Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I was just pointing out that there is a difference between a cable and a dongle, and that people are only upset about one of them.
People are making noise about the one that is offered, I think that's different than being upset that the alternative choice wasn't made.

Which cable do you find missing by the way that you think is motivating all of this fuss?
http://www.apple.com/shop/mac/mac-accessories/power-cables
Much of the difference between requiring iOS device dongles, as opposed to Mac dongles, is about expectations. The iOS devices have always required dongles for most applications. However, generally in the past Macs, especially the Pro models, have had multiple types of ports built-it, to minimize the need for dongles.

I agree Jobs, probably would have thought this was close to an ideal computer as far as ports go, though I think perhaps he would've perhaps included a single USB-C to USB-A adapter so that for most people, the computer worked right out of the box. I can imagine more than a few people, who don't frequent tech forums, getting their new computer home only to realize it doesn't have a 'USB port' on it to connect their accessories to. I think doing that, along with announcing their "dongle sale" from the get go, would've probably tamped down on some of the complaints initially and it wouldn't have ever become such a big deal to most people.
This is exactly the point I'm trying to make-- every Apple pro laptop I've ever owned has required me to own dongles of some sort-- usually more than one. That has been the expectation. At the very least I've needed to convert whatever video the latest laptop outputs to whatever projector I'm attached to, and whatever high speed bus is currently shipping to whatever high speed bus was in vogue when I bought my storage.

Sure, they could have chosen one adapter to put in the box, but I don't think that would have quieted the incessant whining on these forums. Why only one adapter when I have 2 peripherals? If they included a USB-A adapter, why not HDMI?

And, as you're explaining it, people still would have complained that it was a dongle and not a cable.
So you are saying that just because one is a pro does not need / want to Sync / Charge his phone?

Let's remove the chance of surfing some internet site and using other stuff (webcam) YOU think pros don't usually do then!!!

What a limited idea you have of what a professional does!!

EDIT:
Let's travel....
MacBook Pro check
Power Supply check
iPhone Check
Power supply for the iPhone because I am a pro and cannot charge my phone with my Mac....check!

Don't see the point in bringing another power supply just because "it is small" or "It is just one more piece"....when I have been able to do it without it for so long, seems a complication rather than a "it just works" thing.

Oh I forgot, Pros don't travel!!! My bad!

Oh yeah while we are at it le'ts remove the screen, everyone knows a pro uses an external monitor anyway!
I'm curious. When you're traveling professionally, do you try to fit your laptop on the hotel nightstand so you can charge your phone, or do you leave your phone connected to your laptop on the hotel desk and rely on something else as an alarm?

I carry the charge block because it's easier for me. Should my laptop be bigger/heavier/more expensive because you don't want to?

What's wrong with just using the USB-C to lightning cable? My current MBP only has two USB ports on it-- so I can only charge a maximum of two devices, even when I tend to carry three (two lightning, one micro-USB). With 4 USB-C ports, I can charge all 3 and have one left to power the whole system if I want.
 
Last edited:
This video pretty much sums it up re dongles. Thinking twice about buying the new one as it is ridiculous to have to carry around this much.

Thanks for posting
I have the 2011 MBP (upgraded to SSD) and use the USB and SD on a regular basis. Plus I've bumped the power cord a few times over the years. I guess I can add my voice to the chorus if whiners that will miss the old ports. Fortunately my MBP still serves my needs.
 
People are making noise about the one that is offered, I think that's different than being upset that the alternative choice wasn't made.

Which cable do you find missing by the way that you think is motivating all of this fuss?
http://www.apple.com/shop/mac/mac-accessories/power-cables

This is exactly the point I'm trying to make-- every Apple pro laptop I've ever owned has required me to own dongles of some sort-- usually more than one. That has been the expectation. At the very least I've needed to convert whatever video the latest laptop outputs to whatever projector I'm attached to, and whatever high speed bus is currently shipping to whatever high speed bus was in vogue when I bought my storage.

Sure, they could have chosen one adapter to put in the box, but I don't think that would have quieted the incessant whining on these forums. Why only one adapter when I have 2 peripherals? If they included a USB-A adapter, why not HDMI?

And, as you're explaining it, people still would have complained that it was a dongle and not a cable.

Right, in the past sometimes people needed a dongle, but usually not one for everything. Personally, I need 2 dongles already to attach my telescope to my current computer, what's one more in the chain. For some people it's not just about having to use them, but possibly having to buy a bunch of them for an already astronomically priced computer. I myself only need 3 and it will still cost me almost $70, for two USB-A and an HDMI dongle, and USB-A ones are probably the cheapest dongles out there.

And I would've included one USB-A because it's the one dongle that almost every user is guaranteed to need at some point. The number of people who may need video out through HDMI on the other hand is likely a fraction of that. First, because not everyone outputs video anyway and second some people may need DisplayPort, mini-DP, VGA, or DVI instead.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 8692574
Right, in the past sometimes people needed a dongle, but usually not one for everything. Personally, I need 2 dongles already to attach my telescope to my current computer, what's one more in the chain. For some people it's not just about having to use them, but possibly having to buy a bunch of them for an already astronomically priced computer. I myself only need 3 and it will still cost me almost $70, for two USB-A and an HDMI dongle, and USB-A ones are probably the cheapest dongles out there.

And I would've included one USB-A because it's the one dongle that almost every user is guaranteed to need at some point. The number of people who may need video out through HDMI on the other hand is likely a fraction of that. First, because not everyone outputs video anyway and second some people may need DisplayPort, mini-DP, VGA, or DVI instead.
What exactly are you buying that those 3 specific things are gonna add up to $70??
 
That's a lot of dongles but many if not most seem to be used to connect to third party hardware. Your firewire example is a poor example.

If I am not mistaken, Firewire 400 came out in 1995 and firewire 800 did not come out until 2001. That seems to be a reasonable amount of time for standards to evolve. Does not seem like a fair comparison.

Right now if you go out and buy a new iPhone and a new MBP laptop and you have to buy dongle to connect them. Something is currently amiss IMO.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 8692574
That's a lot of dongles but many if not most seem to be used to connect to third party hardware.
?? Are you saying that the 2016 dongles don't work with third party hardware, or old dongles didn't work with legacy Apple peripherals and displays?
If I am not mistaken, Firewire 400 came out in 1995 and firewire 800 did not come out until 2001. That seems to be a reasonable amount of time for standards to evolve.
USB-A came out in 1995 and USB-C came out in 2014.
Right now if you go out and buy a new iPhone and a new MBP laptop and you have to buy dongle to connect them. Something is currently amiss IMO.
No you don't. You can connect them via WiFi without purchasing anything, just as you've been able to for years.

If you really want a wire between your $3000 computer and your $1000 phone, you can spend $20 and buy a USB-C to lightning cable and avoid unsightly dongles.

If you're on a budget, you can get the job done with a $10 dongle.
What exactly are you buying that those 3 specific things are gonna add up to $70??
2 USB-C to USB-A adapters at $10 each, one USB-C to HDMI adapter for $50.
 
Last edited:
?? Are you saying that the 2016 dongles don't work with third party hardware, or old dongles didn't work with legacy Apple peripherals and displays?

USB-A came out in 1995 and USB-C came out in 2014.

No you don't. You can connect them via WiFi without purchasing anything, just as you've been able to for years.

If you really want a wire between your $3000 computer and your $1000 phone, you can spend $20 and buy a USB-C to lightning cable and avoid unsightly dongles.

If you're on a budget, you can get the job done with a $10 dongle.

2 USB-C to USB-A adapters at $10 each, one USB-C to HDMI adapter for $50.

Seems a bit nit picky to me. Besides have you ever tried to load a bunch of music onto your iPhone over Wifi? Plugging it in is much faster. But who am I to be so picky.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 8692574
Any specific reason why that one? If it's 4K/60 support, Monoprice has one that does it for $15...

http://www.monoprice.com/product?p_id=13235

I've read about issues with cheap USB-C cables, including fried laptops. Not sure if an HDMI adapter has the capability to damage a notebook or TV, but no need to chance damaging thousands of dollars worth of electronics by cheaping out on an adapter.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Analog Kid
Seems a bit nit picky to me. Besides have you ever tried to load a bunch of music onto your iPhone over Wifi? Plugging it in is much faster. But who am I to be so picky.
I'm reading over our exchange and am completely mystified by the fact that you think I'm the one picking nits.

nitpicking |ˈnitˌpikiNG| informal
adjective
looking for small or unimportant errors or faults, especially in order to criticize unnecessarily.
 
Last edited:
The 2016 rMBP would be Steve Jobs' idea of a perfect laptop. Your entire workstation set up how you want, that springs to life by just plugging in one Thunderbolt 3 cable. External monitors, DACs, instruments, peripherals... all of this ready on your desk, immediately and effortlessly, while charging your laptop at the same time.

Then you unplug and go, on a laptop that's beautifully thin and has 10 hours battery life.

Yet most complaints (from self-professed pros) on MacWhiners seems to be that you can't plug in an iPhone charger without a dongle. I can't conceive of a more ridiculous criticism when you consider the above.

That does sound really cool. But it's not actually true yet. Right now, you can't actually do that unless one of the devices you want is a 5k LG monitor. Otherwise, you need at least two. And the machine doesn't actually seem to get 10 hours, either.

... I am also not really convinced by "beautifully thin". Steve actually made some pretty chunky hardware on occasion. When he was doing it, "really thin" was one of several options.
 
I've read about issues with cheap USB-C cables, including fried laptops. Not sure if an HDMI adapter has the capability to damage a notebook or TV, but no need to chance damaging thousands of dollars worth of electronics by cheaping out on an adapter.
Monoprice is a bit different than the fly-by-night operations that seem to be churning out garbage cables (and IIRC it's more like those fried laptops/phones because they were specifically being used for charging, not the case with an HDMI adapter).

But hey, your money. Just trying to save you some.
 
Steve said a year or so before he died that laptops should have user replaceable battery and storage so I don't think it's wise to put words in his mouth.

The new MBP is great engineering but it's a planned obsolescence machine with a loud keyboard and apparently another GPUgate on the horizon.
That's why the MacBook Air has always had a user replaceable battery and storage. Oh, wait a minute.
[doublepost=1480220812][/doublepost]
That's a lot of dongles but many if not most seem to be used to connect to third party hardware. Your firewire example is a poor example.

If I am not mistaken, Firewire 400 came out in 1995 and firewire 800 did not come out until 2001. That seems to be a reasonable amount of time for standards to evolve. Does not seem like a fair comparison.

Right now if you go out and buy a new iPhone and a new MBP laptop and you have to buy dongle to connect them. Something is currently amiss IMO.
Apple is deprecating physical connections between Macs/PCs and iOS devices. It used to be mandatory when the Mac was the "digital hub." Now it's basically for diagnostics or secondary backups, with iCloud intended to be the primary backup and "sync" mechanism.

And you technically don't need a dongle since Apple sells a USB-C to Lightning cable. I think as long as most iOS devices are sold to Windows users, we'll see the USB-A adapter included until USB-C becomes more ubiquitous both in Windows PCs and charging ports in airports, etc. (which may be a while). By then Apple may have switched to wireless charging and may offer a different connector altogether.

Also, all these analyses completely ignore the hard break Apple made from all the old legacy ports to USB-A back in 1998. They didn't even offer adapters for some of the old ports.

Regarding the time to evolve, USB-A came out in 1997. I think 2015 (when USB-C debuted) is adequate time to move on, particularly when there were so many different variants of USB-B (Mini, Micro, Micro-B USB 3.0).
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Analog Kid
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.