im downgrading my MBP for a legit black macbook + ipad. I'll still be able to do everything (that im currently doing) but just without the fancy "Macbook Pro" on the bottom of the screen.Whatever the reason is, this is not called downgrading.
This transformation will make op not able to do everything he used to do n mbp.
Downgrade is when you are still able to do everything but with difficulty or inconvenience.
Yes, it can be done. I have a 2010 13" MBP and the iPad 2. Only reason I need my MBP is for downloading files. I live outside the US, so the only way I can watch TV shows from the US is by downloading them, then converting them to ATV/iPad friendly formats. You won't be able to do things like that with the iPad by itself.
Have you thought about getting a cheap Windows laptop or desktop? There are some pretty ones out there for $400-$500. And then add a 32GB Wi-Fi iPad2 for $600. Just a thought.
If it helps, I did this; dropping my Macbook to go iPad full time. I actually ended up finding the 10 hour battery life, touchscreen, and newfound portability an upgrade rather than the 'downgrade' some are calling it. I suppose it's subjective for your needs, but if I can run a media company from it, I think more than most people will be able to get by. The range and surprising capability of the apps on the App Store are what make it possible.
However, saying that some limitations do remain that I require access to a computer for, around once every month:
- Video chats. I have a 1st gen, but I suppose this isn't a problem with the new iPad.
- Printing. I don't yet have a wifi printer, but it is on my to do list.
- Large documents. This is a big problem. Pages seems to only support a half dozen pages of graphically intense document creation before drastically slowing down, so I need to export and finish the work on my Mac. However, I haven't tried this on the new iPad and its greater power may have changed that.
- Backups. This is the one currently unavoidable pitfall of iPad ownership. Backups and software updates are important, and only currently possible via connection to a PC/Mac currently. Hopefully that changes in iOS 5 in June.
Other than that, I believe it's very possible to get by with iPad as your sole device. But it's very important you have occasional access to another computer for the aforementioned points.
I seriously doubt they will push updates to the devices wirelessly. If they haven't done it yet, they aren't going to. I would be extremely pleased if I was wrong.
Did you hear this from somewhere?
I seriously doubt they will push updates to the devices wirelessly. If they haven't done it yet, they aren't going to. I would be extremely pleased if I was wrong.
Did you hear this from somewhere?
Its one of the most requested features for the iPad, and one of the most annoying limitations currently. I'd be incredibly surprised if Apple didn't make the iPad a self-sustaining computer device very soon. Especially after Steve dubbed it a post-PC device, which I agree with him on, save for this current limitation.
I believe the reason they haven't done it yet is they need a robust backing-up solution first. Apple do a full device back-up prior to installtion of a new OS update in case anything goes wrong. I'm very-much expecting to see three things happen at the same time:
- A universal file-system,
- WiFi Time Machine backups,
- Direct system updates.
The three all need to happen together because they affect each other so much. This is probably a big step for Apple and why they haven't taken it yet. I'm hoping, and expecting, it'll arrive in iOS 5. But otherwise, iOS 6.