Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Soon there will be a bill that will ban all electronic use while driving.
Probably the simplest way to define things. With the usual caveat of meaning "all electronic devices that are not built into the car". Though whether looking at a simple quartz watch should be outlawed can be questioned but then looking at the clock built into the dashboard is probably saver. So the rule that only built-in electronics devices are allowed is a simple and sane one because then the it's upon the car manufacturer to design the car such that the distractions are kept at a minimum.

But we still can eat, drink (a beverage) and put on make up while driving.
And read a paper-based book or newspaper.
 
I've observed that no one actually follows any of these laws. They are just discreet about the behavior. With a bluetooth headset, I can have Siri text, read emails or give me directions all day long without danger of being pulled over.

Using a headset is usually allowed, what is outlawed is hand-held devices.
 
It is sad that the world needs such overly specific laws to prevent distracted driving. Just make 'distracted driving' illegal in general and leave the specifics to common sense.

Love your signature!

----------

I think you're missing the point. It's not that you will always die when you glance at a text message, it's just showing how little time it takes being distracted for you to die.

When I was recently shopping for a new car I was hoping to find one I liked that also included Carplay. I wasn't successful, but I've heard negative things about that technology too, mainly that it makes you a much more distracted driver than an ordinary car radio system. I look forward to this sort of technology making it into our vehicles, but I hope the companies behind them (Apple, Google) put the effort into making them safe.

I love your user name! lol
 
Plus, talk to the person next to you... But not a person that is in the car next to you on the phone...
There is the difference that another person in the car can see what is ahead and is much less likely to start a question when there is something happening right in front of the car that requires the drivers attention.

I think it has been shown that talking to somebody on the phone (even with a headset) is more distracting to talking to somebody in the car (which comes on top of the passengers being aware what is happening around the car).
 
Drunk drivers may not be in the best state of mind when they chose to go behind the wheel. Distracted drivers, on the other hand, are fully aware of what they are doing. Unless you're the President, your text, post, call, food, makeup, etc can wait a few seconds or minutes
 
Navigation is a godsend on the watch. I never have to look at my phone since it taps my wrist when I need to turn and gives me ample time unlike the apps on the phone.
That might fall like headsets under the category of allowed activities (as it does not require you take your eyes of the road or the hands of the wheel.
 
They clearly didn't do a lot of research prior to posting this. I'm a police officer in Kansas and our statute is pretty straight forward and it does not allow its use while driving.
 
But we still can eat, drink (a beverage) and put on make up while driving.

I just read an article about Google's self-driving cars. They've gotten whacked at intersections by people blowing through red lights. There were the usual suspects on mobile devices. But one guy was playing a trumpet. :eek:
 
I'm sure it will be responsible for distraction and deaths just like phones.
Note sure if this be sarcasm...

Morning pile-up on I-5 caused by distracted driver

Trooper Chris Webb said a driver had dropped his cell phone, went down to pick it up, and didn’t realize the traffic had stopped until he looked back up. Webb said the driver wasn’t able to stop in time and crashed into a car in front of him, causing that car to hit others.

Traffic grew to a 7-mile backup on I-5.

http://q13fox.com/2015/05/05/huge-pileup-on-i-5-caused-by-distracted-drivers-troopers-say-photos/
 
Using a headset is usually allowed, what is outlawed is hand-held devices.

Actually, the headset is forbidden in more and more countries. That's because the headset as dangerous as the device. The problem doesn't come from using your fingers on your device, but from the fact that for the human brain, the device is so high priority that it comes before paying attention to the road.

If you can't spend an hour focusing on something important rather than using your device, just sell your car and use public transports...
 
I don't care as long as they don't make me take off my watch while driving. That would be ridiculous.

As others have said the distracted driving laws need to be more generic. I know far more people who have crashed because they were messing with music controls on the console, or because some idiot putting on makeup on their way to work ran into them. On the highway I've see people trying to steer while holding breakfast burritos and all kinds of weird stuff in the morning. All distracted driving is bad. The problem is most of the people who write these laws only want to target technology because they're old and don't understand and don't want to get busted for the things THEY do in the car which is distracting. Oh and that reminds me…GPS. Need I say more? People should literally be licensed to operate one of those things. They should take a course and take a test and get it added as a class on their license. So many people drive like maniacs because they don't understand how they work and that they can be really wrong. That's far more distracting than a watch!
 
Why hasn't this been addressed yet, Apple is not the first company to release a smart watch and the current crop aside you've been able to to lots more than tell the time for years. I had a calculator watch when I was in high school, when they were 'cool'.

Also one glaring whole in this hole hand held debate is the humble walkie-talkie or 2way radio found in most trucks and a lot of 4x4s and motor homes.

Here in Australia most states have a general rule on driver distractions in the event of an accident, if you crash or hurt someone while doing anything from eating to changing a CD you can be charged or fined. This is on to of bans on using cell phones and other devices that aren't attached to the car in some way.

But I agree the law needs to catch up and make it clear for the new crop of smart watches, or are the police going to stop every drive who may have looked at there watch, regardless if it's a smart watch or not?
 
Like all new technology, it's a double edge sword. It helps us, and yet can distract us while we SHOULD be doing far more important things, like driving, walking, biking, dating, screwing, hunting, fishing, etc...

And the laws are usually the last to catch up, and usually get it about right, but occasionally go overboard.

I imagine that corporate America will love, and hate, the Apple Watch. A friend of mine drive for FedEx, and he had to pull over, stop, and shut the engine off if he was on his cellphone. I have seen a couple of drivers not doing that, so I don't know if it's a policy change, or if it only applied to FedEx Ground drivers.

It would seem that what Apple needs to do is come up with a heads up device that will reflect that information back to the driver on the inside of their windscreen. Kinda like the fighter planes do. THAT would be coolness. Coupled with Siri would be awesome.

----------

Why hasn't this been addressed yet, Apple is not the first company to release a smart watch...

Market penetration? Apple has probably sold more than Pebble has so far. Actually, does anyone know how many either have sold? I have yet to see anything but a pebble 'in the wild', so far, however I'd think that is going to change soon...
 
There is the difference that another person in the car can see what is ahead and is much less likely to start a question when there is something happening right in front of the car that requires the drivers attention.

Exactly. In fact, the person next to you helps your driving since he will react if something is wrong.

The real problem comes from information processing from your brain. Human beings are social creatures of language, any conversation is very high priority for our brain. A normal conversation, with a human being next to us, provides a lot of informations : words, but also non-word utterance (ahah, uh?, mmm...), body language, facial expressions, eye contact... Understanding is easy.
But if the person is not next to us, for instance is on the phone, our brain has to do with poorer information : we have no access to body language, the audio quality is inferior. So, our brain has to work much harder to understand. Worse, we tend to imagine the expressions of the person, as if we were in front of him, which is even more taxing to our brain.

What has been shown by research is that having a conversation over the phone exhausts our ability to process information. For instance, our eyes move a lot less and the result is a kind of tunnel vision. Likewise, our ability to process unusual information quickly plummets - for instance, it will take very long to identify something on the road that doesn't look as what you expect on the road (an animal, someone in a wheelchair). As a result, the driver can be surprised, doesn't see things in the periphery and reacts slowly.
This is the real danger. An headset or anything doesn't help that at all.
 
This is happy news for lawsuit-happy lawyers across the nation.

Don't forget the idiot politicians that are lining up to take political bribes (contributions) to write laws to limit the use of those devices, or not. It seems to depend on who pays the most...

----------

Exactly. In fact, the person next to you helps your driving since he will react if something is wrong.

Or 'the wife'. She thinks she drives the car better when I'm driving... :rolleyes::eek:
 
I just read an article about Google's self-driving cars. They've gotten whacked at intersections by people blowing through red lights. There were the usual suspects on mobile devices. But one guy was playing a trumpet. :eek:

Now he's playing the sad trombone.
 
Is it just me, or has anyone else texted and drove for the length of that video and not almost died like 12 times? Lol...

Says people that don't actually see how they drive while they text. Yea you may not have had accident (yet) but when you have to adjust the wheel when you look back up then you may not be as good as you think. And even if you don't have to adjust the wheel you still lose reaction time if something was to happen in front of you.
 
Personally, I've found it incredibly useful when driving. I don't have a gps or phone mount in my car, so when I'm using Maps for directions I only need to glance at my wrist for a second (actually, I need to activate the watch by moving my wrist, then looking three seconds later because for some reason Maps doesn't initially show the remaining miles before the next turn immediately with the directions). Plus the vibrating cue before a turn helps enormously since there are all sorts of distractions while driving (like screaming kids).
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.