In light of the news coming out of Trumpville this week, I've been thinking about it. VPNSecure is selling lifetime subscriptions today only for $39 (courtesy Enganget).
Yes, well I suppose I phrased it badly. Perhaps not "need" but rather is it recommended, since the web is about to get a good deal less "private". And I can hear you responding "recommended by whom?". And so on. I get it.What does anyone really "need?" Some who use VPNs undoubtedly need the privacy, whether from the government or business competitors. For others, the payoff may not be practical, but emotional.
Are emotional needs any less important than "practical" needs? One may as well argue the value of spending money on anything but the bare necessities for survival.
The changes only allow your ISP to scoop up and sell your data. That does not mean they will. I just read this morning Comcast, for example, has come out and said they will not be doing this. So my plan is to wait and see what my ISP does, then decide.In light of the news coming out of Trumpville this week, I've been thinking about it. VPNSecure is selling lifetime subscriptions today only for $39 (courtesy Enganget).
Thank you for this. My provider is Comcast, and that is encouraging to hear.The changes only allow your ISP to scoop up and sell your data. That does not mean they will. I just read this morning Comcast, for example, has come out and said they will not be doing this. So my plan is to wait and see what my ISP does, then decide.
Thank you for this. My provider is Comcast, and that is encouraging to hear.
Thank you for this. Really. I do believe I will hold off.http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-fcc-data-idUSKBN1722D6?feedType=RSS&feedName=technologyNews
I searched my RSS feed and found the article.
In my opinion, Comcast's statement should be taken with skepticism. On the surface, the statement appears to be for customer privacy when in fact it isn't. Comcast logs every single thing you do. I don't think it wise to allow an ISP such unfettered access. Furthermore, Comcast said they won't sell an in individual's browsing information. That leaves the door wide open for Comcast to trade / make available such information to those it does business with (direct or otherwise).Thank you for this. My provider is Comcast, and that is encouraging to hear.
Good point, Mike.What's to stop the VPN from selling your data? I am in no way a VPN expert (more like a neophyte), but some VPN companies are more serious about privacy then others. Just because you get a VPN doesn't mean they won't use your data for $$
This is a very good argument.What's to stop the VPN from selling your data? I am in no way a VPN expert (more like a neophyte), but some VPN companies are more serious about privacy then others. Just because you get a VPN doesn't mean they won't use your data for $$
Good point.I wouldn't trust a company with my data that will charge 13 cups of starbucks coffee for a lifetime VPN service. I use TunnelBear(based in Canada) they seem very legit most others are shoddy. They have 147K followers on Twitter. They respond quickly. They offer free 500MB/month so try them out. The downside they will not let you use torrent if you use that.
but most people seem to be using PIA(private internet access) not sure why, but those will allow anything. Your choice
How is that a good point? A company should not be dismissed solely because they had a sale. To say otherwise is logical fallacy thinking.Good point.I wouldn't trust a company with my data that will charge 13 cups of starbucks coffee for a lifetime VPN service. I use TunnelBear(based in Canada) they seem very legit most others are shoddy. They have 147K followers on Twitter. They respond quickly. They offer free 500MB/month so try them out. The downside they will not let you use torrent if you use that.
but most people seem to be using PIA(private internet access) not sure why, but those will allow anything. Your choice
How is that a good point? A company should not be dismissed solely because they had a sale. To say otherwise is logical fallacy thinking.[/QUOTE]Good point.
Not cranky at all. I merely pointed out that the point you thought was good, was actually very bad thinking.Someone is certainly cranky this morning.
Not cranky at all. I merely pointed out that the point you thought was good, was actually very bad thinking.
Let's just say it's a warning sign, a reason to look more closely. "If it seems too good to be true..."How is that a good point? A company should not be dismissed solely because they had a sale. To say otherwise is logical fallacy thinking.
Let's just say it's a warning sign, a reason to look more closely. "If it seems too good to be true..."
What's to stop the VPN from selling your data? I am in no way a VPN expert (more like a neophyte), but some VPN companies are more serious about privacy then others. Just because you get a VPN doesn't mean they won't use your data for $$
How is that a good point? A company should not be dismissed solely because they had a sale. To say otherwise is logical fallacy thinking.
Proxpn used to be recommended by Steve Gibson at Security Now and there was a lifetime discount of 10% or 20% (can't remember). Maybe offer still stands. It would be the one I would use if I ever did.One happy "Witopia VPN" customer for the last five(5) years.