DisplayMate iPad Shoot-out: iPad Mini 4 Has Best Display, But iPad Pro and iPad Air 2 Also Perform Well

Discussion in 'MacRumors.com News Discussion' started by MacRumors, Nov 17, 2015.

  1. MacRumors macrumors bot

    MacRumors

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2001
    #1
    [​IMG]


    In its latest display shoot-out, DisplayMate Technologies compared the displays of Apple's current iPad lineup: the 2015 iPad mini 4, the 2015 iPad Pro, and the 2014 iPad Air 2 to see how the three tablets measure up against each other. The iPad mini 4 came out on top in most of DisplayMate's tests, which used a variety of calibrated lab measurements and image/photo viewing tests to compare display quality.

    DisplayMate called the iPad mini "unquestionably the best and most accurate LCD tablet display we've ever tested," giving it higher marks than the 2732 x 2048 resolution iPad Pro. The iPad Pro also scored well, earning all "very good" to "excellent" marks on tests, and while the iPad Air 2 did well enough to rank as a top tier display, its performance was somewhat behind the iPad mini 4 and the iPad Pro, unsurprising as it was last updated in the fall of 2014 while the mini and the Pro were both released in the fall of 2015.

    [​IMG]

    All three tablets use the same IPS LCDs, but the iPad Air 2 and the iPad Pro have photo aligned LCDs with higher contrast ratios while the iPad mini 4 uses standard mechanical alignment. The iPad Pro also uses a metal oxide TFT backplane for better light throughput and power efficiency, a must for such a large and power hungry display.

    Each of the iPads has a similar max brightness, measuring in at 415 cd/m2 (nits) for the iPad Air 2, 424 nits for the iPad Pro, and 450 nits for the iPad mini 4. On maximum contrast ratio, the difference between peak white brightness and the darkest black, all of the iPads had high True Contrast Ratios, but the iPad Pro won at this test. The iPad mini 4 had a True Contrast Ratio of 967, while the iPad Air 2 ranked at 1,064 and the iPad Pro measured in at 1,631, the highest DisplayMate has measured for an LCD tablet display.

    [​IMG]

    On color gamut, the iPad mini had the most accurate score at 101 percent (100 percent is best). The iPad Air 2 had a 105 percent color gamut, while the iPad Pro had a 107 percent color gamut, with the larger two tablets displaying oversaturated blues. On color accuracy, the iPad mini also won, but the iPad Pro was a relatively close second. The iPad Air 2 earned much lower Absolute Color Accuracy marks.
    When it comes to screen reflectance, DisplayMate called all three iPads "unrivaled record holders" for performance in ambient light. The iPad mini had a 2.0 percent Reflectance, while the iPad Air 2 had 2.5 percent and the iPad Pro had 2.6 percent. A test measuring contrast in high ambient light saw the iPad mini perform best, with a Contrast Rating for High Ambient Light of 225. Comparatively, the iPad Air 2 scored 166 and the iPad Pro scored 163.

    [​IMG]

    Due to the inclusion of the metal oxide backplane in the iPad Pro, it earned the award for most power efficient. The backplane increases light throughput and the iPad Pro's display uses a lower refresh rate when there are static images on the screen.

    While the iPad mini 4 is the best iPad display based on DisplayMate's test, the site calls all of the iPads in Apple's current lineup "unrivaled" when it comes to screen Reflectance, giving them an edge over competing tablets. Due to their low Reflectance, the iPads have "by far" the highest image Contrast in ambient light and the highest Contrast Rating for High Ambient Light of all current tablets.

    The full results of the display shoot-out, available from DisplayMate, are well worth checking out for those interested in getting an in-depth look at how the displays of the iPad mini 4, iPad Pro, and iPad Air 2 compare.

    Article Link: DisplayMate iPad Shoot-out: iPad Mini 4 Has Best Display, But iPad Pro and iPad Air 2 Also Perform Well
     
  2. grimmace macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2003
    Location:
    Boston
    #2
    Too bad the mini is just too small for my use.. Nice to see all get good marks. The glare on iPad Pro hasn't bothered me at all.
     
  3. star-affinity macrumors 6502a

    star-affinity

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2007
    #3
    Gratz Apple (and panel manufacturers – LG and someone else?). Good job on this. Keep it up…
     
  4. Benjamin Frost Suspended

    Benjamin Frost

    Joined:
    May 9, 2015
    Location:
    London, England
    #4
    My iPad Air 2 beats the iPad Pro and the iPad mini 4 for readability in high ambient light.

    Finally, I can relax.
     
  5. Jimmy James macrumors 68040

    Jimmy James

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2008
  6. robeddie Suspended

    robeddie

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2003
    Location:
    Atlanta
    #6
    The iPad 'pro'. Not even the best screen. But wait, this giant toy can at least run two whole apps side by side! What an amazinging powerful feat!!! Oh wait, sorry, I thought it was 1992 for a second there
     
  7. Rogifan macrumors P6

    Rogifan

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2011
    #7
    And if all three tablets were placed side by side 99.9% of consumers wouldn't be to tell the difference or pick the "best" one.
     
  8. thadoggfather macrumors G3

    thadoggfather

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2007
    #8
    I wonder if Displaymate gets models that are off the shelf, or if they're Apple cherry picked?
     
  9. citysnaps macrumors 68040

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2011
    Location:
    San Francisco
    #9
    Off the shelf. Why?
     
  10. 2457282 Suspended

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2012
    #10
    Indeed. They are close enough that this would not be part of the decision making process. If someone wants an ipad, my guess is that size, memory and price are the three things that will drive which one is purchased.
     
  11. Eau Rouge macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2013
    #11
    Ironic considering the mini used to have a relatively subpar screen.
     
  12. happydude macrumors 65816

    happydude

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2006
    Location:
    a gasping dying planet
    #12
    right, i don't think anyone is making a purchase choice on the screen resolution difference between the 3 models. other than a "huh, well, that's neat, i guess" this report doesn't seem to have much purpose.
     
  13. keysofanxiety macrumors 604

    keysofanxiety

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2011
    #13
    As did the iPad non-mini! And the iPhone too.

    Boy, remember how washy and matted the PowerBook G4 screen was? Getting the 2006 MacBook Pro was like looking into a sun in comparison. Of course, let's not forget the PowerBook 170 ... ;)
     
  14. bpeeps macrumors 68020

    bpeeps

    Joined:
    May 6, 2011
    #14
    I don't really see any irony in newer models being updated with better specs.
     
  15. thadoggfather macrumors G3

    thadoggfather

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2007
    #15
    because screen quality seems like a gamble for every product
     
  16. bushido Suspended

    bushido

    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2008
    Location:
    Germany
    #16
    id take reflections over those annoying dark smudges on the new displays to be honest. yes i wash my hands but one swipe and its back unlike on my old iPad 3. those lines from the smart case r also leaving those annoying smudges that can barely be removed. i guess its the coating
     
  17. agsystems macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2013
    #17
  18. Shadow Runner macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2010
    #18
    You're missing the point, the mini had a lower rated screen than an iPad model the was released before it. ie, they went cheaper on the screen in the past
     
  19. 69Mustang macrumors 603

    69Mustang

    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2014
    Location:
    In between a rock and a hard place
    #19
    I doubt they were cherry picked by Apple. If that was the case, I'm fairly certain Apple would have chosen screens that reflect a good, better, best scenario with the mini at good, the Air2 at better, and the Pro being best. But with that being said, all of the iPad displays got very good marks. Anyone, minus the niche group mention in the post, will be satisfied with what they get.
     
  20. shanmugam macrumors 68020

    shanmugam

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2008
    Location:
    Blazer town!
  21. thadoggfather macrumors G3

    thadoggfather

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2007
    #21
    Maybe, but also maybe they cherry picked the best of what each model could offer within its respective technical limitations?
     
  22. citysnaps macrumors 68040

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2011
    Location:
    San Francisco
    #22
    Do you have even the tiniest shred of evidence Apple would do that? Or are you just making stuff up?
     
  23. btrach144 macrumors 65816

    btrach144

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2015
  24. newellj macrumors 603

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2014
    Location:
    Boston, MA, US
    #24
    These are really impressive results.

    The one thing that interested me was the relatively high power consumption of the Air 2 display. Combined with the A8X, that may be why I feel like it's got the least impressive battery life of the various iPads I've owned (still not bad at all, just not as good as the others).
     
  25. BigHonkingDeal macrumors 6502a

    BigHonkingDeal

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2009
    Location:
    Fort Pierce
    #25
    I hate those smudges too! I now put a clear glass screen protector on my devices and that gets rid of them..... Never was a big fan of screen protectors but I hate smudges more :)
     

Share This Page