What math are you using to arrive at cheaper? Ownership of physical media is only cheaper than streaming at low volume consuming. The more content you consume the cheaper streaming becomes vs ownership. Physical media definitely isn't more convenient. You can stream almost anywhere. Physical media, by and large, is tied to a fixed location. With 4K picture and Dolby sound becoming more prevalent in streaming, the better picture and sound gap is not that significant generally speaking.
Not to mention, how many times do people watch a title that they purchased? 99.9% of the year it sits on their shelf. If I pay $10/mo to stream and watch ten movies, that's $1 per movie. If I buy the title, it's $15-$20 for what? One, maybe two or three watches and it sits, getting dusty and taking up space? I have shelves of physical DVD's that haven't been touched in years. If I stream a movie and can't get through the first 10 minutes and stop, who cares? Can't say the same for a mistaken purchase of a bluray. I'm stuck with it.
People that ask why people stream...do they listen to radio or only listen to whatever music they purchased on CD at a dwindling number of music stores?
If that's true I would subscribe. But I get the feeling it will be more like $15-20 per month. Disney tends to value their IP very very highly, and usually charges for access accordingly.
Except for Song of the South. The PC army has gotten that one banned.
What? Disney’s library of content is huge. It’s not just animation, Disney has been making live action movies for decades. Plus all the Touchstone movies, plus all the ABC shows.Didn’t they say it would be very competitive with Netflix and Hulu? I was thinking it might be $10/month. But their library is a lot smaller than the others, unless you maybe count the cartoon shorts as separate titles.
Let's play spot the racist.I hope so. That's an incredibly important film with so much historical significance. It's a real shame it's never been released on home video.
Dale retired years ago. Chip and Pin is the future.If they include their oldest library it would be a killer. I loved chip and dale.
Let's play spot the jerk who thinks a film is racist without ever watching it, and thinks he can judge someone's character from a single forum comment.Let's play spot the racist.
Let's play spot the ****** who thinks a film is racist without ever watching it, and thinks he can judge someone's character from a single forum comment.
Song of the South was made in a time when racism was still very prevalent, and it was made partly as a political statement against racism. Casting black people in a film was a very bold move back then. Especially the lead character. It was the exact opposite of racism. The movie is also historically significant for a variety of other reason: it was the first feature film to mix live action with animation, and it was the first time a black actor won an Oscar.
Objectively, it's an incredibly significant film. It spear-headed equality and representation in film, as well as essentially a new genre of film which lead to other classics such as Mary Poppins. Censoring Song of te South from history was a bad idea, and is still a bad idea.
In fact, censoring history in general is just an awful, terrible idea. History is important, both the good and the bad.
Yes, Song of the South will probably be absent from the catalogue, which is a shame. But this is due to current Disney’s unfortunate practices of ignoring this politically-sensitive movie.
Let's play spot the racist.
I'm betting good money that Song of the South somehow will be omitted from this "complete" catalogue release. Even if the crows from Dumbo is undeniably worse.
What? Disney’s library of content is huge. It’s not just animation, Disney has been making live action movies for decades. Plus all the Touchstone movies, plus all the ABC shows.
Yeah. I get that. And I’m not looking at actual numbers, but I’m pretty sure Netflix has a lot larger library. Disney may have more quality content.
Apple says, "Just you wait and see!"This sounds like it will be expensive.
I'm sure when Disney+ launches..... you'll never find any disney content ever again on Netflix, Hulu, Youtube, Amazon Prime, HBO, etc, etc..... all those license deals will not be renewed when they have a competing service.... they will want to 100% own their walled garden.
It will be like Apple's iMessage.
The writing has been on the wall for a while.... that's why Netflix, Amazon, and even Apple now are investing more and more in original content..... just licensing stuff isn't going to cut it anymore.
Netflix has some pretty good content now, and I suppose they cancelled the Marvel series so it does not backfire. HBO has some good content as well, and I have no idea about what Amazon Prime and Hulu offers.
Disney+ is shaping up to be a killer. Apple is hiring top people, but none of the shows announced so far have called my attention.
I suppose the streaming market will change a lot in the coming years, and only a few may remain in the end.
Disney+ will be a game changer. Disney basically owns Hollywood now, and its streaming service will have great content.
Apple may struggle in the beginning with the content they are announcing, but they have the cash and can change the course to get it right. Amazon also has the cash to compete with original content.
Netflix is a holdhouse name now, but will face great competition. HBO may suffer a lot, and may end up in Warner’s recently announced streaming service. I think Hulu is the most likely to disappear (becoming part of Disney+ perhaps).
So, in the end, there may be Disney, Warner, Apple, Amazon and Netflix. Too much?
Yes, agreed
It's just going to be about who makes the most popular content..... and old/archive stuff will have less value.
Netflix has lots of great stuff.
HBO has Game of Thrones.... I've heard when the series ends, they'll revamp it right away with a new prequel series.
Showtime has Billions... even cable channels like FX get great stuff... Suits, Nip/Tuck, etc.
I think the challenge for consumers.... is we were all so excited to "cut the cord!!!!" with an old-school TV plan.... that now we've ended up paying more money in individual subscriptions that we were before with the bundle.