlix service, exclusively available on :apple:TV, iDevices and Macs... possibly with NFL Sunday Ticket too. Would that make :apple:TV much more popular? iOS and macOS ecosystems?

Instead, let the likes of AT&T, Comcast, Disney etc gobble it all up and then hope they'll sell/rent it all through the Apple store at a favorable rate. Already one wonders where the 4K Disney content is via iTunes. If Disney acquires Fox, do we really think 4K Fox content will be served through iTunes?

It's not hard to see where this goes if Apple doesn't get in this game. And I don't think a handful of original "squeaky clean" programs created from scratch gets them much in the game relative to monsters scooping up libraries of content built up over 100+ years.
 
Honestly, Fox should accept Disney's deal, as Comcast is pure evil and will stab them in the back the second they get the chance.
[doublepost=1529536215][/doublepost]
It does if you consume content on Apple TV and want to know what yet another Netflix sized power player means for how you use it.
There is probably more truth to this than you know, remember Disney is planning on establishing its own streaming service that will have access to most Disney Movies and TV Shows, imagine if they can add all of Fox's catalog to the mix, they would be a must have subscription service at that point.
 
I am pretty sure that Disney is just buying the rights to Firefly and they get the rest of Fox for free. :)
 
Honestly if it weren't for the Marvel tie-in I wouldn't care about this in the slightest.

But since Disney getting this done would mean enveloping X-Men and Fantastic 4 into the MCU....YAHOO!

Uhh... We're talking about Disney vs Comcast. As far as I'm concerned, Comcast can suck it. I hope this bidding war bankrupts them!
 
I agree. In the now many years since stronger rumors of an Apple subscription service hatched, there has been many opportunities for Apple to use its huge cash to buy whole libraries of desirable content and/or desirable programming exclusives. But Apple doesn't even bid for such stuff.

Instead, Apple seems to be plotting that original, apparently white-washed programming exclusively created by Apple can compete with giants owning upwards of hundred year libraries of content (time warner, fox, disney, universal) that also continue to create original. already-desirable content.

In my head, Apple should be a major player here. It shouldn't have let TimeWarner go to AT&T so easily. It shouldn't let Fox go to Disney or Comcast so easily. Etc. I have doubts that rumored original content will be good enough to complete with a DisneyFoxFlix or ComcastFoxFlix and AT&TimeWarnerFlix streaming service, especially when the owners of the hoards of desirable content may decide to start keeping more and more of the content they own for their own streaming service offerings (just like Apple will very likely do with their owned content).

It's not hard to think this through. If you are Disney or Comcast what do you do with all of your existing content plus this acquired content? I know what I would do. Bundle it up, make desirable parts of it exclusive and basically out-Netflix Netflix. Conceptually, Apple Productions is then just a bit player that might have a single hit show or two for consumers to consider vs. my mountains of hit shows and movies I could offer them. I can't be forced to keep selling/renting my content through Netflix or iTunes, etc. just as I can't force an Apple to sell/rent their original content through my subscription service... which makes me wonder again: why is Apple NOT a player here?

The movie/tv industry is a convoluted mess of rights per region. Apple is out of it element in that market. Buying a content company like TWC still doesn’t allow them to have exclusive rights to content. There are already many agreements in place for rebroadcasting and even first rights to broadcast.

Apple went the route of original content specifically to avoid this mess. Disney, ATT, Hulu etc are all better equipped to handle buying content companies.
 
I only support this because I despise Comcast.

My hope (and it rally is just a hope) is that the T-Mo/Sprint merger will give the combined company th critical mass it needs for a robust 5G rollout. This will force a race between AT&T, Verizon and T-Mo/Sprint to see who can deploy 5G fastest and farthest.

5G has the potential to make Comcast and other cable providers irrelevant.

Perhaps my hope is what Comcast fears which is why they want to get into the content creation so bad.
 
Does this have something to do with Apple products and services?
Apple is developing a movie/TV service with a large number of products produced by Apple. So Disney and Fox are competitors. And as much as cellphone plans are of interest to iPhone (as well as cellular iPad and Apple Watch) users, so is fixed internet service (and thus what Comcast does).
 
Disney already owns ABC, ESPN, LucasFilm, and Marvel Entertainment.
I see regulatory issues with this.
Combining Fox TV (not the news assets) and ABC under a single owner will be a tough sell.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.