Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Do you use Spaces? I don't get it... why do I need it?
- Thread starter OldCorpse
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
WeegieMac
Guest
I don't see the need for the overly sarcastic attempt at a reply. My comment was a serious one.
I've been using computers since Windows 3.1 and switched to the Mac 9 years ago now. Obviously Leopard was not my first computing experience, I'm a 30 year old man. Spaces is a feature that expanded on the excellent Expose, but while Expose solved the problem of having numerous windows open at one time, Spaces was just a great feature that uncluttered the computer.
That's my opinion, and unlike many others in this thread, I feel I've put it across fairly enough to warrant less of the replies like yours.
Gregg2
macrumors 604
Sensitive are we? My direct reply to your post was simply completing your thought. I was just observing that you must have used computers before Apple came out with Spaces, thus, you "can't see using one without it" any more. If that's being sarcastic in your world, you need a new dictionary.
The humor in my other post, not in response to yours or remotely related to it, may be lost on those both within and outside of the U.S. who are not familiar with the comedian Jeff Foxworthy, or the TV quiz show Are you Smarter Than a Fifth Grader? which Mr. Foxworthy hosts.
Since that seems to be the case, I'll explain the joke: If you keep everything in the same place elsewhere in your life, maybe Spaces isn't for you. Jeff Foxworthy is known for his "redneck" zingers that always start with "If you" and end with "you might be a redneck" or now, "you might not be smarter than a fifth grader."
So, as they say, if you have to explain a joke, it's probably lost its humor. That certainly seems to be the case now with this one. But, if anyone who is familiar with the above read it, I'm sure they got it right away, and at least got a chuckle out of it.
Moral to the story:
A. Don't attempt to use humor in case someone doesn't understand that.
B. Don't assume you know the intent without asking.
Have a good day.
Indeed I did! I love Jeff Foxworthy's redneck jokes. One of my favorites:
"If you can eat a hamburger, nurse a baby, and drive a stick shift all at the same time, you might be a redneck." 😀
"If you can eat a hamburger, nurse a baby, and drive a stick shift all at the same time, you might be a redneck." 😀
MacBH928
macrumors G3
I think it is made for those with a lot of work and machines that don't shutdown.
For example , if you are a programmer, you are more likely to use
2-3 programming tools, so you have your programming space
3 internet apps, safari, ichat, and something else, their own space
2 media apps, maybe itunes and vlc, so you give them their own space
instead of launching 7 programs each time you reboot your OS, you have it on all the time and organized is different spaces.
If you are like me where you witch your laptop for Safari , then use VLC, then a little photoshop. You realize that your are light user and do not need Spaces.
In older times (2002) Apple provided a lot of cool software (sherlock?) and I always wanted to use that stuff, but it was a solution for a problem that I did not have, so I never got to use it even though I wanted. I guess this is your case too. Spaces is really cool, but you have no use for it.
For example , if you are a programmer, you are more likely to use
2-3 programming tools, so you have your programming space
3 internet apps, safari, ichat, and something else, their own space
2 media apps, maybe itunes and vlc, so you give them their own space
instead of launching 7 programs each time you reboot your OS, you have it on all the time and organized is different spaces.
If you are like me where you witch your laptop for Safari , then use VLC, then a little photoshop. You realize that your are light user and do not need Spaces.
In older times (2002) Apple provided a lot of cool software (sherlock?) and I always wanted to use that stuff, but it was a solution for a problem that I did not have, so I never got to use it even though I wanted. I guess this is your case too. Spaces is really cool, but you have no use for it.
ViViDboarder
macrumors 68040
That's strange... I never had that happen. The only issue with Spaces that I ever had was with M$ Office '08. I stopped using that anyway for OpenOffice so I don't have any issues at all anymore. Leopard or Snow Leopard.
Sucks for you. 😛
Signal-11
macrumors 65816
Before Apple came out with Spaces, every major DE/WM for UNIX-like OS since the mid 90s has had support for multiple virtual desktops.
Before I switched back to Macs around 10.3, I went looking for a virtual desktop implementation. This was a dealbreaker for me. Found one, then eventually switched to a PB as my primary machine. Never used OS X on a personal machine without VDs.
I know I wasn't alone in N*X -> OSX switchers for whom this mattered, so I imagine there's a lot of guys out there for whom that "...anymore" comment wouldn't apply.
Signal-11
macrumors 65816
Sorry dude, didn't mean to come off sounding like a pedantic ass. 🙂
FWIW, I've seen a LOT of Unix/Linux guys who have switched to OS X as their primary personal machines. Heck, looking at the headers of the Linux kernel developers' mailing list, sometimes it looks like half the Real Serious kernel hackers are on Macs.
But you're right though, that's a pretty small slice of the overall pie.
I don't find it useful, myself. Then again, I've never cared for virtual desktops on any platform.
teknikal90
macrumors 68040
spaces, expose and screen corners is how I use my mac.
top left hand side is expose, top right hand side is spaces.
that way if i want to access a window burried deep under other windows in my current space, i move my mouse to top left hand corner.
if i want to go to a window burried deep under othar windows, in ANOTHER space, i point my mouse to top right hand corner, and then top left hand corner...to activate expose within spaces.
how quick and easy is that. two strokes.
spaces is good casue i can organize my windows accordingly. i dont know how I can sue a mac without these features now. it just seems natural
top left hand side is expose, top right hand side is spaces.
that way if i want to access a window burried deep under other windows in my current space, i move my mouse to top left hand corner.
if i want to go to a window burried deep under othar windows, in ANOTHER space, i point my mouse to top right hand corner, and then top left hand corner...to activate expose within spaces.
how quick and easy is that. two strokes.
spaces is good casue i can organize my windows accordingly. i dont know how I can sue a mac without these features now. it just seems natural
ViViDboarder
macrumors 68040
Haha, that's how I do it too!
I have Top Left is Expose, Top Right is Current Application Expose, Bottom Left is Dashboard, Bottom Right is Spaces. This is much more useful on my Macbook Pro than my iMac though.
TheSpaz
macrumors 604
I agree completely.
1.) CMD-Tab
2.) Who says you have to re-arrange everything each time? I just CMD-H the app when I want it out of the way. I never have to re-arrange anything.
I just don't see the point of spaces. I just need one space.
I've always wanted to like Spaces, but in the end I always stick with CMD-Tab/CMD-H. Everything seems so much simpler that way.
ViViDboarder
macrumors 68040
I don't think you quite understood...
When I'm working in XCode I ususally have my editor window opened so it's side by side with another window, ususally Safari, with a terminal console (partly transparent) over the bottom portion of the safari window. Then on another space I have two finder windows side by side so I can drag and drop between them. I also usually have Mail or another safari window open on another space for leisure.
With what you're suggesting it's way more complicated to switch between my finder tasks, coding and leisure tasks. Lets say I had all this on one space...
I'm using the finder windows, the two finder windows are side by side with everything else underneith. I Cmd+Tab to get back to XCode... Now I have Xcode up front but one of my finder windows completely overlaps my Safari and Terminal... So I really need to Cmd+Tab to Safari, then Cmd+Tab to Terminal then finally Cmd+Tab to XCode just to get the windows in the correct order. This happens a lot if you have multiple windows open. With my spaces I just Ctrl+Left/Right/Down/Up and I'm right where I left off on my other tasks.
If you don't need it, that's great. Spaces DOES offer additional functionality that is not easily replicated with Cmd+Tab or `+Tab.
-aggie-
macrumors P6
In that case, don't tab and just click on the dock icons. No? Seems simple to me.
ViViDboarder
macrumors 68040
Still you get the same issue... Clicking the dock is the same as tabbing.
I'd still have to click safari, click the correct window I want, click terminal, then click XCode otherwise I'd have my second finder window overlapping something.
Spaces does serve a purpose.
TheSpaz
macrumors 604
You obviously have a specific workflow that you use it for. I don't need certain windows to remain side-by-side at all times. That's why you need Spaces and I don't.
ViViDboarder
macrumors 68040
Exactly!
It's just that suggesting Cmd+Tab as an alternative is crazy and when people say, "why not just click?" just "Cmd+Tab is simpler" they have no concept of another users work flow! Cmd+Tab serves a purpose. I'm very familiar with what it does and it fits into my work flow very well.
TheSpaz
macrumors 604
I said cmd-tab because you made the argument "I hide the Dock and prefer to use the keyboard instead of the mouse". Well, cmd-tab navigates around in the Dock without using the mouse, so that's what I meant.
Signal-11
macrumors 65816
Because using the Dock to switch is inherently slower.
A Dock switch is at least two clicks and fine cursor aiming and movement.
Spaces is one flick with very little aiming (Fitt/corners), plus one mouse click on an extremely large target.